Prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of digital rectal examination and magnetic resonance imaging for T staging of prostate cancer

被引:1
作者
Zhu, Junming [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xiaohui [1 ,2 ]
Xue, Yuting [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Qingshui [1 ,2 ]
Xue, Xueyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang, Zhiyang [4 ,7 ]
Chen, Shaohao [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Urol Res Inst, Dept Urol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Natl Reg Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Binhai Campus, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Fujian Key Lab Precis Med Canc, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Med Univ, Hosp Quanzhou 1, Dept Urol Surg, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Urol Res Inst, Dept Urol, Fuzhou 350005, Peoples R China
[6] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Natl Reg Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Fuzhou 350212, Binhai Campus, Peoples R China
[7] Fujian Med Univ, Quanzhou First Hosp, Dept Urol, Quanzhou 362 000, Peoples R China
关键词
Diagnostic accuracy; Digital rectal examination; MRI; Prostate cancer; T staging; POPULATION; DENSITY; DISEASE; CARE; MRI;
D O I
10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_176_23
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate staging of prostate cancer (PCa) is the basis for the risk stratification to select targeted treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy rates of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital rectal examination (DRE) for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable PCa. Methods: From March 2021 to March 2022, patients with PCa with T staging by prostate biopsy were included. All examinations used postoperative histopathologic T staging as the reference standard. All patients underwent DRE and MRI before the puncture. Two blinded urologists and radiologists independently evaluated DRE and MRI, respectively. Before the examination, patients were then divided into early- (T1, T2) and late-(T3, T4) stage cancer. Analysis of a paired sample sign test was performed to determine differences between DRE and MRI. Results: A total of 136 study participants with PCa were evaluated histopathologically, of whom 71% (97/136) and 29% (39/136) were at the early- and late-stage cancer, respectively. MRI had a significantly higher accuracy (91.9% vs. 76.5%, P < 0.001) compared with DRE. Further, MRI showed a higher sensitivity than DRE to diagnose early PCa (92.8% vs. 74.2%; P < 0.001). However, the specificity was not significantly different between them (89.7% vs. 82.1%; P = 0.375). Area under the curve (receiver operating curve) values were calculated as 0.78 +/- 0.038 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.86), 0.91 +/- 0.028 (95% CI, 0.86-0.97), and 0.872 +/- 0.028 (95% CI, 0.80-0.92) for DRE-, MRI-, MRI + DRE-based PCa predictions, respectively. The prediction performance of MRI was better than that of DRE (DeLong test, z = 3.632, P = 0.0003) and MRI + DRE (DeLong test, z = 3.715, P = 0.0002). Conclusion: For resectable PCa, the diagnostic potential of MRI in assessing the T stage was higher than that of DRE. However, DRE is still valuable, especially for patients with locally advanced PCa.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1030
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Localising occult prostate cancer metastasis with advanced imaging techniques (LOCATE trial): a prospective cohort, observational diagnostic accuracy trial investigating whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in radio-recurrent prostate cancer
    Adeleke, Sola
    Latifoltojar, Arash
    Sidhu, Harbir
    Galazi, Myria
    Shah, Taimur T.
    Clemente, Joey
    Davda, Reena
    Payne, Heather Ann
    Chouhan, Manil D.
    Lioumi, Maria
    Chua, Sue
    Freeman, Alex
    Rodriguez-Justo, Manuel
    Coolen, Anthony
    Vadgama, Sachin
    Morris, Steve
    Cook, Gary J.
    Bomanji, Jamshed
    Arya, Manit
    Chowdhury, Simon
    Wan, Simon
    Haroon, Athar
    Ng, Tony
    Ahmed, Hashim Uddin
    Punwani, Shonit
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [42] Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with pathological staging
    Faletti, Riccardo
    Gatti, Marco
    Arezzo, Alberto
    Stola, Silvia
    Benedini, Maria C.
    Bergamasco, Laura
    Morino, Mario
    Fonio, Paolo
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2018, 73 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [43] Magnetic resonance imaging improves the prediction of tumor staging in localized prostate cancer
    Valentin, B.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    Ullrich, T.
    Klingebiel, M.
    Demetrescu, D.
    Sawicki, L. M.
    Lakes, J.
    Mally, D.
    Quentin, M.
    Esposito, I
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Arsov, C.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (06) : 2751 - 2759
  • [44] The diagnostic test accuracy of rectal examination for prostate cancer diagnosis in symptomatic patients: a systematic review
    Jones, Daniel
    Friend, Charlotte
    Dreher, Andreas
    Allgar, Victoria
    Macleod, Una
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 19
  • [45] The diagnostic test accuracy of rectal examination for prostate cancer diagnosis in symptomatic patients: a systematic review
    Daniel Jones
    Charlotte Friend
    Andreas Dreher
    Victoria Allgar
    Una Macleod
    BMC Family Practice, 19
  • [46] Diagnostic accuracy of different computer-aided diagnostic systems for prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging A systematic review with diagnostic meta-analysis
    Xing, Xiping
    Zhao, Xinke
    Wei, Huiping
    Li, Yingdong
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (03) : E23817
  • [47] Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis
    Engelbrecht, MR
    Jager, GJ
    Laheij, RJ
    Verbeek, ALM
    van Lier, HJ
    Barentsz, JO
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (09) : 2294 - 2302
  • [48] Value of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3T for the Local Staging of Prostate Cancer
    Otto, J.
    Thoermer, G.
    Seiwerts, M.
    Fuchs, J.
    Garnov, N.
    Franz, T.
    Horn, L. -C.
    Do, M. H.
    Stolzenburg, J. -U.
    Kahn, T.
    Moche, M.
    Busse, H.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2014, 186 (08): : 795 - 802
  • [49] A prospective comparative analysis of the accuracy of HistoScanning and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the localization of prostate cancer among men undergoing radical prostatectomy
    Orczyk, Clement
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Babb, James
    Wysock, James
    Kheterpal, Emil
    Huang, William C.
    Stifelman, Michael
    Lepor, Herbert
    Taneja, Samir S.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (01) : 3.e1 - 3.e8
  • [50] Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer
    Huzjan, R
    Sala, E
    Hricak, H
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2005, 2 (09): : 434 - 442