Blood pressure per the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines and heart failure risk: the Suita Study

被引:5
|
作者
Arafa, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Kokubo, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Teramoto, Masayuki [1 ,3 ]
Kashima, Rena [1 ,4 ]
Shimamoto, Keiko [1 ]
Nakao, Yoko M. M. [5 ]
Matsuo, Miki [6 ]
Yoshihara, Fumiki [6 ]
Izumi, Chisato [7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Prevent Cardiol, Suita, Japan
[2] Beni Suef Univ, Fac Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Bani Suwayf, Egypt
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Cardiovasc Pathophysiol & Therapeut, Suita, Japan
[5] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Cardiovasc & Metab Med, Leeds, England
[6] Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Hypertens & Nephrol, Suita, Japan
[7] Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Heart Failure, Suita, Japan
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
Blood pressure; Hypertension; Heart failure; Prospective cohort; Japan; HYPERTENSION; PROGRESSION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1038/s41440-022-01128-3
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Hypertension is a significant risk factor for heart failure (HF). Since hypertension definition varies across guidelines, identifying blood pressure (BP) categories that should be targeted to prevent HF is required. We, therefore, investigated the association between hypertension per the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) guidelines and HF risk. This prospective cohort study included randomly selected 2809 urban Japanese people from the Suita Study. Cox regression was used to assess HF risk, in the form of hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), for different BP categories in both guidelines, compared to a reference category defined as systolic BP (SBP) < 120 mmHg and diastolic BP (DBP) < 80 mmHg. Within 8 years of median follow-up, 339 HF cases were detected. Per the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines, hypertension I and II and isolated systolic hypertension were associated with increased HF risk: HRs (95% CIs) = 1.81 (1.33-2.47), 1.68 (1.24-2.27), and 1.64 (1.13-2.39), respectively. Per the 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines, high-normal BP, hypertension I, II, and III, and isolated systolic hypertension were associated with increased HF risk: HRs (95% CIs) = 1.88 (1.35-2.62), 1.57 (1.13-2.16), 2.10 (1.34-3.29), 2.57 (1.15-5.77), and 1.51 (1.04-2.19), respectively. In conclusion, hypertension and isolated systolic hypertension per the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines and high-normal BP per the 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines are risk factors for HF.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 582
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hypertension Identification and Management in the USA: Adherence of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guidelines
    Heaton, Joseph
    Alshami, Abbas
    Udongwo, Ndausung
    Dandu, Sowmya
    Mararenko, Anton
    Imburgio, Steven
    Akhlaq, Hira
    Johal, Anmol
    Almendral, Jesus
    Sealove, Brett
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [22] Corrections needed to 2016 ESC and AHA guidelines on heart failure (vol 5, pg 325, 2017)
    Ryden, L.
    Van de Werf, F.
    Armstrong, P. W.
    LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 5 (06): : E4 - E4
  • [23] Blood Pressure Targets Achievement According to 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines in Three European Excellence Centers for Hypertension
    Tocci, Giuliano
    Presta, Vivianne
    Ferri, Claudio
    Redon, Josep
    Volpe, Massimo
    HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE & CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION, 2020, 27 (01) : 51 - 59
  • [24] Blood Pressure Targets Achievement According to 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines in Three European Excellence Centers for Hypertension
    Giuliano Tocci
    Vivianne Presta
    Claudio Ferri
    Josep Redon
    Massimo Volpe
    High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention, 2020, 27 : 51 - 59
  • [25] Implications of the ACC/AHA risk score for prediction of heart failure: the Rotterdam Study
    Banafsheh Arshi
    Jan C. van den Berge
    Bart van Dijk
    Jaap W. Deckers
    M. Arfan Ikram
    Maryam Kavousi
    BMC Medicine, 19
  • [26] The potential for overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis because of bloodpressure variability: a comparison of the 2017 ACC/AHA, 2018 ESC/ESHand 2019 NICE hypertension guidelines
    Bell, Katy
    Doust, Jenny
    McGeechan, Kevin
    Horvath, Andrea Rita
    Barratt, Alexandra
    Hayen, Andrew
    Semsarian, Christopher
    Irwig, Les
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2021, 39 (02) : 236 - 242
  • [27] Implications of the ACC/AHA risk score for prediction of heart failure: the Rotterdam Study
    Arshi, Banafsheh
    van den Berge, Jan C.
    van Dijk, Bart
    Deckers, Jaap W.
    Ikram, M. Arfan
    Kavousi, Maryam
    BMC MEDICINE, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [28] Letter regarding the article 'Head-to-head comparison between recommendations by the ESC and ACC/AHA/HFSA heart failure guidelines'
    Amini, Laiba
    Kazmi, Samia
    Patel, Muhammad Junaid
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2024, 26 (02) : 526 - 526
  • [29] Incorporation of Retinal Arteriolosclerosis into Risk Stratification of Blood Pressure Category According to the 2017 ACC/AHA Blood Pressure Guideline
    Matsuoka, Satoshi
    Kaneko, Hidehiro
    Kamon, Tatsuya
    Suzuki, Yuta
    Yano, Yuichiro
    Okada, Akira
    Itoh, Hidetaka
    Morita, Kojiro
    Fukui, Akira
    Fujiu, Katsuhito
    Michihata, Nobuaki
    Jo, Taisuke
    Takeda, Norifumi
    Morita, Hiroyuki
    Nakamura, Sunao
    Yokoo, Takashi
    Nishiyama, Akira
    Node, Koichi
    Yasunaga, Hideo
    Komuro, Issei
    JOURNAL OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS, 2022, 29 (10) : 1487 - 1498
  • [30] Strict target blood pressure management for reducing the stroke risk according to 2017 ACC/AHA blood pressure guideline
    Zhao, Peng
    Liu, Jie
    Wang, Conglin
    Zhao, Wei
    Zhang, Yanqiu
    Gu, Hongfei
    Tu, Jun
    Wang, Jinghua
    Ning, Xianjia
    AGING-US, 2019, 11 (16): : 6522 - 6534