Cultural adaptation of the revised Basel Instrument for Rationing of Care to the Turkish context: a study of validity and reliability

被引:1
作者
Yurumezoglu, Havva Arslan [1 ,4 ]
Schubert, Maria [2 ]
Sarioglu, Emine [3 ]
Kocaman, Gulseren [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Nursing, Dept Nursing Management, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Zurich Univ Appl Sci, Inst Nursing, Sch Hlth Profess, Winterthur, Switzerland
[3] Katip Celebi Univ Ataturk Training & Res Hosp, Dept Res & Educ, Nurse, Izmir, Turkiye
[4] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Nursing, Dept Nursing Management, Inciralti Campus, TR-35330 Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
factor analysis; instrument adaptation; nursing; rationing care; reliability; validity; MISSED NURSING-CARE; PATIENT OUTCOMES; LEFT UNDONE; INDICATOR; EXTENT;
D O I
10.1177/17449871231175788
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Studies have shown that nurses do not complete one or more necessary nursing care elements in their last shift due to lack of time. The Basel Extent of Rationing Nursing Care (BERNCA) instrument is one of the most used scales to measure the rationing of nursing care. Aim: This study is aimed to culturally adapt the revised BERNCA (BERNCA-R) instrument to the Turkish language and to test its validity and reliability. Methods: A cross-sectional and methodological study was used. The instrument was adapted in three stages: translation and adaptation, content validity testing and validity and reliability. Data were obtained from 350 nurses working in two public acute care hospitals in Turkey, between September 2019 and January 2020. The descriptive statistics, content validity index, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Cronbach's & alpha;, Guttman split-half and inter-item reliability analyses were performed for the analysis of the data. Results: The Turkish version of the BERNCA-R instrument with a 27-item and three-subscales (monitoring, daily care and needs and psychosocial care) structure was found to have acceptable and good fit indices. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the BERNCA-R instrument is valid and reliable tool to measure rationing of nursing care.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 351
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [11] Missed nursing care: a concept analysis
    Kalisch, Beatrice J.
    Landstrom, Gay L.
    Hinshaw, Ada Sue
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2009, 65 (07) : 1509 - 1517
  • [12] Missed nursing care - A qualitative study
    Kalisch, Beattlce J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2006, 21 (04) : 306 - 313
  • [13] Kline R. B., 2015, Methodology in the social sciences
  • [14] Development of the practice environment scale of the Nursing Work Index
    Lake, ET
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2002, 25 (03) : 176 - 188
  • [15] Pett M. A., 2003, MAKING SENSE FACTOR
  • [16] Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations
    Polit, Denise F.
    Beek, Cheryl Tatano
    Owen, Steven V.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2007, 30 (04) : 459 - 467
  • [17] The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations
    Polit, Denise F.
    Beck, Cheryl Tatano
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2006, 29 (05) : 489 - 497
  • [18] What impact does nursing care left undone have on patient outcomes? Review of the literature
    Recio-Saucedo, Alejandra
    Dall'Ora, Chiara
    Maruotti, Antonello
    Ball, Jane
    Briggs, Jim
    Meredith, Paul
    Redfern, Oliver C.
    Kovacs, Caroline
    Prytherch, David
    Smith, Gary B.
    Griffiths, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (11-12) : 2248 - 2259
  • [19] Schubert M., 2005, RICH NURSING STUDY R
  • [20] Rationing of nursing care and its relationship to patient outcomes: the Swiss extension of the International Hospital Outcomes Study
    Schubert, Maria
    Glass, Tracy R.
    Clarke, Sean P.
    Aiken, Linda H.
    Schaffert-Witvliet, Bianca
    Sloane, Douglas M.
    De Geest, Sabina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 20 (04) : 227 - 237