The misinformation recognition and response model: an emerging theoretical framework for investigating antecedents to and consequences of misinformation recognition

被引:7
作者
Amazeen, Michelle A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Mass Commun Advertising & Publ Relat, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
misinformation; fact-checking; corrections; persuasion; information processing; FACT-CHECKING; PERSUASION KNOWLEDGE; SITUATIONAL THEORY; PARTISAN BIAS; FAKE NEWS; RESISTANCE; TRUTH; CREDIBILITY; BELIEFS; MISPERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1093/hcr/hqad040
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Although research on misinformation and corrections has recently proliferated, no systematic structure has guided the examination of conditions under which misinformation is most likely to be recognized and the potential ensuing effects of recognition. The Misinformation Recognition and Response Model (MRRM) provides a framework for investigating the antecedents to and consequences of misinformation recognition. The model theorizes that how people cope with exposure to misinformation and/or intervention messages is conditioned by both dispositional and situational individual characteristics and is part of a process mediated by informational problem identification, issue motivation, and-crucially-recognition of misinformation. Whether or not recognition is activated then triggers differential cognitive coping strategies which ultimately affect consequent cognitive, affective, and behavioral outcomes. Working to explore the notion of misinformation will be more fruitful if researchers take into consideration how various perspectives fit together and form a larger picture. The MRRM offers guidance on a multi-disciplinary understanding of recognizing and responding to misinformation.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 229
页数:12
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [31] COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
    FESTINGER, L
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1962, 207 (04) : 93 - &
  • [32] The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics
    Flynn, D. J.
    Nyhan, Brendan
    Reifler, Jason
    [J]. POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 38 : 127 - 150
  • [33] Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire: How Fact-Checking Influences Citizens' Reactions to Negative Advertising
    Fridkin, Kim
    Kenney, Patrick J.
    Wintersieck, Amanda
    [J]. POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2015, 32 (01) : 127 - 151
  • [34] Gender Differences in Reactions to Fact Checking of Negative Commercials
    Fridkin, Kim L.
    Courey, Jillian
    Hernandez, Samantha
    Spears, Joshua
    [J]. POLITICS & GENDER, 2016, 12 (02) : 369 - 390
  • [35] THE PERSUASION KNOWLEDGE MODEL - HOW PEOPLE COPE WITH PERSUASION ATTEMPTS
    FRIESTAD, M
    WRIGHT, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1994, 21 (01) : 1 - 31
  • [36] Undermining the Corrective Effects of Media-Based Political Fact Checking? The Role of Contextual Cues and Naive Theory
    Garrett, R. Kelly
    Nisbet, Erik C.
    Lynch, Emily K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2013, 63 (04) : 617 - 637
  • [37] Graves L., 2019, Oxford research encyclopedia of communication, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190228613.013.808
  • [38] Graves L., 2016, Deciding What's True: The Rise of Political Fact Checking in American Journalism
  • [39] Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook
    Guess, Andrew
    Nagler, Jonathan
    Tucker, Joshua
    [J]. SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2019, 5 (01):
  • [40] Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election
    Guess, Andrew M.
    Nyhan, Brendan
    Reifler, Jason
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2020, 4 (05) : 472 - 480