Practices of Care in Participatory Design With Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Digitally Mediated Study

被引:3
作者
Paluch, Richard [1 ,3 ]
Cerna, Katerina [2 ]
Kirschsieper, Dennis [1 ]
Mueller, Claudia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siegen, IT Ageing Soc, Informat Syst, Siegen, Germany
[2] Halmstad Univ, Sch Informat Technol, Intelligent Syst & Digital Design, Halmstad, Sweden
[3] Univ Siegen, IT Ageing Soc, Informat Syst, Kohlbettstr 15, D-57072 Siegen, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
older adults; care; Participatory Design; COVID-19; pandemic; digital health intervention; aging; health technology; digital media; gerontology; mobile phone; HCI;
D O I
10.2196/45750
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Participatory Design (PD), albeit an established approach in User-Centered Design, comes with specific challenges when working with older adults as research participants. Addressing these challenges relates to the reflection and negotiation of the positionalities of the researchers and research participants and includes various acts of giving and receiving help. During the COVID-19 pandemic, facets of positionalities and (mutual) care became particularly evident in qualitative and participatory research settings. Objective: The aim of this paper was to systematically analyze care practices of participatory (design) research, which are to different extents practices of the latter. Using a multiyear PD project with older people that had to take place remotely over many months, we specify different practices of care; how they relate to collaborative work in the design project; and represent foundational practices for sustainable, long-term co-design. Our research questions were "How can digitally-mediated PD work during Methods: Our data comes from the Joint Programming Initiative "More Years, Better Lives" (JPI MYBL), a European Union project that aims to promote digital literacy and technology appropriation among older adults in domestic settings. It targeted the cocreation, by older adults and university researchers, of a mobile demo kit website with cocreated resources, aimed at improving the understanding of use options of digital tools. Through a series of workshops, a range of current IT products was explored by a group of 21 older adults, which served as the basis for joint cocreative work on generating design ideas and prototypes. We reflect on the PD process and examine how the actors enact and manifest care. Results: The use of digital technology allowed the participatory project to continue during the COVID-19 pandemic and accentuated the digital skills of older adults and the improvement of digital literacy as part of "care." We provide empirically based evidence of PD with older adults developing digital literacy and sensitizing concepts, based on the notion of care by Tronto for differentiating aspects and processes of care. The data suggest that it is not enough to focus solely on the technologies and how they are used; it is also necessary to focus on the social structures in which help is available and in which technologies offer Conclusions: We document that the cocreation of different digital media tools can be used to provide a community with mutual care. Our study demonstrates how research participants effectively enact different forms of care and how such "care" is a necessary basis for a genuinely participatory approach, which became especially meaningful as a form of support during COVID-19. We reflect on how notions of "care" and "caring" that were central to the pandemic response are also central to PD.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Ahmad Nahdatul Akma, 2022, SN Comput Sci, V3, P130, DOI [10.1007/s42979-022-01016-0, 10.1007/s42979-022-01016-0]
[2]   Participation as a matter of concern in participatory design [J].
Andersen, Lars Bo ;
Danholt, Peter ;
Halskov, Kim ;
Hansen, Nicolai Brodersen ;
Lauritsen, Peter .
CODESIGN-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COCREATION IN DESIGN AND THE ARTS, 2015, 11 (3-4) :250-261
[3]  
[Anonymous], Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Int. TabNet Architecture Consisting of the Encoder for Classification
[4]  
Araujo R, 2023, PERSPECTIVES DESIGN, P105
[5]   "What Do You Need? What Are You Experiencing?" Relationship Building and Power Dynamics in Participatory Research Projects: Critical Self-Reflections of Researchers [J].
Arnold, Doris ;
Glaessel, Andrea ;
Boettger, Tabea ;
Sarma, Navina ;
Bethmann, Andreas ;
Narimani, Petra .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (15)
[6]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[7]  
Bangert AS, 2022, P 2022 IEEE INT SMAR, P1, DOI [10.1109/isc255366.2022.9922123, DOI 10.1109/ISC255366.2022.9922123]
[8]  
Bannon L, 2018, ACM T COMPUT-HUM INT, V25, DOI [10.1145/3177794, 10.1145/3152421]
[9]   eHealth Literacy: From Theory to Clinical Application for Digital Health Improvement. Results from the ACCESS Training Experience [J].
Bevilacqua, Roberta ;
Strano, Stefano ;
Di Rosa, Mirko ;
Giammarchi, Cinzia ;
Cerna, Katerina Katka ;
Mueller, Claudia ;
Maranesi, Elvira .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (22)
[10]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238]