A pricing and transshipment hybrid strategy for perishable product in two external scenarios for supply disruption

被引:1
作者
Sun, Qi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gao, Yaya [1 ]
Lu, Qihui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yan, Yingyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Business Adm, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Res Ctr Modern Business & Trade, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Enterprise Digital Intelligence & Business Anal Re, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Supply disruption; Learning-type external supply; Pricing strategy; Transshipment strategy; Hybrid strategy; INVENTORY CONTROL; MODEL; CHANNEL; RECOVERY; CHAINS;
D O I
10.1108/K-07-2022-0918
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
PurposeDifferent external supply scenarios faced by the retailers will affect their choice of strategy when supply is disrupted and becomes far less than demand, urgently. This study focuses on analyzing both demand and supply side response strategies to meet customer demand and reduce the impact of the shortage during supply disruptions.Design/methodology/approachAccording to the quantity of products that the external market can provide, the external supply scenarios were divided into sufficient-type external supply and learning-type external supply. A two-echelon perishable goods supply chain was analyzed, and three kinds of contingency strategy models for downstream retailers were investigated. First, in the sufficient external supply scenario, the optimal price and transshipment quantity to maximize retailer's profits is discussed. Second, in the scenario of learning-type external supply, this study analyzes the optimal decision in three mechanisms of the hybrid strategy and their application: price priority mechanism, quantity priority mechanism and price-quantity balance mechanism. Furthermore, the influence of penalty cost and supply on the priority orders of different mechanisms was studied.FindingsResults show that comparing the two pure strategies (pricing strategy and transshipment strategy)it was noted that the hybrid strategy produces the best results in sufficient-type external supply scenario. In the learning-type external supply scenario, a numerical study has shown the existence of three areas in case of penalty cost and supplier's capacity, and each areas has different priority orders of the three mechanisms. Under the situation of learning external supply, the retailer's optimal strategy is affected by parameters such as penalty cost and supply volume.Originality/valueThe main innovation of the work lies in the following: First; the external supply situation was divided into sufficiency type and learning type, which improves the external situation faced by retailers after the outbreak of emergencies, helps retailers understand the external situation, conforms to the actual situation and has certain practical application value. Second; in the context of learning external supply, there are three coping strategies for retailers, including: Price priority mechanism, Quantity priority mechanism and Pricing and transshipment balance mechanism. This will help retailers make strategic choices, make more scientific management decisions and improve the supply chain emergency management theory. Third; the demand side response was managed through the change of external supply during supply side recovery period and supply disruption. The proposed model enables managing and analyzing supply disruption efficiently and effectively via handling uncertainty by considering all aspects of decision-making process. The proposed model can be applied in various fields such as vegetable and fruit, fresh food, etc.
引用
收藏
页码:2107 / 2131
页数:25
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Behzad B., 2013, FRONT PLANT SCI, V1, P1
[2]   Effectiveness of responsive pricing in the face of supply chain disruptions [J].
Bugert, Niels ;
Lasch, Rainer .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 124 :304-315
[3]   An Image-Domain Least L1-Norm Method for Channel Error Effect Analysis and Calibration of Azimuth Multi-Channel SAR [J].
Cai, Yonghua ;
Deng, Yunkai ;
Zhang, Heng ;
Wang, Robert ;
Wu, Yulun ;
Cheng, Shuohan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 60
[4]   Supplier Diversification Under Buyer Risk [J].
Chod, Jiri ;
Trichakis, Nikolaos ;
Tsoukalas, Gerry .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (07) :3150-3173
[5]   An inventory model of supply chain disruption recovery with safety stock and carbon emission consideration [J].
Darom, Noraida Azura ;
Hishamuddin, Hawa ;
Ramli, Rizauddin ;
Nopiah, Zulkifli Mat .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 :1011-1021
[6]  
den Boer AV., 2015, Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, V20, P1
[7]   Optimisation models and information sharing in a multi-echelon pharmaceutical supply chain [J].
Elarbi, Mouna ;
Masmoudi, Malek ;
Ayadi, Omar ;
Masmoudi, Faouzi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, 2022, 14 (1-2) :56-77
[8]   INVENTORY OPTIMIZATION MODEL CONSIDERING CONSUMER SHIFT AND INVENTORY TRANSSHIPMENT IN DUAL-CHANNEL SUPPLY CHAINS [J].
Fan, Dandan ;
Xu, Qi ;
Fan, Tijun ;
Cheng, Fangzheng .
RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2019, 53 (01) :59-79
[9]   Combined pricing and inventory control under uncertainty [J].
Federgruen, A ;
Heching, A .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1999, 47 (03) :454-475
[10]   Transshipments:: An emerging inventory recourse to achieve supply chain leagility [J].
Herer, YT ;
Tzur, M ;
Yücesan, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2002, 80 (03) :201-212