Assessing Long-Term Medical Remanufacturing Emissions with Life Cycle Analysis

被引:6
作者
Meister, Julia A. A. [1 ]
Sharp, Jack [1 ]
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Nguyen, Khuong An [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brighton, Sch Architecture Technol & Engn, Brighton BN2 4AT, England
关键词
medical remanufacturing; single-use devices; life cycle analysis; greenhouse gas emissions; carbon footprint; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/pr11010036
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The unsustainable take-make-dispose linear economy prevalent in healthcare contributes 4.4% to global Greenhouse Gas emissions. A popular but not yet widely-embraced solution is to remanufacture common single-use medical devices like electrophysiology catheters, significantly extending their lifetimes by enabling a circular life cycle. To support the adoption of catheter remanufacturing, we propose a comprehensive emission framework and carry out a holistic evaluation of virgin manufactured and remanufactured carbon emissions with Life Cycle Analysis (LCA). We followed ISO modelling standards and NHS reporting guidelines to ensure industry relevance. We conclude that remanufacturing may lead to a reduction of up to 60% per turn (-1.92 kg CO(2)eq, burden-free) and 57% per life (-1.87 kg CO(2)eq, burdened). Our extensive sensitivity analysis and industry-informed buy-back scheme simulation revealed long-term emission reductions of up to 48% per remanufactured catheter life (-1.73 kg CO(2)eq). Our comprehensive results encourage the adoption of electrophysiology catheter remanufacturing, and highlight the importance of estimating long-term emissions in addition to traditional emission metrics.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Andrae A., 2022, ENG APPL SCI LETT, V5, DOI [10.30538/psrp-easl2022.0085, DOI 10.30538/PSRP-EASL2018.0003]
  • [2] [Anonymous], UK PUBLIC GEN ACTS L
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, European Commission, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
  • [5] A review of LCA assumptions impacting whether landfilling or incineration results in less greenhouse gas emissions
    Anshassi, Malak
    Sackles, Hannah
    Townsend, Timothy G.
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 174
  • [6] Reviewing the underlying assumptions in waste LCA models to identify impacts on waste management decision making
    Anshassi, Malak
    Townsend, Timothy G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 313
  • [7] Comparing sources and analysis of uncertainty in consequential and attributional life cycle assessment: review of current practice and recommendations
    Bamber, Nicole
    Turner, Ian
    Arulnathan, Vivek
    Li, Yang
    Zargar Ershadi, Shiva
    Smart, Alyssa
    Pelletier, Nathan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (01) : 168 - 180
  • [8] Integration of future water scarcity and electricity supply into prospective LCA: Application to the assessment of water desalination for the steel industry
    Baustert, Paul
    Igos, Elorri
    Schaubroeck, Thomas
    Chion, Laurent
    Beltran, Angelica Mendoza
    Stehfest, Elke
    Vuuren, Detlef
    Biemans, Hester
    Benetto, Enrico
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2022, 26 (04) : 1182 - 1194
  • [9] Environmental performance comparison of bioplastics and petrochemical plastics: A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodological decisions
    Bishop, George
    Styles, David
    Lens, Piet N. L.
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 168
  • [10] The life cycle analysis of a dental examination: Quantifying the environmental burden of an examination in a hypothetical dental practice
    Borglin, Linnea
    Pekarski, Stephanie
    Saget, Sophie
    Duane, Brett
    [J]. COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 49 (06) : 581 - 593