Exploring the determinants of corporate green bond issuance and its environmental implication: The role of corporate board

被引:40
作者
Garcia, C. Jose [1 ]
Herrero, Begona [1 ]
Miralles-Quiros, Jose Luis [2 ]
Mirallles-Quiros, Maria del Mar [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Dept Corp Finance, Ave dels Tarongers S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
[2] Univ Extremadura, Fac Econ & Business Sci, Badajoz 06006, Spain
关键词
Green bonds; Signalling; Greenwashing; Corporate board; Women directors; PERFORMANCE; DIRECTORS; AGENCY; FIRM; COMPENSATION; DIVERSITY; COMMITTEE;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122379
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The exponential growth of the green bond market has generated an incipient debate in the literature about the causes and implications for companies employing this green financing. An unexplored issue is the role of the board. In this context, the aim of this research is two-fold. Firstly, we analyse whether companies that have issued green bonds during the 2013-2021 period are characterised over the previous two years by having certain corporate governance characteristics, such as having a sustainability committee or a board with a higher percentage of women. Secondly, we examine whether these companies improve their environmental performance post-issuance by considering these governance characteristics, as well as the certification of green bonds and the purpose of the funds. For this purpose, we employ up to five alternative environmental performance variables. Our overall results indicate that companies that issue green bonds have a higher environmental score, a lower volume of CO2 emissions, a board with a higher percentage of women and a sustainability committee. Moreover, such companies continue to perform certain environmentally friendly actions in the years after issuance. Furthermore, the results reflect that companies with poorer environmental scores may be using external certification of their emissions to improve their image.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[31]   Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? A study of EU firms [J].
Jose Garcia Martin, C. ;
Herrero, Begona .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (01) :74-94
[32]   Where's the greenium? [J].
Larcker, David F. ;
Watts, Edward M. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2020, 69 (2-3)
[33]  
Li Kai., 2007, Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, VI, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-53265-7.50016-0
[34]   Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure [J].
Liao, Lin ;
Luo, Le ;
Tang, Qingliang .
BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2015, 47 (04) :409-424
[35]   Is there a green premium in the green bond market? Systematic literature review revealing premium determinants [J].
MacAskill, S. ;
Roca, E. ;
Liu, B. ;
Stewart, R. A. ;
Sahin, O. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 280
[36]   Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: an empirical investigation of the US Best Corporate Citizens [J].
Mallin, Christine A. ;
Michelon, Giovanna .
ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2011, 41 (02) :119-144
[37]   Understanding the role of green bonds in advancing sustainability [J].
Maltais, Aaron ;
Nykvist, Bjorn .
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FINANCE & INVESTMENT, 2021, 11 (03) :233-252
[38]   Chipping away at the Glass Ceiling: Gender Spillovers in Corporate Leadership [J].
Matsa, David A. ;
Miller, Amalia R. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (03) :635-639
[39]   The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure [J].
Giovanna Michelon ;
Antonio Parbonetti .
Journal of Management & Governance, 2012, 16 (3) :477-509
[40]   Does compliance with Green Bond Principles bring any benefit to make G20's 'Green economy plan' a reality? [J].
Nanayakkara, Kariyawasam Galoluwage Madurika ;
Colombage, Sisira .
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2021, 61 (03) :4257-4285