Target acquisition performance comparison of active continuous-wave and range-gated imaging systems at 1.6 and 2.1 μm

被引:9
作者
Follansbee, Joshua [1 ]
Burrell, Derek [2 ]
Furxhi, Orges [3 ]
Renshaw, C. Kyle [4 ]
Lund, John [5 ]
Driggers, Ronald [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Opt Sci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Opt Sci, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Univ Cent Florida, CREOL Coll Opt & Photon, Orlando, FL USA
[5] Univ Alabama Huntsville, Huntsville, AL USA
[6] Univ Arizona, Wyant Coll Opt Sci, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
active imaging; shortwave infrared; extended shortwave infrared; range-gating; BACKSCATTER;
D O I
10.1117/1.OE.62.9.094107
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Active imaging systems can provide increased contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and targeting performance over passive systems in low-light and long-range applications. We use both a radiometric model and the Night Vision Integrated Performance Model to compare the performance of active continuous-wave (CW) and laser range-gated (LRG) imaging systems with laser illumination at 1.6 and 2.1 mu m, corresponding to the shortwave infrared (SWIR) and extended SWIR (eSWIR) bands, respectively. The imager performance is characterized by CNR as a function of range, as well as pixels-on-target. The modeling results demonstrate increased performance in the eSWIR band over the SWIR band in the majority of cases and increased performance for LRG systems over CW systems in all cases. The in-progress design of an active imaging testbed to confirm these modeling results with field imagery is discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Four-year aerosol observations with a Raman lidar at Thessaloniki, Greece, in the framework of European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET) [J].
Amiridis, V ;
Balis, DS ;
Kazadzis, S ;
Bais, A ;
Giannakaki, E ;
Papayannis, A ;
Zerefos, C .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2005, 110 (D21) :1-12
[2]   TRANSMISSION BY HAZE AND FOG IN THE SPECTRAL REGION 0.35 TO 10 MICRONS [J].
ARNULF, A ;
BRICARD, J ;
CURE, E ;
VERET, C .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1957, 47 (06) :491-498
[3]  
Attollo Engineering, 2022, Phoenix specification sheet
[4]  
Attollo Engineering, 2022, Griffin specification sheet
[5]   Extended spectrum SWIR camera with user-accessible Dewar [J].
Benapfl, Brendan ;
Miller, John Lester ;
Vemuri, Hari ;
Grein, Christoph ;
Sivananthan, Siva .
INFRARED TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS XLIII, 2017, 10177
[6]   MODTRAN®6: A major upgrade of the MODTRAN® radiative transfer code [J].
Berk, Alexander ;
Conforti, Patrick ;
Kennett, Rosemary ;
Perkins, Timothy ;
Hawes, Frederick ;
van den Bosch, Jeannette .
ALGORITHMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR MULTISPECTRAL, HYPERSPECTRAL, AND ULTRASPECTRAL IMAGERY XX, 2014, 9088
[7]   Lidar aerosol backscatter cross sections in the 2-mu m near-infrared wavelength region [J].
Chudamani, S ;
Spinhirne, JD ;
Clarke, AD .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1996, 35 (24) :4812-4819
[8]   Extended Wavelength SWIR Detectors with Reduced Dark Current [J].
Cohen, Noam ;
Aphek, Ori .
INFRARED TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS XLI, 2015, 9451
[9]   Intercomparison of pulsed lidar data with flight level CW lidar data and modeled backscatter from measured aerosol microphysics near Japan and Hawaii [J].
Cutten, DR ;
Spinhirne, JD ;
Menzies, RT ;
Bowdle, DA ;
Srivastava, V ;
Pueschel, RF ;
Clarke, AD ;
Rothermel, J .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D16) :19649-19661
[10]  
Driggers RG, 2012, ARTECH H APPL PHOTON, P1