Integrated assessment models and input-output analysis: bridging fields for advancing sustainability scenarios research

被引:11
作者
Lefevre, Julien [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, CNRS, Ecole Ponts ParisTech, AgroParisTech,CIRAD,EHESS,CIRED, Nogent Sur Marne, France
[2] Univ ParisSaclay, CNRS, Ecole PontsParisTech, CIRED,AgroParisTech,CIRAD,EHESS, 45 Bis,Ave Belle Gabrielle,Campus Jardin Tropical, Nogent Sur Marne 94736, France
关键词
Integrated Assessment Models; Input-output analysis; model linking; sustainability; climate mitigation scenarios; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL FOOTPRINTS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CLIMATE ACTION; PHASE-OUT; TRADE; EMISSIONS; CONSUMPTION; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.1080/09535314.2023.2266559
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Technology-rich Integrated assessment models (IAMs) and Environmentally-Extended Input-Output Analysis (EEIOA) are widely employed for sustainability analysis, each offering unique strengths. IAMs focus on forward-looking scenarios, exploring technological shifts and climate change mitigation costs. EEIOA provides more comprehensive but static assessments of environmental and socio-economic impacts throughout supply chains, adopting a lifecycle perspective. I conduct a literature review to assess the current state of IAM-IO integration, paving the way for future research opportunities with advanced models. Existing studies have loosely linked IAM and IO models to improve one field or the other. This perspective highlights the potential for more advanced IAM-IO model linking and identifies three domains within sustainability scenarios research where IAM-IO integration could play a crucial role: the energy-industry nexus in decarbonization pathways, multi-dimensional sustainability impact assessment and demand-side solutions and post-growth climate mitigation scenarios. The expected research insights may be pivotal to design effective sustainable policies.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 698
页数:24
相关论文
共 110 条
[71]  
Radzicki M.J., 2020, System Dynamics: Theory and Applications, P401, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8790-0_539
[72]   Income inequality projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) [J].
Rao, Narasimha D. ;
Sauer, Petra ;
Gidden, Matthew ;
Riahi, Keywan .
FUTURES, 2019, 105 :27-39
[73]   Decomposition Analysis of the Carbon Footprint of Primary Metals [J].
Rasul, Kajwan ;
Hertwich, Edgar G. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (19) :7391-7400
[74]   Air quality co-benefits of ratcheting up the NDCs [J].
Rauner, Sebastian ;
Hilaire, Jerome ;
Klein, David ;
Strefler, Jessica ;
Luderer, Gunnar .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (03) :1481-1500
[75]   Holistic energy system modeling combining multi-objective optimization and life cycle assessment [J].
Rauner, Sebastian ;
Budzinski, Maik .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 12 (12)
[76]  
Rocco M, 2018, Modelling Measurement and Control C, V79, P103, DOI [10.18280/mmc_c.790307, 10.18280/mmcc.790307, DOI 10.18280/MMCC.790307]
[77]   PRospective EnvironMental Impact asSEment (premise): A streamlined approach to producing databases for prospective life cycle assessment using integrated assessment models [J].
Sacchi, R. ;
Terlouw, T. ;
Siala, K. ;
Dirnaichner, A. ;
Bauer, C. ;
Cox, B. ;
Mutel, C. ;
Daioglou, V. ;
Luderer, G. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 160
[78]   Sufficiency in energy scenario studies: Taking the potential benefits of lifestyle changes into account [J].
Samadi, Sascha ;
Groene, Marie-Christine ;
Schneidewind, Uwe ;
Luhmann, Hans-Jochen ;
Venjakob, Johannes ;
Best, Benjamin .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 124 :126-134
[79]  
Sassi Olivier, 2010, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, V10, P5, DOI 10.1504/IJGENVI.2010.030566
[80]   Contribution of circular economy strategies to climate change mitigation: Generic assessment methodology with focus on developing countries [J].
Serrano, Teddy ;
Aparcana, Sandra ;
Bakhtiari, Fatemeh ;
Laurent, Alexis .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2021, 25 (06) :1382-1397