Prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of digital rectal examination and magnetic resonance imaging for T staging of prostate cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Zhu, Junming [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xiaohui [1 ,2 ]
Xue, Yuting [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Qingshui [1 ,2 ]
Xue, Xueyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang, Zhiyang [4 ,7 ]
Chen, Shaohao [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Urol Res Inst, Dept Urol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Natl Reg Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Binhai Campus, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Fujian Key Lab Precis Med Canc, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Med Univ, Hosp Quanzhou 1, Dept Urol Surg, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Urol Res Inst, Dept Urol, Fuzhou 350005, Peoples R China
[6] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Natl Reg Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Fuzhou 350212, Binhai Campus, Peoples R China
[7] Fujian Med Univ, Quanzhou First Hosp, Dept Urol, Quanzhou 362 000, Peoples R China
关键词
Diagnostic accuracy; Digital rectal examination; MRI; Prostate cancer; T staging; POPULATION; DENSITY; DISEASE; CARE; MRI;
D O I
10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_176_23
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate staging of prostate cancer (PCa) is the basis for the risk stratification to select targeted treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy rates of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital rectal examination (DRE) for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable PCa. Methods: From March 2021 to March 2022, patients with PCa with T staging by prostate biopsy were included. All examinations used postoperative histopathologic T staging as the reference standard. All patients underwent DRE and MRI before the puncture. Two blinded urologists and radiologists independently evaluated DRE and MRI, respectively. Before the examination, patients were then divided into early- (T1, T2) and late-(T3, T4) stage cancer. Analysis of a paired sample sign test was performed to determine differences between DRE and MRI. Results: A total of 136 study participants with PCa were evaluated histopathologically, of whom 71% (97/136) and 29% (39/136) were at the early- and late-stage cancer, respectively. MRI had a significantly higher accuracy (91.9% vs. 76.5%, P < 0.001) compared with DRE. Further, MRI showed a higher sensitivity than DRE to diagnose early PCa (92.8% vs. 74.2%; P < 0.001). However, the specificity was not significantly different between them (89.7% vs. 82.1%; P = 0.375). Area under the curve (receiver operating curve) values were calculated as 0.78 +/- 0.038 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.86), 0.91 +/- 0.028 (95% CI, 0.86-0.97), and 0.872 +/- 0.028 (95% CI, 0.80-0.92) for DRE-, MRI-, MRI + DRE-based PCa predictions, respectively. The prediction performance of MRI was better than that of DRE (DeLong test, z = 3.632, P = 0.0003) and MRI + DRE (DeLong test, z = 3.715, P = 0.0002). Conclusion: For resectable PCa, the diagnostic potential of MRI in assessing the T stage was higher than that of DRE. However, DRE is still valuable, especially for patients with locally advanced PCa.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1030
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy of 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Staging of Prostate Cancer in Comparison to the Partin Tables
    Augustin, H.
    Fritz, G. A.
    Ehammer, T.
    Auprich, M.
    Pummer, K.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2009, 50 (05) : 562 - 569
  • [22] The effect of anti-spasmodic administration on the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging staging of rectal cancer
    Taylor, Anna
    Wilkins, Simon
    Gelber, Nicholas
    Wang, Wei Chun
    Oliva, Karen
    Yap, Raymond
    McMurrick, Paul
    Ranchod, Pravin
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 93 (06) : 1613 - 1619
  • [23] Diagnostic value of the abnormal digital rectal examination in the modern MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway
    Sajjad, Wasiq
    Thankappannair, Vineetha
    Shah, Syed
    Ahmed, Adham
    Saeb-Parsy, Kasra
    Kastner, Christof
    Lamb, Benjamin
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2024, 17 (04) : 412 - 418
  • [24] Accuracy of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Staging Rectal Cancer Patients Proceeding Directly to Surgery
    Milanzi, Elasma
    Pelly, Rachel M.
    Hayes, Ian P.
    Gibbs, Peter
    Faragher, Ian
    Reece, Jeanette C.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, : 1674 - 1682
  • [25] Is magnetic resonance imaging necessary in the staging of prostate cancer?
    Tüzel, E
    Sevinç, M
    Obuz, F
    Sade, M
    Kirkali, Z
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1998, 61 (04) : 227 - 231
  • [26] The Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Endorectal Ultrasound for the Accurate Preoperative T-staging of Rectal Cancer
    Opara, Collins O.
    Khan, Farhana Yaqoob
    Kabiraj, Dr Gargi
    Kauser, Humaira
    Palakeel, Jaimee J.
    Ali, Mazin
    Chaduvula, Phani
    Chhabra, Sanika
    Lamichhane, Smriti Lamsal
    Ramesh, Vaiishnavi
    Mohammed, Lubna
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [27] Dichotomous Estimation of Prostate Volume: A Diagnostic Study of the Accuracy of the Digital Rectal Examination
    Su, Michael Z.
    Lenaghan, Daniel
    Woo, Henry H.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2013, 31 (03) : 220 - 225
  • [28] Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging staging of prostate cancer
    Chandra, Ronil V.
    Heinze, Stefan
    Dowling, Richard
    Shadbolt, Clair
    Costello, Anthony
    Pedersen, John
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 77 (10) : 860 - 865
  • [29] The Role of Digital Rectal Examination Prostate Volume Category in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Its Correlation with the Magnetic Resonance Prostate Volume
    Morote, Juan
    Picola, Natalia
    Munoz-Rodriguez, Jesus
    Paesano, Nahuel
    Ruiz-Plazas, Xavier
    Munoz-Rivero, Marta v.
    Celma, Ana
    Garcia-de Manuel, Gemma
    Miro, Berta
    Abascal, Jose M.
    Servian, Pol
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2024, 42 (02) : 441 - 448
  • [30] The role of 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in staging prostate cancer
    Johnston, Richard
    Wong, Lih-Ming
    Warren, Anne
    Shah, Nimish
    Neal, David
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 83 (04) : 234 - 238