The Role of Valuation Specialists in Audits of Fair Values and Potential for Change under Amended Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Standards

被引:3
作者
Griffith, Emily E. [1 ]
Hammersley, Jacqueline S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Wisconsin Sch Business, Dept Accounting & Informat Syst, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Terry Coll Business, JM Tull Sch Accounting, Atlanta, GA USA
来源
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY | 2023年 / 42卷 / 02期
关键词
accounting estimates; auditing; fair value; specialist; auditing standards; PCAOB; COMMITTEE; WORK;
D O I
10.2308/AJPT-19-100
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The PCAOB recently implemented amended standards on the use of valuation specialists. We report interviews with 42 auditors and valuation specialists in which we describe the role of valuation specialists and problems during fair value audits under the original guidance. We evaluate whether the amended guidance will change practice and mitigate these problems. We find that specialists are more involved in fieldwork relative to planning and completion. Despite changes to communication and review requirements, specialists' limited role in making conclusions relative to auditors will continue. Our analysis suggests the changes in standards are unlikely to meaningfully change practice. We expect little change because the amended standards will not increase specialists' responsibility for outcomes or provide them additional guidance, they will not require auditors to acquire valuation knowledge, and they cannot reduce the inherent uncertainty in fair value settings. These issues underlie many of the problems in this area.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 161
页数:29
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Barr -Pulliam D., 2022, JOINT EFFECTS WORK C
  • [2] One Team or Two? Investigating Relationship Quality between Auditors and IT Specialists: Implications for Audit Team Identity and the Audit Process
    Bauer, Tim D.
    Estep, Cassandra
    Malsch, Bertrand
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2019, 36 (04) : 2142 - 2171
  • [3] Auditors' and Specialists' Views About the Use of Specialists During an Audit
    Boritz, J. Efrim
    Kochetova, Natalia V.
    Robinson, Linda A.
    Wong, Christopher
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING, 2020, 32 (02) : 15 - 40
  • [4] The Audit of Fair Values and Other Estimates: The Effects of Underlying Environmental, Task, and Auditor-Specific Factors
    Bratten, Brian
    Gaynor, Lisa Milici
    McDaniel, Linda
    Montague, Norma R.
    Sierra, Gregory E.
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2013, 32 : 7 - 44
  • [5] Auditing Challenging Fair Value Measurements: Evidence from the Field
    Cannon, Nathan H.
    Bedard, Jean C.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 92 (04) : 81 - 114
  • [6] Extreme Estimation Uncertainty in Fair Value Estimates: Implications for Audit Assurance
    Christensen, Brant E.
    Glover, Steven M.
    Wood, David A.
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2012, 31 (01): : 127 - 146
  • [7] The Nominating Committee Process: A Qualitative Examination of Board Independence and Formalization
    Clune, Richard
    Hermanson, Dana R.
    Tompkins, James G.
    Ye, Zhongxia
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2014, 31 (03) : 748 - 786
  • [8] Gensler G., 2022, STATEMENT PROPOSED M
  • [9] Mind the Gap: Why Do Experts Have Differences of Opinion Regarding the Sufficiency of Audit Evidence Supporting Complex Fair Value Measurements?
    Glover, Steven M.
    Taylor, Mark H.
    Wu, Yi-Jing
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2019, 36 (03) : 1417 - 1460
  • [10] Current Practices and Challenges in Auditing Fair Value Measurements and Complex Estimates: Implications for Auditing Standards and the Academy
    Glover, Steven M.
    Taylor, Mark H.
    Wu, Yi-Jing
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2017, 36 (01): : 63 - 84