Geometrical interpretation of Data Reconciliation and uncertainty reduction in Multi-Sensor systems

被引:2
作者
Gurevich, Yuri [1 ]
Gurevich, Alexander [2 ]
Gurevich, Hanna [3 ]
机构
[1] Res Flows Inc, 17 Jill Crescent, Brampton, ON L6S 3H9, Canada
[2] Humber Coll, Dept Math Res Skills & Anal, 205 Humber Coll Blvd, Etobicoke, ON M9W5L7, Canada
[3] GERA Labs, 79 Pepperberry Rd, Thornhill, ON L4J 8X4, Canada
关键词
Data Validation Reconciliation; Uncertainty Reduction; Multi -Sensor Systems; Multivariate Analysis; System Performance Optimization; PROCESS FLOW; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112715
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A data reconciliation and uncertainty reduction process, for multi-sensor systems such as power production plants, chemical processing plants, and many others, is considered. Methods of correcting original measurements to reduce their uncertainty, and to obtain more reliable information about the system, known as Data Validation and Reconciliation (DVR) or Process Data Reconciliation (PDR), have been developed in recent decades. These methods are present in literature as discussions on computer codes, statistical criteria, and details of specific industrial applications and implementations. This paper provides a mathematically accurate and intuitively understandable discussion on the scientific basis, benefits, limitations, and properties of the DVR/PDR tech-nology. This is achieved through geometrical interpretation of this technology in a multidimensional metric space with metric tensor defined by the set of the original measurements. The effect of various factors on the methods' output, are analyzed using graphical illustrations and analytical calculations.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Alvin C.R., 2002, Methods of Multivariate Analysis, V2nd
[2]   Data validation and reconciliation for error correction and gross error detection in multiphase allocation systems [J].
Badings, Thom S. ;
van Putten, Dennis S. .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 195
[3]   ESTIMATION OF PARAMETERS IN NONLINEAR, IMPLICIT MODELS [J].
BRITT, HI ;
LUECKE, RH .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1973, 15 (02) :233-247
[4]   RECONCILIATION OF PROCESS FLOW-RATES BY MATRIX PROJECTION .1. LINEAR CASE [J].
CROWE, CM ;
CAMPOS, YAG ;
HRYMAK, A .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1983, 29 (06) :881-888
[5]  
Crytzer K., 2020, NRC PRES M FEB 13 20
[6]  
Deza M.M., ENCY DISTANCES CHAPT, P241, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-00234-214, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-00234-214]
[7]  
Dimitri P., 2008, TSITSIKLIS INTRO PRO, V2nd
[8]  
Dodson C.T.J., 1991, GRADUATE TEXTS MATH, V130, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-10514-2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-10514-2]
[9]   Computed Tomography of Chemiluminescence (CTC): Instantaneous 3D measurements and Phantom studies of a turbulent opposed jet flame [J].
Floyd, J. ;
Geipel, P. ;
Kempf, A. M. .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2011, 158 (02) :376-391
[10]  
Fossen T.I., 2009, IEEE CONTR SYST MAG