共 81 条
Efficacy of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program on 0-12 year-old Quebec children?s behavior
被引:5
作者:
Gagne, Marie-Helene
[1
]
Piche, Genevieve
[2
]
Brunson, Liesette
[3
]
Clement, Marie-Eve
[2
]
Drapeau, Sylvie
[1
]
Jean, Sarah-Maude
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Laval, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Quebec Outaouais, Gatineau, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Quebec Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词:
Child?s behavior;
Parenting;
Triple P;
Program evaluation;
Evidence -based program;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL;
PUBLIC-HEALTH APPROACH;
DIFFICULTIES QUESTIONNAIRE;
DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR;
PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN;
FOLLOW-UP;
DEPRESSION;
STYLES;
DISSEMINATION;
METAANALYSIS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106946
中图分类号:
D669 [社会生活与社会问题];
C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号:
1204 ;
摘要:
This study evaluates the impact of the Triple P parenting support program (Primary Care and Group) on 0-12 year-old Quebec children's behavior. A quasi-experimental pretest - post-test design with an active care-as-usual comparison group was used examine program effects. A sample of 384 parents divided into two groups (n Triple P = 291; n comparison = 93) responded to four subscales of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, and prosocial behaviors. The dose of inter-vention received by each parent in terms of number of sessions was considered in the analyses. Results indicated that parents in the Triple P group reported larger improvements than parents in the comparison group with respect to conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, and prosocial behavior. Both groups reported similar moderate improvements on emotional symptoms. Intervention dose did not contribute to explaining these dif-ferences, beyond the nature of the intervention (Triple P vs care as usual). A follow-up of parents in the Triple P group two to four years after the end of the program (n follow-up = 164) suggested that the effects of Triple P are maintained over time. These results help to broaden the evidence base on the efficacy of this program in a so-ciocultural and linguistic context different from that in which it was developed.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文