On the importance of wind turbine wake boundary to wind energy and environmental impact

被引:11
作者
Fan, Zhun [1 ]
Li, Shan [1 ]
Gao, Zhiteng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Lijun [1 ]
Zheng, Xiaobo [2 ]
Zhu, Weijun [3 ]
Shen, Wenzhong [3 ,4 ]
Sjoholm, Mikael [4 ]
Mikkelsen, Torben Krogh [4 ]
Wang, Tongguang [5 ]
Li, Ye [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Naval Architecture Ocean & Civil Engn, Multifunct Towing Tank Lab, State Key Lab Ocean Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ Technol, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Lanzhou 730050, Peoples R China
[3] Yangzhou Univ, Coll Elect Energy & Power Engn, Yangzhou 225127, Peoples R China
[4] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Wind & Energy Syst, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[5] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Aerosp Engn, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
关键词
Wind energy; Energy production prediction; Wind farm planning; Environmental impact; Turbine wake; Pattern recognition; POWER; FARM; MODELS; FLOW; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; EFFICIENCY; TURBULENCE; NOISE; LES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116664
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The increase in global wind power installations has also increased the wind turbine density in wind farms. This has made the wake interactions between neighbouring turbines more significant and difficult to describe. Understanding wakes is important to predict the energy production and assess their environmental impacts. Although existing wake description methods can predict the average wind turbine wake under a high wind turbine density, they are unable to identify the wake boundary with an acceptable accuracy and computational cost. Consequently, the role of wake boundaries in modern wind farms has become unclear. To deal with this problem, this paper presents a comprehensive discussion on wind turbine wakes, especially the role of boundary identification in the wind farm planning stage. After a review of existing methods, an approach based on a newly derived mathematical formulation of the velocity field is proposed. Lidar-based field measurements and large-eddy simulations along with actuator line model-based numerical simulations were used to compare different wake boundary identification methods. The results show that the new approach is computationally cost-effective with a 5% increase in accuracy. The new approach also offers significant advantages as wake boundaries become increasingly complex.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 80 条
[21]   Comparative analysis and improvement of grid-based wind farm layout optimization [J].
Gualtieri, Giovanni .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 208
[22]   A data-driven analytical model for wind turbine wakes using machine learning method [J].
Guo Nai-Zhi ;
Zhang Ming-Ming ;
Li Bo .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 252
[23]   Low-order modelling of wake meandering behind turbines [J].
Gupta, Vikrant ;
Wan, Minping .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2019, 877 :534-560
[24]  
GWEC, 2021, GLOB OFFSH WIND REP
[25]   Wind turbine wake measurement in complex terrain [J].
Hansen, K. S. ;
Larsen, G. C. ;
Menke, R. ;
Vasiljevic, N. ;
Angelou, N. ;
Feng, J. ;
Zhu, W. J. ;
Vignaroli, A. ;
Liu, W. W. ;
Xu, C. ;
Shen, W. Z. .
SCIENCE OF MAKING TORQUE FROM WIND (TORQUE 2016), 2016, 753
[26]   A novel integrated approach for offshore wind power optimization [J].
He, Fenglan ;
Wagner, Markus ;
Zhang, Lijun ;
Shao, Changsheng ;
Xu, Wenhao ;
Chen, Weiqiu ;
Yan, Yun ;
Li, Ye .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2022, 266
[27]   High resolution wind turbine wake measurements with a scanning lidar [J].
Herges, T. G. ;
Maniaci, D. C. ;
Naughton, B. T. ;
Mikkelsen, T. ;
Sjoeholm, M. .
WAKE CONFERENCE 2017, 2017, 854
[28]   Saturation wind power potential and its implications for wind energy [J].
Jacobson, Mark Z. ;
Archer, Cristina L. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (39) :15679-15684
[29]  
Jensen NO, 1983, Riso-M No. 2411
[30]   Comparison and verification of wake models in an onshore wind farm considering single wake condition of the 2 MW wind turbine. [J].
Jeon, Sanghyeon ;
Kim, Bumsuk ;
Huh, Jongchul .
ENERGY, 2015, 93 :1769-1777