Evaluation of quality of life after septorhinoplasty using Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire

被引:1
作者
Saraf, Aditiya [1 ]
Gupta, Nitika [1 ]
Manhas, Monica [2 ]
Kalsotra, Parmod [1 ]
机构
[1] SMGS Hosp, Govt Med Coll Jammu, Dept ENT & Head & Neck Surg, Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India
[2] Govt Med Coll Jammu, Dept Physiol, Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India
关键词
Rhinoplasty; ROE; Quality; SURGERY; SATISFACTION; IMPACT; NOSE;
D O I
10.1186/s43163-023-00445-9
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo assess satisfaction level of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty pre- and post-operatively using Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire.MethodsThe present prospective study, after approval by Institutional Ethics Committee, was conducted in the Department of ENT, SMGS Hospital, from March 2021 to November 2022 on 83 patients who underwent septorhinoplasty. Demographic and clinical characteristics (age, gender, education, technique of surgery) of all participants were recorded. All patients were asked to answer the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire 1 day prior to surgery. Postoperative ROE questionnaire was asked at the 6th month in ENT OPD by the same researcher.ResultsIn our study, the mean preoperative total ROE score was 32.17 +/- 5.38, and the mean postoperative total ROE score was 87.11 +/- 5.39, the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.0039). Higher post-operative satisfaction score (89.7 +/- 5.64) was seen in patients aged more than 35 years, as compared to younger patients (78.4 +/- 5.8). In our study, upon gender-wise comparison, there was more statistically significant satisfaction in male patients than female patients postoperatively (p = 0.0022). Better postoperative ROE score was seen in lower literacy group (88.9 +/- 6.73) than higher literacy group (83.3 +/- 5.63). However, both open and closed techniques showed statistically insignificant difference in postoperative ROE score (p = 0.388).ConclusionBased on the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire, our study showed that septorhinoplasty significantly improved quality of life in majority of our study subjects in terms of both aesthetic as well as functional parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: A review and new directions
    Alsarraf, R
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2000, 24 (03) : 192 - 197
  • [2] Influence of Age on Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation: A Preliminary Study
    Arima, Lisandra Megumi
    Velasco, Leandro Castro
    Louzeiro Tiago, Romualdo Suzano
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 36 (02) : 248 - 253
  • [3] Bilgin E, 2020, CUREUS J MED SCIENCE, V12, DOI [10.7759/cureus.11777, DOI 10.7759/CUREUS.11777]
  • [4] Bulut OC, 2015, RHINOLOGY, V53, P54, DOI [10.4193/Rhino14.008, 10.4193/Rhin14.008]
  • [5] Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: A comprehensive review of the literature
    Ching, S
    Thoma, A
    McCabe, RE
    Antony, MM
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (01) : 469 - 480
  • [6] Deviated nose attenuates the degree of patient satisfaction and quality of life in rhinoplasty: a prospective controlled study
    Cingi, C.
    Eskiizmir, G.
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2013, 38 (02) : 136 - 141
  • [7] Evaluation of aesthetic and functional outcomes in rhinoplasty surgery: a prospective study
    Esteves, Sara Sena
    Ferreira, Miguel Goncalves
    Almeida, Joao Carvalho
    Abrunhosa, Jose
    Almeida e Sousa, Cecilia
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 83 (05) : 552 - 557
  • [8] The effect of rhinoplasty on psychosocial distress level and quality of life
    Gunel, Ceren
    Omurlu, Imran Kurt
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 272 (08) : 1931 - 1935
  • [9] Normal values for the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire
    Izu, Suemy Cioffi
    Kosugi, Eduardo Macoto
    Brandao, Karen Vitols
    Lopes, Alessandra Stanquini
    Sousa Garcia, Leonardo Bomediano
    Suguri, Vinicius Magalhaes
    Gregorio, Luis Carlos
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 78 (04) : 76 - 79
  • [10] Khan N., 2017, CUREUS J MED SCIENCE, V11, pe5283