Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Using the KangDuo Surgical Robot System vs the da Vinci Si Robotic System

被引:31
作者
Fan, Shubo [1 ]
Hao, Han [1 ]
Chen, Silu [1 ]
Wang, Jie [1 ]
Dai, Xiaofei [2 ]
Zhang, Meng [1 ]
Chen, Xu [1 ]
Li, Zhihua [1 ]
Xiong, Shengwei [1 ]
Han, Guanpeng [1 ]
Zhu, Jun [1 ]
Zhang, Zhongyuan [1 ]
Yu, Wei [1 ]
Cui, Liang [2 ]
Shen, Cheng [1 ,3 ]
Zhou, Liqun [1 ,3 ]
Li, Xuesong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Peking Univ First Hosp, Inst Urol, Natl Urol Canc Ctr,Dept Urol,Beijing Key Lab Uroge, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Civil Aviat Gen Hosp, Civil Aviat Med Coll, Dept Urol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Peking Univ First Hosp, Inst Urol, Natl Urol Canc Ctr,Dept Urol,Beijing Key Lab Uroge, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; robotic surgical procedures; robotics; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1089/end.2022.0739
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed using the KangDuo surgical robot system to the da Vinci Si robotic system in clinically localized prostate cancer (KD-RARP vs DV-RARP).Methods: A total of 16 patients underwent extraperitoneal KD-RARP performed by a single experienced surgeon using the KangDuo surgical robot system between May 2021 and August 2021. The data were prospectively collected. The most recent 16 cases of extraperitoneal DV-RARP performed in 2021 by the same surgeon were selected from a prospectively maintained database for comparison to prevent operator variability. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected and compared between the two groups.Results: No significant difference was noted between the two groups in terms of basic clinical characteristics. All operations were performed successfully without open or traditional laparoscopic conversion. KD-RARP had a significantly longer operation time compared with DV-RARP (127 [107-159] vs 70.5 [54-90] minutes, p < 0.001). No significant differences between the two groups were observed in neurovascular bundle sparing, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay duration, complications, positive surgical margins, biochemical recurrence, and continence recovery 3 months after catheter removal.Conclusions: RARP using the KangDuo surgical robot system achieved similar short-term oncological and functional outcomes with a disadvantage in operation time compared with the da Vinci Si robotic system. A multicenter randomized clinical trial with a larger sample size is needed for more experience.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 574
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, J UROLOGY
[2]   Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Binder, J ;
Kramer, W .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 87 (04) :408-410
[3]   Cost Comparison of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer [J].
Bolenz, Christian ;
Gupta, Amit ;
Hotze, Timothy ;
Ho, Richard ;
Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. ;
Roehrborn, Claus G. ;
Lotan, Yair .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (03) :453-458
[4]   Robot-assisted, Single-site, Dismembered Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction with the New da Vinci Platform: A Stage 2a Study [J].
Buffi, Nicolo Maria ;
Lughezzani, Giovanni ;
Fossati, Nicola ;
Lazzeri, Massimo ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Lista, Giuliana ;
Larcher, Alessandro ;
Abrate, Alberto ;
Fiori, Cristian ;
Cestari, Andrea ;
Porpiglia, Francesco .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (01) :151-156
[5]   Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system: surgical technique and results of the first human trial [J].
Chang, Ki Don ;
Raheem, Ali Abdel ;
Choi, Young Deuk ;
Chung, Byung Ha ;
Rha, Koon Ho .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (03) :441-448
[6]   The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience [J].
Clavien, Pierre A. ;
Barkun, Jeffrey ;
de Oliveira, Michelle L. ;
Vauthey, Jean Nicolas ;
Dindo, Daniel ;
Schulick, Richard D. ;
de Santibanes, Eduardo ;
Pekolj, Juan ;
Slankamenac, Ksenija ;
Bassi, Claudio ;
Graf, Rolf ;
Vonlanthen, Rene ;
Padbury, Robert ;
Cameron, John L. ;
Makuuchi, Masatoshi .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (02) :187-196
[7]   Comparison of KD-SR-01 robotic partial nephrectomy and 3D-laparoscopic partial nephrectomy from an operative and ergonomic perspective: A prospective randomized controlled study in porcine models [J].
Dai, Xiaofei ;
Fan, Shubo ;
Hao, Han ;
Yang, Kunlin ;
Shen, Cheng ;
Xiong, Gengyan ;
Li, Xueying ;
Cui, Liang ;
Li, Xuesong ;
Zhou, Liqun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (02)
[8]   Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Robotic Prostatectomy Past, Present, and Future [J].
Davis, Meghan ;
Egan, Jillian ;
Marhamati, Shawn ;
Galfano, Antonio ;
Kowalczyk, Keith J. .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021, 48 (01) :11-23
[9]   Oncologic Outcomes at 10 Years Following Robotic Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Diaz, Mireya ;
Peabody, James O. ;
Kapoor, Victor ;
Sammon, Jesse ;
Rogers, Craig G. ;
Stricker, Hans ;
Lane, Zhaoli ;
Gupta, Nilesh ;
Bhandari, Mahendra ;
Menon, Mani .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (06) :1168-1176
[10]   Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis [J].
Erdogru, T ;
Teber, D ;
Frede, T ;
Marrero, R ;
Hammady, A ;
Seemann, O ;
Rassweiler, J .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 46 (03) :312-319