Knowledge management tools and mechanisms for evidence-informed decision-making in the WHO European Region: a scoping review

被引:4
作者
El-Jardali, Fadi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bou-Karroum, Lama [1 ,2 ]
Hilal, Nadeen [2 ]
Hammoud, Maya [1 ]
Hemadi, Nour [2 ]
Assal, Michelle [2 ]
Kalach, Nour [2 ]
Harb, Aya [2 ]
Azzopardi-Muscat, Natasha [4 ]
Sy, Tyrone Reden [4 ]
Novillo-Ortiz, David [4 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Fac Hlth Sci, Knowledge Policy Ctr, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] WHO Reg Off Europe, Div Country Hlth Pol & Syst, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Evidence-informed decision-making; Knowledge management; WHO European Region; Scoping review; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; PUBLIC-HEALTH; POLICY-MAKING; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; BIG DATA; CARE; NETWORK; SUPPORT; REGISTRIES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-023-01058-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundKnowledge management (KM) emerged as a strategy to promote evidence-informed decision-making. This scoping review aims to map existing KM tools and mechanisms used to promote evidence-informed health decision-making in the WHO European Region and identify knowledge gaps.MethodsFollowing the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance for conducting scoping reviews, we searched Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and Open Grey. We conducted a descriptive analysis of the general characteristics of the included papers and conducted narrative analysis of the included studies and categorized studies according to KM type and phase.ResultsOut of 9541 citations identified, we included 141 studies. The KM tools mostly assessed are evidence networks, surveillance tools, observatories, data platforms and registries, with most examining KM tools in high-income countries of the WHO European region. Findings suggest that KM tools can identify health problems, inform health planning and resource allocation, increase the use of evidence by policymakers and stimulate policy discussion.ConclusionPolicymakers and funding agencies are called to support capacity-building activities, and future studies to strengthen KM in the WHO European region particularly in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. An updated over-arching strategy to coordinate KM activities in the WHO European region will be useful in these efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Challenges to evidence-informed decision-making in the context of pandemics: qualitative study of COVID-19 policy advisor perspectives
    Vickery, Jamie
    Atkinson, Paul
    Lin, Leesa
    Rubin, Olivier
    Upshur, Ross
    Yeoh, Eng-Kiong
    Boyer, Chris
    Errett, Nicole A.
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2022, 7 (04):
  • [42] Evaluating the impact of an intensive education workshop on evidence-informed decision making knowledge, skills, and behaviours: a mixed methods study
    Yost, Jennifer
    Ciliska, Donna
    Dobbins, Maureen
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 14
  • [43] Evaluating the impact of an intensive education workshop on evidence-informed decision making knowledge, skills, and behaviours: a mixed methods study
    Jennifer Yost
    Donna Ciliska
    Maureen Dobbins
    [J]. BMC Medical Education, 14
  • [44] The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review
    Kneale, Dylan
    Rojas-Garcia, Antonio
    Raine, Rosalind
    Thomas, James
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
  • [45] What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review
    Michelle M. Haby
    Evelina Chapman
    Rachel Clark
    Jorge Barreto
    Ludovic Reveiz
    John N. Lavis
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 14
  • [46] What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review
    Haby, Michelle M.
    Chapman, Evelina
    Clark, Rachel
    Barreto, Jorge
    Reveiz, Ludovic
    Lavis, John N.
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2016, 14
  • [47] How generalist nurses inform their clinical decision-making in wound management: a scoping review
    Vains, Adeline S.
    Finlayson, Kathleen
    [J]. WOUND PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2022, 30 (02): : 112 - 118
  • [48] Implementation strategies to address barriers to evidence-informed symptom management among outpatient oncology nurses: a scoping review protocol
    Teggart, Kylie
    Bryant-Lukosius, Denise
    Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E.
    Ganann, Rebecca
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [49] Barriers, facilitators and views about next steps to implementing supports for evidence-informed decision-making in health systems: a qualitative study
    Moriah E Ellen
    Grégory Léon
    Gisèle Bouchard
    Mathieu Ouimet
    Jeremy M Grimshaw
    John N Lavis
    [J]. Implementation Science, 9
  • [50] Shared decision-making related to treatment of haemophilia: A scoping review of influential factors and available support tools
    Sun, Haowei
    Klaassen, Robert J.
    Anger, Dana L.
    Mendell, Ari L.
    Olatunde, Shade
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2024, 30 (04) : 880 - 893