The effects of co-utilizing green manure and rice straw on soil aggregates and soil carbon stability in a paddy soil in southern China

被引:15
|
作者
Zhang, Zi-han [1 ]
Nie, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Hai [1 ]
Wei, Cui-lan [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Yun [1 ]
Liao, Yu-lin [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Yan-hong [1 ]
Zhou, Guo-peng [3 ]
Gao, Song-juan [1 ]
Cao, Wei-dong [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Acad Agr Sci, Soil & Fertilizer Inst Hunan Prov, Changsha 410125, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Open Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Nanjing 210036, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, Key Lab Plant Nutr & Fertilizer, Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
soil aggregation; milk vetch; rice straw; SOC density fractions; C stability; paddy soil; LONG-TERM FERTILIZATION; ASTRAGALUS-SINICUS L; ORGANIC-CARBON; COVER CROPS; DIFFERENT TILLAGE; CROPPING SYSTEM; NITROGEN; MATTER; DYNAMICS; RESIDUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jia.2022.09.025
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The co-utilization of green manure (GM) and rice straw (RS) in paddy fields has been widely applied as an effective practice in southern China. However, its effects on soil aggregate and soil organic carbon (SOC) stability remain unclear. In the present study, the effect of GM, RS, and co-utilization of GM and RS on particle size distribution of soil aggregates and SOC density fractions were measured in a field experiment. The experiment included six treatments, i.e., winter fallow (WF) without RS return (Ctrl), WF with 50% RS return (1/2RS), WF with 100% RS return (RS), GM without RS return (GM), GM with 50% RS return (GM1/2RS) and GM with 100% RS return (GMRS). The results showed that the proportion of small macro-aggregates (0.25-2 mm) and the mean weight diameter (MWD) of aggregates in the GMRS treatment was greater (by 18.9 and 3.41%, respectively) than in the RS treatment, while the proportion of silt+clay particles (<0.053 mm) was lower (by 14.4%). The concentration of SOC in microaggregates (0.053-0.25 mm) and silt+clay particles was higher in the GMRS treatment than in GM and RS treatments individually. The concentration and proportion of free light organic carbon (fLOC) in aggregates of various particle sizes and bulk soil was greater in the GMRS treatment than the RS treatment, whereas the concentration and proportion of mineral-associated organic carbon in small macroaggregates, microaggregates, and bulk was lower in the GMRS treatment than in the RS treatment. The proportion of intra-aggregate particulate organic carbon (iPOC) was greater in the GMRS treatment than in GM treatment. The GMRS treatment had strong positive effects on iPOC in small macroaggregates, suggesting that SOC was transferred from fLOC to iPOC. In conclusion, co-utilizing green manure and rice straw cultivated the SOC pool by increasing the concentration of fLOC and improved soil carbon stability by promoting the sequestration of organic carbon in iPOC as a form of physical protection.
引用
收藏
页码:1529 / 1545
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of soil properties on selenium concentration in paddy soil and rice grains in the hilly regions of southern China
    Shang, Guiduo
    Zhou, Weijun
    Liu, Rui
    Zhou, Yuzhou
    Xu, Zhangqian
    Cui, Haojie
    Cai, Yixiang
    ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [22] Influence of soil properties on selenium concentration in paddy soil and rice grains in the hilly regions of southern China
    Guiduo Shang
    Weijun Zhou
    Rui Liu
    Yuzhou Zhou
    Zhangqian Xu
    Haojie Cui
    Yixiang Cai
    Ecological Processes, 2024, 13 (03) : 144 - 158
  • [23] Co-utilizing milk vetch, rice straw, and lime reduces the Cd accumulation of rice grain in two paddy soils in south China
    Wang, Yun
    Liang, Hai
    Li, Shun
    Zhang, Zihan
    Liao, Yulin
    Lu, Yanhong
    Zhou, Guopeng
    Gao, Songjuan
    Nie, Jun
    Cao, Weidong
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 806
  • [24] Effects of straw application rates on soil aggregates, soil organic carbon content and maize yield
    Meng Q.
    Zou H.
    Han Y.
    Zhang C.
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35 (23): : 119 - 125
  • [25] Higher soil organic carbon accumulation in the subsoil layer by 37 years combined application of inorganic fertilizers with manure than with rice straw in a double-rice paddy soil
    Gao, Yajie
    Lu, Yanhong
    Liao, Yulin
    Nie, Jun
    ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2022, 68 (08) : 1075 - 1088
  • [26] Evaluating short-term effects of rice straw management on carbon fractions, composition and stability of soil aggregates in an acidic red soil with a vegetable planting history
    Liao, Yawen
    Awan, Masood Iqbal
    Aamer, Muhammad
    Liu, Jianxiu
    Liu, Jiahui
    Hu, Bei
    Gao, Zhiqiang
    Zhu, Bo
    Yao, Fengxian
    Cheng, Chen
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [27] Plant-mediated effects of elevated CO2 and rice cultivars on soil carbon dynamics in a paddy soil
    Hu, Zhengkun
    Chen, Xiaoyun
    Yao, Junneng
    Zhu, Chunwu
    Zhu, Jianguo
    Liu, Manqiang
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2020, 225 (06) : 2368 - 2379
  • [28] Linking the chemical nature of soil organic carbon and biological binding agent in aggregates to soil aggregate stability following biochar amendment in a rice paddy
    Situ, Gaoming
    Zhao, Yuanlai
    Zhang, Lei
    Yang, Xingqi
    Chen, De
    Li, Songhao
    Wu, Qifeng
    Xu, Qiufang
    Chen, Junhui
    Qin, Hua
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 847
  • [29] The effects of long-term rice straw and biochar return on soil humus composition and structure in paddy soil
    Ying, Jinyue
    Zhang, Xi
    Wu, Weixiang
    Nan, Qiong
    Wang, Guorong
    Dong, Da
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 70 (12) : 772 - 782
  • [30] The potential of green manure to increase soil carbon sequestration and reduce the yield-scaled carbon footprint of rice production in southern China
    GAO Song-juan
    LI Shun
    ZHOU Guo-peng
    CAO Wei-dong
    JournalofIntegrativeAgriculture, 2023, 22 (07) : 2233 - 2247