Farmers' acceptance of robotics and unmanned aerial vehicles: A systematic review

被引:10
作者
Degieter, Margo [1 ,2 ]
De Steur, Hans [1 ]
Tran, Duc [1 ]
Gellynck, Xavier [1 ]
Schouteten, Joachim J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Div Agrifood Mkt & Chain Management, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Div Agrifood Mkt & Chain Management, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
USER ACCEPTANCE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; AGRICULTURE; DRONES; EASE;
D O I
10.1002/agj2.21427
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Recently, new agricultural technologies have emerged to increase sustainable food production, often referred to as "Agriculture 4.0." They consist of more advanced precision agriculture technologies, such as sensors, robotics, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which can lead to environmental and economic benefits for farmers and society. Despite the potential benefits of Agriculture 4.0 technologies, the adoption rate remains low. The objective of this study was to gain insight into the factors affecting the adoption of agricultural field robotics and UAVs using a systematic literature review approach that analyzed 23 relevant studies identified from two scientific databases (i.e., Web of Science and Scopus). Data regarding methodological aspects and results were extracted. Even though the current adoption of agricultural robots and UAVs is still limited, farmers seem highly interested. Most studies have used a quantitative approach to study the intention to adopt or the adoption of robotics or UAVs. Surprisingly, few studies have used an existing theory to explain the (intended) adoption. Age, gender, income, education, farm size, perceived usefulness, expected economic and environmental benefits, an attitude of confidence, and the perceived ease of use have been the internal factors most often identified. Meanwhile, the price of the technology, compatibility with other software and equipment, and labor scarcity are the most important external factors.
引用
收藏
页码:2159 / 2173
页数:15
相关论文
共 70 条
[21]   Agro-Livestock Farming System Sustainability during the COVID-19 Era: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Role of Information and Communication Technologies [J].
Hashem, Nesrein M. ;
Hassanein, Eman M. ;
Hocquette, Jean-Francois ;
Gonzalez-Bulnes, Antonio ;
Ahmed, Fayrouz A. ;
Attia, Youssef A. ;
Asiry, Khalid A. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (12)
[22]  
Kester C, 2013, PRECISION AGRICULTURE '13, P785
[23]   A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda [J].
Klerkx, Laurens ;
Jakku, Emma ;
Labarthe, Pierre .
NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2019, 90-91
[24]  
Koutsos T, 2019, INT J AGRIC ENVIRON, V10, P40, DOI [10.4018/IJAEIS.2019010103, 10.4018/ijaeis.2019010103]
[25]  
Lim Weng Marc, 2018, Australasian Journal of Information Systems, V22, P1
[26]   Farmers' technology preference and influencing factors for pesticide reduction: evidence from Hubei Province, China [J].
Liu, Di ;
Huang, Yanzhong ;
Luo, Xiaofeng .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (03) :6424-6434
[27]   Economics of autonomous equipment for arable farms [J].
Lowenberg-DeBoer, James ;
Franklin, Kit ;
Behrendt, Karl ;
Godwin, Richard .
PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2021, 22 (06) :1992-2006
[28]   Economics of robots and automation in field crop production [J].
Lowenberg-DeBoer, James ;
Huang, Iona Yuelu ;
Grigoriadis, Vasileios ;
Blackmore, Simon .
PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2020, 21 (02) :278-299
[29]   Future agricultural systems and the role of digitalization for achieving sustainability goals. A review [J].
MacPherson, Joseph ;
Voglhuber-Slavinsky, Ariane ;
Olbrisch, Mathias ;
Schoebel, Philipp ;
Doenitz, Ewa ;
Mouratiadou, Ioanna ;
Helming, Katharina .
AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 42 (04)
[30]   Robotics and labour in agriculture. A context consideration [J].
Marinoudi, Vasso ;
Sorensen, Claus G. ;
Pearson, Simon ;
Bochtis, Dionysis .
BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2019, 184 :111-121