The influence of landscape features on the population connectivity and genetic structure of the Edible Dormouse Glis glis in Poland

被引:0
作者
Moska, Magdalena [1 ]
Mucha, Anna [1 ]
Wierzbicki, Heliodor [1 ]
Nowak, Blazej [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Environm & Life Sci, Dept Genet, Kozuchowska 7, PL-51631 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
deforestation; Edible Dormouse; genetic structure; Glis glis; habitat fragmentation; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; R-PACKAGE; MAMMALS; DIFFERENTIATION; FITNESS; MARKERS;
D O I
10.1093/jmammal/gyad078
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
In this study, we analyze and compare the genetic structure of edible dormice representing five populations, inhabiting forest complexes in southwestern Poland that differ in their degree of fragmentation and isolation. Total genomic DNA was isolated from hairs with bulbs of 145 individuals captured between 2018 and 2020. All dormice sampled were genotyped at 14 microsatellite loci. Population genetic analyses showed that genetic variability in the studied dormice, assessed based on observed and expected heterozygosity as well as allelic richness, was on average very low (0.39, 0.43, and 2.83, respectively). In the populations studied, genetic structure was detected indicating two or five distinct genetic clusters, the existence of which can be attributed to either historical factors or modern human activity. Genetic differentiation between dormice living in the studied localities, determined by F-ST, ranged from 0.07 to 0.40 (all F-ST coefficients were significant at P < 0.05). A significant positive correlation was detected between genetic differentiation and geographic distance (r = 0.645, P < 0.017), indicating that genetic differentiation increases with distance, but no correlation between genetic differentiation and habitat barriers (r = 0.359, P < 0.132). The results of this research are compared to those of other European populations of edible dormice, and implications for the future of this endangered species are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1390 / 1399
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[11]   Determinants of differential extinction vulnerabilities of small mammals in Atlantic forest fragments in Brazil [J].
de Castro, EBV ;
Fernandez, FAS .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 119 (01) :73-80
[12]   The ade4 package: Implementing the duality diagram for ecologists [J].
Dray, Stephane ;
Dufour, Anne-Beatrice .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (04) :1-20
[13]   STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method [J].
Earl, Dent A. ;
vonHoldt, Bridgett M. .
CONSERVATION GENETICS RESOURCES, 2012, 4 (02) :359-361
[14]   Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study [J].
Evanno, G ;
Regnaut, S ;
Goudet, J .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2005, 14 (08) :2611-2620
[15]   Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles [J].
Falush, Daniel ;
Stephens, Matthew ;
Pritchard, Jonathan K. .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY NOTES, 2007, 7 (04) :574-578
[16]   Genetic Consequences of Forest Fragmentation for a Highly Specialized Arboreal Mammal - the Edible Dormouse [J].
Fietz, Joanna ;
Tomiuk, Jurgen ;
Loeschcke, Volker ;
Weis-Dootz, Tanja ;
Segelbacher, Gernot .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02)
[17]   Genetics and extinction [J].
Frankham, R .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2005, 126 (02) :131-140
[18]  
Frankham R., 2002, Introduction to Conservation Genetics
[19]  
Goudet J., 2022, HIERFSTAT ESTIMATION
[20]   Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth's ecosystems [J].
Haddad, Nick M. ;
Brudvig, Lars A. ;
Clobert, Jean ;
Davies, Kendi F. ;
Gonzalez, Andrew ;
Holt, Robert D. ;
Lovejoy, Thomas E. ;
Sexton, Joseph O. ;
Austin, Mike P. ;
Collins, Cathy D. ;
Cook, William M. ;
Damschen, Ellen I. ;
Ewers, Robert M. ;
Foster, Bryan L. ;
Jenkins, Clinton N. ;
King, Andrew J. ;
Laurance, William F. ;
Levey, Douglas J. ;
Margules, Chris R. ;
Melbourne, Brett A. ;
Nicholls, A. O. ;
Orrock, John L. ;
Song, Dan-Xia ;
Townshend, John R. .
SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2015, 1 (02)