Government regulation, horizontal coopetition, and low-carbon technology innovation: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis of government and homogeneous energy enterprises

被引:24
作者
Zhou, Wenwen [1 ]
Shi, Yu [1 ]
Zhao, Tian [2 ]
Cao, Ximeng [1 ]
Li, Jialin [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon neutrality; Government regulation; Horizontal coopetition; Energy enterprises; Low-carbon technology innovation; Tripartite evolutionary game; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; CO-OPETITION; GREEN; COMPETITION; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113844
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Low-carbon technology innovation (LCTI) is key to achieving energy conservation and emission reduction. As the main body of carbon emissions, accelerating the promotion of energy enterprises' LCTI is urgently needed. Based on the importance of horizontal coopetition and government regulation for enterprises' LCTI, this paper establishes a tripartite evolutionary game model of local government and two homogeneous energy enterprises to clarify their dynamic behavior strategies. Furthermore, through numerical simulation, a sensitivity analysis of the effect of the main parameter changes on all parties' evolution is carried out. Moreover, we obtained the accurate optimal value of S&P (subsidies and penalties) by using a combination of random jumping and L-BFGS-B method. The findings indicate that (i) increasing the initial willingness of government and enterprises can facilitate faster system evolution towards optimal state. Early governmental intervention can be beneficial in preventing negative behavior of enterprises. (ii) There exists optimal range, and even optimal level, for government S&P, with penalties being more effective than subsidies in promoting LCTI. (iii)Low coopetition is ineffective while the intensity of coopetitive relationship is positively correlated with its' effect. (iiii) Small-scale enterprises are more sensitive to changes in S&P measures and coopetition relationships.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Ahuja G, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P317, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317::AID-SMJ90>3.3.CO
[2]  
2-2
[3]   The impacts of government R&D subsidies on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms [J].
Bai, Yu ;
Song, Siyi ;
Jiao, Jianling ;
Yang, Ranran .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 (819-829) :819-829
[4]   Coopetition in corporate venture capital: the relationship between network attributes, corporate innovativeness, and financial performance [J].
Baierl, Ronny ;
Anokhin, Sergey ;
Grichnik, Dietmar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2016, 71 (1-2) :58-80
[5]   Decentralization and Veiled Corruption under China's "Rule of Mandates" [J].
Birney, Mayling .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 53 :55-67
[6]  
Bouckaert S., 2021, Net zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector
[7]   Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions [J].
Bouncken, Ricarda B. ;
Gast, Johanna ;
Kraus, Sascha ;
Bogers, Marcel .
REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 9 (03) :577-601
[8]  
Brandenburger A., 1998, COOPETITION
[9]   Plastic-Pollution Reduction and Bio-Resources Preservation Using Green-Packaging Game Coopetition [J].
Carfi, David ;
Donato, Alessia .
MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (23)
[10]   A coopetitive model for the green economy [J].
Carfi, David ;
Schiliro, Daniele .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2012, 29 (04) :1215-1219