Blood pressure per the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines and heart failure risk: the Suita Study

被引:5
|
作者
Arafa, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Kokubo, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Teramoto, Masayuki [1 ,3 ]
Kashima, Rena [1 ,4 ]
Shimamoto, Keiko [1 ]
Nakao, Yoko M. M. [5 ]
Matsuo, Miki [6 ]
Yoshihara, Fumiki [6 ]
Izumi, Chisato [7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Prevent Cardiol, Suita, Japan
[2] Beni Suef Univ, Fac Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Bani Suwayf, Egypt
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Cardiovasc Pathophysiol & Therapeut, Suita, Japan
[5] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Cardiovasc & Metab Med, Leeds, England
[6] Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Hypertens & Nephrol, Suita, Japan
[7] Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Heart Failure, Suita, Japan
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
Blood pressure; Hypertension; Heart failure; Prospective cohort; Japan; HYPERTENSION; PROGRESSION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1038/s41440-022-01128-3
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Hypertension is a significant risk factor for heart failure (HF). Since hypertension definition varies across guidelines, identifying blood pressure (BP) categories that should be targeted to prevent HF is required. We, therefore, investigated the association between hypertension per the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) guidelines and HF risk. This prospective cohort study included randomly selected 2809 urban Japanese people from the Suita Study. Cox regression was used to assess HF risk, in the form of hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), for different BP categories in both guidelines, compared to a reference category defined as systolic BP (SBP) < 120 mmHg and diastolic BP (DBP) < 80 mmHg. Within 8 years of median follow-up, 339 HF cases were detected. Per the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines, hypertension I and II and isolated systolic hypertension were associated with increased HF risk: HRs (95% CIs) = 1.81 (1.33-2.47), 1.68 (1.24-2.27), and 1.64 (1.13-2.39), respectively. Per the 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines, high-normal BP, hypertension I, II, and III, and isolated systolic hypertension were associated with increased HF risk: HRs (95% CIs) = 1.88 (1.35-2.62), 1.57 (1.13-2.16), 2.10 (1.34-3.29), 2.57 (1.15-5.77), and 1.51 (1.04-2.19), respectively. In conclusion, hypertension and isolated systolic hypertension per the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines and high-normal BP per the 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines are risk factors for HF.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 582
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Blood pressure per the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines and heart failure risk: the Suita Study
    Ahmed Arafa
    Yoshihiro Kokubo
    Masayuki Teramoto
    Rena Kashima
    Keiko Shimamoto
    Yoko M. Nakao
    Miki Matsuo
    Fumiki Yoshihara
    Chisato Izumi
    Hypertension Research, 2023, 46 : 575 - 582
  • [2] THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BLOOD PRESSURE PER THE 2019 JS']JSH AND 2017 ACC/AHA GUIDELINES AND HEART FAILURE RISK: THE SUITA STUDY
    Arafa, Ahmed
    Kokubo, Yoshihiro
    Teramoto, Masayuki
    Kashima, Rena
    Shimamoto, Keiko
    Nakao, Yoko
    Matsuo, Miki
    Yoshihara, Fumiki
    Izumi, Chisato
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2023, 41 : E32 - E32
  • [3] Quality of systematic reviews supporting the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of hypertension
    Kanukula, Raju
    Dhurjati, Rupasvi
    Vidyasagar, Kota
    Rehana, Nusrath
    Talari, Arun
    Salam, Abdul
    Rodgers, Anthony
    Page, Matthew J.
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2022, 27 (02) : 79 - 86
  • [4] A "20/20" Match: ACC/AHA 2017 versus ESC/ESH 2018 Guidelines for Management of Hypertension
    Pradhan, Akshyaya
    Vohra, Shweta
    Sethi, Rishi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANGIOLOGY, 2021, 30 (04) : 243 - 248
  • [5] Contrasting the impact of the European (ESC/ESH 2018) versus American (ACC/AHA 2017) high blood pressure clinical practice guidelines in Poland
    Wyszomirski, A.
    Pencina, M. J.
    Whelton, P. K.
    Wojtyniak, B.
    Gaciong, Z.
    Bandosz, P.
    Zieleniewicz, P.
    Zdrojewski, T.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 3967 - 3967
  • [6] Population impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines compared with the 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for hypertension management
    Vaucher, Julien
    Marques-Vidal, Pedro
    Waeber, Gerard
    Vollenweider, Peter
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (10) : 1111 - 1113
  • [7] Impact of 2018 ESC/ESH and 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines: Difference in Prevalence of White-Coat and Masked Hypertension
    Kim, Byong-Kyu
    Rhee, Moo-Yong
    HEALTHCARE, 2020, 8 (02)
  • [8] ACC/AHA Versus ESC Guidelines on Heart Failure JACC Guideline Comparison
    van der Meer, Peter
    Gaggin, Hanna K.
    Dec, G. William
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (21) : 2757 - 2768
  • [9] ACC/AHA/HFSA 2022 and ESC 2021 guidelines on heart failure comparison
    Behnoush, Amir Hossein
    Khalaji, Amirmohammad
    Naderi, Nasim
    Ashraf, Haleh
    von Haehling, Stephan
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2023, 10 (03): : 1531 - 1544
  • [10] Similarities and Differences Between the ACC/AHA and ESH/ESC Guidelines for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults A Perspective
    Bakris, George
    CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2019, 124 (07) : 969 - 971