Aquatic vegetation types identified during early and late phases of vegetation recovery in the Upper Mississippi River

被引:2
|
作者
Larson, Danelle M. [1 ]
Carhart, Alicia M. [2 ]
Lund, Eric M. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, La Crosse, WI 54601 USA
[2] Wisconsin Dept Nat Resources, La Crosse, WI USA
[3] Minnesota Dept Nat Resources, Lake City Field Stn, Lake City, MN USA
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2023年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
aquatic plants; biocoenosis; cluster; community assembly; community type; macrophytes; phytocenosis; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; MACROPHYTES; FLOOD; PLANT; LAKES; CONSERVATION; SAGITTARIA; DYNAMICS; SYSTEM; REGIME;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.4468
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Assemblage patterns and processes of aquatic vegetation in most large floodplain rivers are not well understood, particularly after plant recovery. Identifying vegetation types, which are recurring plant groupings based on species composition, diversity, and abundances, can describe plant assembly patterns and environmental drivers that aid conservation planning and management. We used a 22-year dataset (n = 18,000 sampling plots) to identify aquatic vegetation types during an "early phase" and "late phase" of plant recovery at multiple spatial scales nested within a 500-km river reach of the Upper Mississippi River, USA. We hypothesized that vegetation types varied according to scale because of the stark environmental differences among riverine habitats and differing regional species pools along the river's latitudinal gradient, and that the late phase of recovery had developed several new vegetation types. We first used cluster analyses at multiple spatiotemporal scales to identify the number of vegetation types and their characteristics, such as indicator species, species compositions and abundances, and diversity index. Then we applied a multivariate regression to pinpoint environmental factors (such as hydrodynamics, system productivity, local habitat, and water quality) that structured those vegetation types. Clustering revealed that similar to 90% of plots irrespective of recovery phase were not classified into vegetation types, which indicated that most aquatic sampling plots are unique in species composition and unpredictable. However, impounded areas upriver from dams had matured five vegetation types: lotus (Nelumbo lutea Willd.), submersed (a mix of 11 common submersed species), watercelery (Vallisneria americana Michx.), arrowheads (Sagittaria rigida Pursh and Sagittaria latifolia Willd.), and a diverse community (with high diversity indices and multiple life forms). The vegetation types were associated with three environmental gradients related to inundation depth and duration, system productivity, and water clarity. These five vegetation types are known to be of high ecological value to fish and wildlife and thus targets for restoration, for example, the watercelery community is principal forage for migrating canvasback ducks (Aythya valisineria) along the Mississippi River flyway. Our results provide insights on vegetation assembly during recovery and aid habitat conservation by providing quantitative, environmental targets for restoration.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aquatic vegetation dynamics in the Upper Mississippi River over 2 decades spanning vegetation recovery
    Bouska, Kristen L.
    Larson, Danelle M.
    Drake, Deanne C.
    Lund, Eric M.
    Carhart, Alicia M.
    Bales, Kyle R.
    FRESHWATER SCIENCE, 2022, 41 (01) : 33 - 44
  • [2] AN ASSESSMENT OF THE AQUATIC AND WETLAND VEGETATION OF THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER
    PECK, JH
    SMART, MM
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1986, 136 : 57 - 75
  • [3] THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN AQUATIC VEGETATION COMMUNITY IN POOL 19, UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER
    TAZIK, PP
    ANDERSON, RV
    DAY, DM
    JOURNAL OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY, 1993, 8 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [4] Marsh vegetation types of the Mississippi River Deltaic Plain
    Jenneke M. Visser
    Charles E. Sasser
    Robert H. Chabreck
    R. G. Linscombe
    Estuaries, 1998, 21 : 818 - 828
  • [5] Marsh vegetation types of the Mississippi River Deltaic Plain
    Visser, JM
    Sasser, CE
    Chabreck, RH
    Linscombe, RG
    ESTUARIES, 1998, 21 (4B): : 818 - 828
  • [6] The effects of a record flood on the aquatic vegetation of the Upper Mississippi River System: Some preliminary findings
    Spink, A
    Rogers, S
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1996, 340 (1-3) : 51 - 57
  • [7] Synthesis of Upper Mississippi River System submersed and emergent aquatic vegetation: past, present, and future
    Megan Moore
    Susan P. Romano
    Thad Cook
    Hydrobiologia, 2010, 640 : 103 - 114
  • [8] Synthesis of Upper Mississippi River System submersed and emergent aquatic vegetation: past, present, and future
    Moore, Megan
    Romano, Susan P.
    Cook, Thad
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2010, 640 (01) : 103 - 114
  • [9] DECLINES IN AQUATIC VEGETATION IN NAVIGATION POOL NO-8, UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN 1975 AND 1991
    FISCHER, JR
    CLAFLIN, TO
    REGULATED RIVERS-RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 1995, 11 (02): : 157 - 165
  • [10] Summer nitrate uptake and denitrification in an upper Mississippi River backwater lake: the role of rooted aquatic vegetation
    Kreiling, Rebecca M.
    Richardson, William B.
    Cavanaugh, Jennifer C.
    Bartsch, Lynn A.
    BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 104 (1-3) : 309 - 324