Practice patterns in revision dacryocystorhinostomy

被引:0
作者
Gungab, Alexander Gerard Nino L. [1 ]
Boniao, Emmanuel Lee [1 ]
Lim, Blanche Xiao Hong [1 ]
Sundar, Gangadhara [1 ]
Ali, Mohammad Javed [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Singapore, Singapore
[2] LV Prasad Eye Inst, Govindram Seksaria Inst Dacryol, Hyderabad, India
[3] LV Prasad Eye Inst, Govindram Seksaria Inst Dacryol, Rd 2,Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 34, India
来源
ORBIT-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORBITAL DISORDERS-OCULOPLASTIC AND LACRIMAL SURGERY | 2024年 / 43卷 / 01期
关键词
Survey; revision dacryocystorhinostomy; DCR; lacrimal; practice pattern; ENDOSCOPIC DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY; SURGEONS;
D O I
10.1080/01676830.2023.2203757
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aimed to report the practice patterns while performing revision dacryocystorhinostomy (RevDCR) amongst oculoplastic surgeons from several regions across the globe.MethodsThe survey consisted of 41 specific questions sent via email that contained a link to the Google forms. The questions covered several aspects of the respondents' practice profiles, evaluation methods, pre-operative choices, surgical techniques, and follow-up preferences while dealing with patients of prior failed DCRs. Questions were answerable either as multiple choice or free text typing. The survey respondents were anonymized. The responses were collected and analyzed, and data were tabulated to understand the preferred practice trends.ResultsA total of 137 surgeons completed the survey. Most respondents identified themselves as experienced surgeons managing failed DCRs (76.6%, total respondents (n) = 137). The commonly preferred modalities for evaluation of a failed DCR were lacrimal irrigation (91.2%) and nasal endoscopy (66.9%). About 64% (87/137) of the respondents performed a combination of nasal endoscopy, lacrimal irrigation, and probing to localize the area of the failed DCR. A majority of the respondents used anti-metabolites (73.3%, n = 131) and stents (96.4%, 132/137) during the revision surgery. Most surgeons preferred endoscopic approach (44.5%), (61/137) for revising a failed DCR and most preferred general anaesthesia with local infiltration (70.1%, 96/137). Aggressive fibrosis with cicatricial closure was identified as the most frequently encountered cause of failure (84.6%, 115/137). The osteotomy was performed on an as-needed basis by 59.1% (81/137) of the surgeons. Only 10.9% of the respondents used navigation guidance while performing a revision DCR, mainly for post-trauma scenarios. Most of the surgeons completed the revision procedure within 30-60 minutes (77.4%, 106/137). The self-reported outcomes of revision DCRs were good (80-95%, median-90%, n = 137).ConclusionA significantly high percentage of oculoplastic surgeons who responded to this survey from across the globe performed nasal endoscopy in their pre-operative evaluations, preferred endoscopic surgical approach, and used antimetabolites and stents while performing revision DCRs.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 73
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   UK survey of the present role of ear, nose and throat surgeons in lacrimal surgery [J].
Al-Shaikh, Salim ;
Javed, Faisal ;
Fincham, Gregory ;
Latif, Mohamed ;
Bhutta, Mahmood .
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2010, 92 (07) :583-586
[2]   Long-term outcomes in revision powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy [J].
Ali, Mohammad Javed ;
Psaltis, Alkis James ;
Wormald, Peter John .
INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2014, 4 (12) :1016-1019
[3]   Current Preferences and Reported Success Rates in Dacryocystorhinostomy amongst ASOPRS Members [J].
Barmettler, Anne ;
Erlich, Joshua ;
Lelli, Gary, Jr. .
ORBIT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORBITAL DISORDERS AND FACIAL RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 32 (01) :20-26
[4]   Practice patterns in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: survey of the American Rhinologic Society [J].
Chen, Sonia ;
Le, Christopher H. ;
Liang, Jonathan .
INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2016, 6 (09) :990-997
[5]   Etiologic analysis of 100 anatomically failed dacryocystorhinostomies [J].
Dave, Tarjani Vivek ;
Mohammed, Faraz Ali ;
Ali, Mohammad Javed ;
Naik, Milind N. .
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 :1419-1422
[6]   The Practice of Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) Surgery by Ophthalmologists in the United Kingdom (UK) [J].
Gauba, Vinod .
ORBIT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORBITAL DISORDERS AND FACIAL RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 27 (04) :279-283
[7]   Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Outcomes for Endoscopic Versus External Dacryocystorhinostomy [J].
Huang, June ;
Malek, Joanne ;
Chin, David ;
Snidvongs, Kornkiat ;
Wilcsek, Geoff ;
Tumuluri, Krishna ;
Sacks, Ray ;
Harvey, Richard J. .
ORBIT-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORBITAL DISORDERS-OCULOPLASTIC AND LACRIMAL SURGERY, 2014, 33 (02) :81-90
[8]   Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction [J].
Jawaheer, Lona ;
MacEwen, Caroline J. ;
Anijeet, Deepa .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (02)
[9]   Preferred practice patterns in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy among oculoplastic surgeons in Asia-Pacific region [J].
Kwok, Tracy ;
Ali, Mohammad Javed ;
Yuen, Hunter .
ORBIT-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORBITAL DISORDERS-OCULOPLASTIC AND LACRIMAL SURGERY, 2018, 37 (04) :248-253
[10]  
Nair AG, 2020, CLIN OPHTHALMOL, V14, P3789, DOI [10.2147/opth.s279728, 10.2147/OPTH.S279728, 10.2147/OTPH.S279728]