Gasification kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of fine coal using thermogravimetric analysis

被引:39
作者
Aprianti, Nabila [1 ]
Faizal, Muhammad [2 ]
Said, Muhammad [2 ]
Nasir, Subriyer [2 ]
Fudholi, Ahmad [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ PGRI Palembang, Fac Engn, Chem Engn Dept, Jl Jendral A Yani Lr Gotong Royong 9-10 Ulu, Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia
[2] Univ Sriwijaya, Fac Engn, Chem Engn Dept, Ogan Ilir 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia
[3] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Solar Energy Res Inst, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
[4] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy BRIN, Res Ctr Energy Convers & Conservat, Jakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Coal gasification; Isoconversional methods; Non-isothermal; Gasification; Reaction kinetic; Activation energy; PYROLYSIS CHARACTERISTICS; COMBUSTION; WASTE; GAS; APPROXIMATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2023.126666
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding the kinetics of fine coal gasification is needed to improve the design process and optimize the production of clean energy. To establish the kinetic and thermodynamic characteristics of fine coal gasification and the function of the catalyst in the process, thermogravimetric analysis was performed. Four iso-conversional models were used to determine the activation energy: Friedman, Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO), Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS), and Starink. The precise activation energy values are then utilized to compute the pre-exponential factor and thermodynamic parameters. For the Friedman, FWO, KAS, and Starink methods, the average activation energies were 142.14 kJ/mol, 102.49 kJ/mol, 89.09 kJ/mol, and 85.21 kJ/mol, respectively. The gasification process followed the second-order reaction based on the Coats-Redfern method, both non-catalytic and catalytic. In terms of thermodynamic properties, the entire gasification process is endothermic and acceptable, marked with positive values for Delta H and Delta G and negative values for Delta S. This kinetic and ther-modynamic analysis could be useful for guiding for optimizing the fine coal gasification process.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Application of a life cycle assessment to compare environmental performance in coal mine tailings management [J].
Adiansyah, Joni Safaat ;
Haque, Nawshad ;
Rosano, Michele ;
Biswas, Wahidul .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 199 :181-191
[2]  
Aprianti N., 2021, Journal of Applied Engineering Science, V19, P334, DOI [10.5937/jaes0-28781, DOI 10.5937/JAES0-28781]
[3]   H2-rich syngas production by sorption enhanced steam gasification of palm empty fruit bunch [J].
Aprianti, Nabila ;
Faizal, Muhammad ;
Said, Muhammad ;
Nasir, Subriyer .
COMPTES RENDUS CHIMIE, 2022, 25 :155-167
[4]   Combustion characteristics of Turkish lignites at oxygen-enriched and oxy-fuel combustion conditions [J].
Barzegar, Ramin ;
Yozgatligil, Ahmet ;
Atimtay, Aysel T. .
JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE, 2019, 92 (05) :1440-1450
[5]   System dynamics approach in determining coal utilization scenario in Indonesia [J].
Baskoro, Firly Rachmaditya ;
Takahashi, Katsuhiko ;
Morikawa, Katsumi ;
Nagasawa, Keisuke .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 73
[6]   Kinetics, thermodynamics and gas evolution of atmospheric circulating fluidized bed coal gasification fly ash combustion in air atmosphere [J].
Chen, Zhichao ;
Li, Jiawei ;
Guan, Shuo ;
Qiao, Yanyu ;
Yuan, Zhenhua ;
Zeng, Lingyan ;
Li, Zhengqi .
FUEL, 2021, 290
[7]   KINETIC PARAMETERS FROM THERMOGRAVIMETRIC DATA [J].
COATS, AW ;
REDFERN, JP .
NATURE, 1964, 201 (491) :68-&
[8]   APPLICABILITY OF THE MASTER PLOTS IN KINETIC-ANALYSIS OF NON-ISOTHERMAL DATA [J].
CRIADO, JM ;
MALEK, J ;
ORTEGA, A .
THERMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1989, 147 (02) :377-385
[9]   Thermal decomposition kinetics of sorghum straw via thermogravimetric analysis [J].
Dhyani, Vaibhav ;
Kumar, Jitendra ;
Bhaskar, Thallada .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 245 :1122-1129
[10]   Synergistic effect, kinetic and thermodynamics parameters analyses of co-gasification of municipal solid waste and bituminous coal with CO2 [J].
Ding, Guangchao ;
He, Boshu ;
Yao, Huifeng ;
Kuang, Yucheng ;
Song, Jingge ;
Su, Liangbin .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 119 :342-355