Examining self-reported motivations for physical and psychological intimate partner aggression: A systematic review

被引：2

作者：

Dempsey, Fiona ^{[1
]}

Hammond, Matthew D. ^{[1
]}

Dixon, Louise ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Psychol, POB 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand

来源：

AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR | 2023年 / 69卷

关键词：

Intimate partner aggression; Domestic violence; Motivations; Systematic review; Control; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; RISK-FACTORS; WOMEN; REASONS; PERPETRATION; BATTERERS; MOTIVES; MEN;

D O I：

10.1016/j.avb.2023.101822

中图分类号：

DF [法律]; D9 [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

Understanding the motivations for the perpetration of intimate partner aggression (IPA) is necessary for treatment. While previous reviews have focused on the frequency with which different motivations have been studied, this systematic review and meta-analysis appraised the quality and effect sizes associated with the motivations of physical and psychological IPA perpetrated by men and women. Motivations were defined as a preceding act or psychological or physiological state which influences an individual's behavior. Studies were identified through searches of PsycINFO, Sage Journals, and Web of Science databases in July 2019 and March 2020. Twenty-three articles met the criteria for review and were critically appraised. Thirteen of the 23 studies failed to provide data or report results sufficient for calculation of effect sizes, thus, the subsequent meta-analyses only include 10 studies. These results showed self-defense, retaliation for emotional hurt, and communication difficulties had the largest effect sizes. However, the small number of studies in the analyses, high levels of heterogeneity, and the differing directions of the estimates of the effect mean the results are currently inconclusive. The review identifies issues for future research to address to improve the quality of research in the field of IPA.

引用

页数：10

共 78 条

[1]

APA, 2001, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, V5th

[2] Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment [J].

Babcock, JC ;

Green, CE ;

Robie, C .

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2004, 23 (08) :1023-1053

[3] Toward a typology of abusive women: Differences between partner-only and generally violent women in the use of violence [J].

Babcock, JC ;

Miller, SA ;

Siard, C .

PSYCHOLOGY OF WOMEN QUARTERLY, 2003, 27 (02) :153-161

[4] Distinguishing Subtypes of Mutual Violence in the Context of Self-Defense: Classifying Types of Partner Violent Couples Using a Modified Conflict Tactics Scale [J].

Babcock, Julia C. ;

Snead, Alexandra L. ;

Bennett, Victoria E. ;

Armenti, Nicholas A. .

JOURNAL OF FAMILY VIOLENCE, 2019, 34 (07) :687-696

[5] Why Do Women Use Intimate Partner Violence? A Systematic Review of Women's Motivations [J].

Bair-Merritt, Megan H. ;

Crowne, Sarah Shea ;

Thompson, Darcy A. ;

Sibinga, Erica ;

Trent, Maria ;

Campbell, Jacquelyn .

TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE, 2010, 11 (04) :178-189

[6]

Barnett O W, 1997, Violence Against Women, V3, P462, DOI 10.1177/1077801297003005002

[7] Do Anger and Jealousy Mediate the Relationship Between Adult Attachment Styles and Intimate Violence Perpetration? [J].

Belus, Jennifer M. ;

Wanklyn, Sonya G. ;

Iverson, Katherine M. ;

Pukay-Martin, Nicole D. ;

Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer ;

Monson, Candice M. .

PARTNER ABUSE, 2014, 5 (04) :388-406

[8]

Bloomfield S., 2015, An outcome evaluation of the Integrated Domestic Abuse Programme (IDAP) and Community Domestic Violence Programme (CDVP)

[9]

Borenstein M., 2009, INTRO META ANAL, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470743386

[10]

Borenstein M, 2011, Comprehensive MetaAnalysis Version 2 Computer Software., V2.2.064

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 →