Cycle-by-cycle Delay Estimation at Signalized Intersections by using Machine Learning and Simulated Video Detection Data

被引:2
作者
Erdagi, Ismet Goksad [1 ]
Dobrota, Nemanja [2 ]
Gavric, Slavica [1 ]
Stevanovic, Aleksandar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Kittleson & Associates Inc, Washington, DC USA
来源
2023 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, MT-ITS | 2023年
关键词
performance measures; delay; machine learning; traffic; video detection; JUNCTIONS;
D O I
10.1109/MT-ITS56129.2023.10241732
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Accurate estimation of delay is crucial for efficient traffic signal operations. Estimation of delay in the real-time manner using traditional loop detectors requires advanced detectors (in addition to stop-bar detection). In cases when this detection layout is not in place, delay estimates are approximated with a lower accuracy. Video detection is one of the most frequently deployed detection systems at signalized intersections in recent years. In most cases video detection operates in the same way as traditional inductive loops. However, when coupled with computer vision algorithms, video detection systems could be used to retrieve additional information (e.g., vehicular arrivals and departures) that cannot be taken out from the conventional systems (e.g., long stop-bar loop detectors). Although present for several decades, video detection data were not frequently examined for delay estimation purposes. In this study, we proposed a novel delay estimation model which can be developed with only data from stop-bar video detectors. Relevant data were collected from a simulation model of 11 signalized intersections at downtown Chattanooga, TN and processed to create needed inputs for model development. With the use of multigene genetic programming the authors developed a delay model that outperforms accuracy of multi regression model. Furthermore, authors evaluated the developed model by comparison with the other benchmark delay models, such as HCM and approach delay model. It was found that the developed MGGP delay model outperforms benchmark models for a wide range of traffic and signal operation conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Akcelik R., 1981, Australian Road Research Board, Research Report 123
[2]   Bezier Search Differential Evolution algorithm based estimation models of delay parameter k for signalized intersections [J].
Akgungor, Ali Payidar ;
Korkmaz, Ersin .
CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2022, 34 (13)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Highway Capacity Manual
[4]  
ATKINS, 2020, Automated Traffic Signal Performance Measures Reporting Details, P65
[5]   Vehicle Delay Estimation at Signalized Intersections Using Machine Learning Algorithms [J].
Bagdatli, Muhammed Emin Cihangir ;
Dokuz, Ahmet Sakir .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2021, 2675 (09) :110-126
[6]   Vehicle Delay Modeling at Signalized Intersections with Gene-Expression Programming [J].
Bagdatli, Muhammed Emin Cihangir .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING PART A-SYSTEMS, 2020, 146 (09)
[7]  
Balke K. N., 2005, Development of a Traffic Signal Performance Measurement System (TSPMS)
[8]  
Clayton Arthur John Hamblin, 1941, Journal of the Institution of Civil Engineers
[9]   Computational Efficiency of Alternative Algorithms for Arterial Offset Optimization [J].
Day, Christopher M. ;
Bullock, Darcy M. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2011, (2259) :37-47
[10]   Comparison of delay estimates at under-saturated and over-saturated pre-timed signalized intersections [J].
Dion, F ;
Rakha, H ;
Kang, YS .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2004, 38 (02) :99-122