Evaluating the influence of biofuel and waste energy production on environmental degradation in APEC: Role of natural resources and financial development

被引:23
作者
Naqvi, Syed Asif Ali [1 ]
Hussain, Bilal [1 ]
Ali, Shafaqat [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Govt Coll Univ, Dept Econ, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
[2] Govt Coll Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
[3] China Med Univ, Dept Biol Sci & Technol, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
关键词
Biofuel and waste energy; Environmental degradation; Financial development; Natural resources; Asia pacific economic cooperation nations; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; RENEWABLE ENERGY; EMISSIONS NEXUS; KUZNETS CURVE; CO2; EMISSIONS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; TRADE OPENNESS; MIDDLE-EAST; PANEL-DATA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135790
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biofuel and waste energy is green energy and may significantly influence the environment. This article explores the effect of biofuel and waste energy energy production on environmental degradation with the role of natural resources and financial development in 14 Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation nations during the period 1990 to 2017. Various second-generation econometric approaches have been adopted to get robust and reliable results. Driscoll-Kraay standard errors technique's outcomes explore that biofuel and waste energy production has a negative and significant association with environmental degradation, and its 1% increase would reduce environmental degradation by -0.050%. The results also show that economic development, natural resources and financial development are positively correlated with the dependent variable, i.e., environmental degradation. As financial sector cannot effectively combat the environmental degradation so, checks and balances are strongly advocated for financial sector. Further, APEC governments should prioritize sustainable use of natural resources and address the overexploitation problem to attain optimal economic development. Overall study proposes Sustainable development goal-oriented policy framework for central authorities of chosen countries.
引用
收藏
页数:44
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   Industrial growth and emissions of CO2 in Ghana: The role of financial development and fossil fuel consumption [J].
Abokyi, Eric ;
Appiah-Konadu, Paul ;
Abokyi, Francis ;
Oteng-Abayie, Eric Fosu .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2019, 5 :1339-1353
[2]   Does financial development mitigate carbon emissions? Evidence from heterogeneous financial economies [J].
Acheampong, Alex O. ;
Amponsah, Mary ;
Boateng, Elliot .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 88
[3]   The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation [J].
Ahmad, Mahmood ;
Jiang, Ping ;
Majeed, Abdul ;
Umar, Muhammad ;
Khan, Zeeshan ;
Muhammad, Sulaman .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 69
[4]   Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia [J].
Ahmed, Zahoor ;
Wang, Zhaohua ;
Mahmood, Faisal ;
Hafeez, Muhammad ;
Ali, Nazakat .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (18) :18565-18582
[5]   Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe [J].
Alola, Andrew Adewale ;
Bekun, Festus Victor ;
Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 685 :702-709
[6]   Is the environmental Kuznets Curve in Europe related to the per-capita ecological footprint or CO2 emissions? [J].
Altintas, Halil ;
Kassouri, Yacouba .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 113
[7]   Energy Innovations-GHG Emissions Nexus: Fresh Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries [J].
Alvarez-Herranz, Agustin ;
Balsalobre, Daniel ;
Maria Cantos, Jose ;
Shahbaz, Muhammad .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 101 :90-100
[8]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[9]  
APEC, 2020, APEC CHARTS 2020
[10]  
APEC, 2019, APEC EN DEM SUPPL OU, V5th