Efficacy of rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine based on triptan treatment experience: Pooled results from three phase 3 randomized clinical trials

被引:20
|
作者
Lipton, Richard B. [1 ,2 ,3 ,8 ]
Blumenfeld, Andrew [4 ]
Jensen, Christopher M. [5 ]
Croop, Robert [5 ]
Thiry, Alexandra [5 ]
L'Italien, Gilbert [5 ]
Morris, Beth A. [5 ]
Coric, Vladimir [5 ]
Goadsby, Peter J. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Neurol, Bronx, NY USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol, Bronx, NY USA
[3] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Bronx, NY USA
[4] Headache Ctr Southern Calif, Carlsbad, CA USA
[5] Biohaven Pharmaceut, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Kings Coll London, Kings Coll Hosp, SLaM Biomed Res Ctr, NIHR SLaM Clin Res Facil, London, England
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Neurol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[8] Albert Einstein Coll Med, 1165 Morris Pk Ave,Rousso Bldg,Room 332, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
关键词
Migraine; efficacy; acute; rimegepant; triptan; EPISODIC MIGRAINE; RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; DOUBLE-BLIND; USERS; US; SATISFACTION; PREVALENCE; PATTERNS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1177/03331024221141686
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThis post-hoc analysis from three phase 3 treatment trials of rimegepant 75 mg - an oral small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for acute and preventive treatment of migraine - assessed efficacy in adults with migraine based on triptan treatment experience. MethodsParticipants were assigned to one of four groups based on triptan treatment experience: insufficient response (e.g. lack of efficacy and/or poor tolerability) to 1 triptan, insufficient response to >= 2 triptans, current triptan users, and triptan-naive participants. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were pain freedom and most bothersome symptom freedom at two hours postdose. ResultsIn the three trials (N = 3507; rimegepant n = 1749, placebo n = 1758), 1235 (35.2%) participants had a history of insufficient response to 1 triptan (n = 910 [25.9%]) or >= 2 triptans (n = 325 [9.3%]), and 2272 (64.8%) had no history of insufficient response to triptans (current use = 595 [17.0%], naive = 1677 [47.8%]). Rimegepant was effective on the co-primary endpoints in all subgroups (p <= 0.013), except for freedom from the most bothersome symptom in the triptan-naive group (p = 0.06). No differences on co-primary endpoints were found in pairwise comparisons of rimegepant-treated participants. ConclusionsRimegepant was effective for the acute treatment of migraine in adults with a history of insufficient response to 1 or >= 2 triptans and in current triptan users. Efficacy on co-primary endpoints did not differ based on the number of insufficient triptan responses.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03235479, NCT03237845, NCT03461757
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sustained benefits of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in chronic migraine: An analysis of the pooled Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy (PREEMPT) randomized controlled trials
    Silberstein, Stephen D.
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    Dodick, David W.
    Sommer, Katherine
    Lipton, Richard B.
    HEADACHE, 2024, 64 (07): : 838 - 848
  • [32] Lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine in patients with cardiovascular risk factors: post-hoc analysis of pooled results from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials
    Shapiro, Robert E.
    Hochstetler, Helen M.
    Dennehy, Ellen B.
    Khanna, Rashna
    Doty, Erin Gautier
    Berg, Paul H.
    Starling, Amaal J.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [33] Lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine in patients with cardiovascular risk factors: post-hoc analysis of pooled results from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials
    Robert E. Shapiro
    Helen M. Hochstetler
    Ellen B. Dennehy
    Rashna Khanna
    Erin Gautier Doty
    Paul H. Berg
    Amaal J. Starling
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2019, 20
  • [34] Suvorexant in Patients with Insomnia: Pooled Analyses of Three-Month Data from Phase-3 Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials
    Herring, W. Joseph
    Connor, Kathleen M.
    Snyder, Ellen
    Snavely, Duane B.
    Zhang, Ying
    Hutzelmann, Jill
    Matzura-Wolfe, Deborah
    Benca, Ruth M.
    Krystal, Andrew D.
    Walsh, James K.
    Lines, Christopher
    Roth, Thomas
    Michelson, David
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SLEEP MEDICINE, 2016, 12 (09): : 1215 - 1225
  • [35] Post Hoc Subanalysis of Two Randomized, Controlled Phase 3 Trials Evaluating Diclofenac Potassium for Oral Solution: Impact of Migraine-Associated Nausea and Prior Triptan Use on Efficacy
    Lipton, Richard B.
    Schmidt, Pete
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    HEADACHE, 2017, 57 (05): : 756 - 765
  • [36] The efficacy and safety of atogepant for the prophylactic treatment of migraine: evidence from randomized controlled trials
    Tao, Xinyu
    Yan, Zeya
    Meng, Jiahao
    Wang, Wei
    Dai, Qiling
    Zhou, Qiufeng
    Wang, Zhifeng
    Wang, Zhong
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [37] Secukinumab in the Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis: Results of Three Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials
    Dick, Andrew D.
    Tugal-Tutkun, Ilknur
    Foster, Stephen
    Zierhut, Manfred
    Liew, S. H. Melissa
    Bezlyak, Vladimir
    Androudi, Sofia
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 120 (04) : 777 - 787
  • [38] A randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of intramuscular droperidol for the treatment of acute migraine headache
    Richman, PB
    Allegra, J
    Eskin, B
    Doran, J
    Reischel, U
    Kaiafas, C
    Nashed, AH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 20 (01) : 39 - 42
  • [39] OnabotulinumtoxinA for Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Pooled Results From the Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phases of the PREEMPT Clinical Program
    Dodick, David W.
    Turkel, Catherine C.
    DeGryse, Ronald E.
    Aurora, Sheena K.
    Silberstein, Stephen D.
    Lipton, Richard B.
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    Brin, Mitchell F.
    HEADACHE, 2010, 50 (06): : 921 - 936
  • [40] Acute Treatment of Migraine with Celecoxib Oral Solution: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
    Lipton, Richard B.
    Munjal, Sagar
    Dodick, David W.
    Tepper, Stewart J.
    Serrano, Daniel
    Iaconangelo, Charlie
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 549 - 560