Telephone follow-up contributes to improving adherence and treatment duration in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib

被引:2
|
作者
Tsumura, Sayo [1 ]
Shimose, Shigeo [2 ]
Niizeki, Takashi [2 ]
Kuboyama, Eri [1 ]
Iwamoto, Hideki [2 ]
Tanaka, Masatoshi [3 ]
Moriyama, Etusko [2 ]
Shirono, Tomotake [2 ]
Takaki, Kota [2 ]
Noda, Yu [2 ]
Nakano, Masahito [2 ]
Inoue, Mitsutoshi [1 ]
Tsustumi, Kazuki [1 ]
Kuromatsu, Ryoko [2 ]
Koga, Hironori [2 ]
Higuchi, Kyoko [1 ]
Kawaguchi, Takumi [2 ]
机构
[1] Kurume Univ Hosp, Dept Pharm, Fukuoka, Japan
[2] Kurume Univ, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Sch Med, Fukuoka, Japan
[3] Yokokura Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词
hepatocellular carcinoma; lenvatinib; telephone follow-up; PROGNOSIS; JAPAN;
D O I
10.1111/jgh.16168
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and AimThis study aimed to investigate whether telephone follow-up by clinical pharmacists for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with lenvatinib (LEN) contributes to improved adherence and treatment duration for LEN. MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 132 patients with HCC who were treated with LEN. The patients were classified into non-telephone follow-up (n = 32) or telephone follow-up groups (n = 100) [the latter group was further classified into family-pharmacist (FP) telephone follow-up (n = 18), or hospital family-pharmacist (HFP) telephone follow-up (n = 82) groups]. ResultsThe progression-free survival (PFS) in the telephone follow-up group was significantly higher than that in the non-telephone follow-up group (PFS 6.1 months vs 3.7 months, P = 0.001, respectively). Although treatment duration was significantly longer in the telephone follow-up group than in the non-telephone follow-up group [median treatment duration: 10.4 months vs 4.1 months, P = 0.001, respectively.], no significant differences were noted between the HFP telephone follow-up group and FP telephone follow-up groups (10.3 months vs 13.3 months, P = 0.543). Self-interruption and adverse-event discontinuation in the HFP-telephone follow-up group were significantly lower than those in the FP-telephone and non-telephone groups (0% vs 11.1% vs 18.8%; P < 0.001, 25.6% vs 33.3% vs 53.1%; P = 0.022, respectively). ConclusionsTelephone follow-up contributes to prolonged treatment duration for LEN in patients with HCC treated. Moreover, telephone follow-up with an HFP may further improve treatment adherence.
引用
收藏
页码:1140 / 1147
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF LOW SKELETAL MUSCLE MASS IN HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA PATIENTS TREATED WITH SORAFENIB OR LENVATINIB: A META-ANALYSIS
    Guan, Jun
    Yang, Qin
    Chen, Chao
    Wang, Gang
    Zhu, Haihong
    EXCLI JOURNAL, 2021, 20 : 1 - 16
  • [42] Sorafenib versus nivolumab after lenvatinib treatment failure in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Kim, Yuna
    Lee, Jae Seung
    Lee, Hye Won
    Kim, Beom Kyung
    Park, Jun Yong
    Kim, Do Young
    Ahn, Sang Hoon
    Goh, Myung Ji
    Kang, Wonseok
    Kim, Seung Up
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 35 (02) : 191 - 197
  • [43] Lenvatinib as second-line treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective analysis
    Qin, He-nan
    Ning, Zhen
    Sun, Rui
    Jin, Chen-xing
    Guo, Xin
    Wang, A-man
    Liu, Ji-wei
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [44] Initial Experience of Ramucirumab Treatment After Lenvatinib Failure for Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kuzuya, Teiji
    Ishigami, Masatoshi
    Ito, Takanori
    Ishizu, Yoji
    Honda, Takashi
    Ishikawa, Tetsuya
    Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (04) : 2089 - 2093
  • [45] Efficacy and Safety of Ramucirumab in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Progression after Treatment with Lenvatinib
    Kasuya, Kayoko
    Kawamura, Yusuke
    Kobayashi, Masahiro
    Shindoh, Junichi
    Kobayashi, Yuta
    Kajiwara, Akira
    Iritani, Soichi
    Fujiyama, Shunichiro
    Hosaka, Tetsuya
    Saitoh, Satoshi
    Sezaki, Hitomi
    Akuta, Norio
    Suzuki, Fumitaka
    Suzuki, Yoshiyuki
    Ikeda, Kenji
    Arase, Yasuji
    Eguchi, Yuichiro
    Hashimoto, Masaji
    Kumada, Hiromitsu
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 60 (03) : 345 - 351
  • [46] Osteopontin in hepatocellular carcinoma: A possible biomarker for diagnosis and follow-up
    Cabiati, Manuela
    Gaggini, Melania
    Cesare, Maria Michela
    Caselli, Chiara
    De Simone, Paolo
    Filipponi, Franco
    Basta, Giuseppina
    Gastaldelli, Amalia
    Del Ry, Silvia
    CYTOKINE, 2017, 99 : 59 - 65
  • [47] The Impact of Statins on the Survival of Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib or Lenvatinib
    Han, Ji Eun
    Kim, Jisu
    Cheong, Jae Youn
    Kim, Soon Sun
    Lim, Sun Gyo
    Yang, Min Jae
    Noh, Choong-Kyun
    Lee, Gil Ho
    Eun, Jung Woo
    Park, Bumhee
    Cho, Hyo Jung
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [48] Hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation:The imaging follow-up scheme
    Lin-Na Liu
    Hui-Xiong Xu
    Yi-Feng Zhang
    Jun-Mei Xu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, (06) : 797 - 801
  • [49] Hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation: The imaging follow-up scheme
    Liu, Lin-Na
    Xu, Hui-Xiong
    Zhang, Yi-Feng
    Xu, Jun-Mei
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (06) : 797 - 801
  • [50] Clinical Significance of Adverse Events for Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Lenvatinib: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Shimose, Shigeo
    Iwamoto, Hideki
    Niizeki, Takashi
    Shirono, Tomotake
    Noda, Yu
    Kamachi, Naoki
    Okamura, Shusuke
    Nakano, Masahito
    Suga, Hideya
    Kuromatsu, Ryoko
    Yamaguchi, Taizo
    Kawaguchi, Takumi
    Tanaka, Masatoshi
    Noguchi, Kazunori
    Koga, Hironori
    Torimura, Takuji
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (07) : 1 - 15