Influence of the Type of Bone Cement Used in Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Chronic Periarticular Joint Infection on the Spacer Replacement and Reinfection Rate

被引:3
|
作者
Chang, Meng-Wei [1 ]
Wu, Cheng-Ta [2 ]
Yen, Shih-Hsiang [2 ]
Tan, Timothy L. [3 ]
Lin, Po-Chun [2 ]
Kuo, Feng-Chih [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Linkou Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
[5] Cheng Shiu Univ, Ctr Gen Educ, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
关键词
periprosthetic joint infection; commercial antibiotic-loaded bone cement; antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacer; spacer exchange; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; ANTIBIOTIC ELUTION; RISK-FACTORS; GENTAMICIN; VANCOMYCIN; REVISION; HIP;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12020600
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) spacers are used in the first stage when treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study aimed to investigate whether a spacer made from commercial ALBC or plain bone cement with additional antibiotics could affect the spacer exchange rate before reimplantation. Methods: Patients undergoing two-stage exchange arthroplasty due to chronic PJI from January 2014 to August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The exclusion criteria included arthroplasty in the setting of septic arthritis, megaprosthesis, atypical pathogen infection, spacer placement unrelated to PJI, and spacer exchange due to mechanical complications. The patient demographics, brand of cement, and microbiology were recorded manually. The primary outcome was the incidence of spacer exchange due to persistent infection and the secondary outcome was the incidence of reinfection after reimplantation. A multivariate logistic regression analysis and Chi-square test were conducted to identify the effect of cement type on the spacer exchange. Results: A total of 334 patients underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI. The spacer exchange rates in the commercial and non-commercial ALBC groups were 6.4% and 25.1%, respectively (p = 0.004). After controlling for confounding factors, there were significant differences between the commercial group and non-commercial groups in the spacer exchange rate (adjusted OR = 0.25; 95% CI = 0.72-0.87, p = 0.029). The use of commercial ALBC was not associated with a lower reinfection rate after reimplantation (p = 0.160). Conclusions: In a two-stage exchange arthroplasty scenario, the spacer comprised of commercial ALBC resulted in a lower spacer exchange rate than the plain bone cement, both of which had additional antibiotics. However, the use of commercial ALBC was not associated with a lower incidence of reinfection following reimplantation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hypoalbuminemia Predicts Failure of Two-Stage Exchange for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip and Knee
    Green, Cody C.
    Valenzuela, Michael M.
    Odum, Susan M.
    Rowe, Taylor M.
    Springer, Bryan D.
    Fehring, Thomas K.
    Otero, Jesse E.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (07) : 1363 - 1368
  • [42] Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Shoulder Infection Is Associated with High Rate of Failure to Reimplant and Mortality
    Akguen, Doruk
    Wietholter, Mats
    Maziak, Nina
    Paksoy, Alp
    Karczewski, Daniel
    Scheibel, Markus
    Moroder, Philipp
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21)
  • [43] Prosthetic joint infection following total hip replacement: results of one-stage versus two-stage exchange
    Wolf, Matthias
    Clar, Heimo
    Friesenbichler, Joerg
    Schwantzer, Gerold
    Bernhardt, Gerwin
    Gruber, Gerald
    Glehr, Mathias
    Leithner, Andreas
    Sadoghi, Patrick
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (07) : 1363 - 1368
  • [44] Prosthetic joint infection following total hip replacement: results of one-stage versus two-stage exchange
    Nitesh Gahlot
    Raj Bahadur
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 2427 - 2428
  • [45] Prosthetic joint infection following total hip replacement: results of one-stage versus two-stage exchange
    Gahlot, Nitesh
    Bahadur, Raj
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (11) : 2427 - 2428
  • [46] Risk factors for early septic failure after two-stage exchange total knee arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection
    Lee, Woo-Suk
    Park, Kwan Kyu
    Cho, Byung-Woo
    Park, Jun Young
    Kim, Inuk
    Kwon, Hyuck Min
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [47] Do one-stage indications predict success following two-stage arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic joint infection?
    Kheir, Michael M.
    Anderson, Christopher G.
    Chiu, Yu-Fen
    Carli, Alberto V.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT INFECTION, 2024, 9 (01) : 75 - 85
  • [48] Two-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Specific Articulating Antibiotic Spacer Design: Reliable Periprosthetic Joint Infection Eradication and Functional Improvement
    Chalmers, Brian P.
    Mabry, Tad M.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Hanssen, Arlen D.
    Perry, Kevin I.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (12) : 3746 - 3753
  • [49] Infection control rate in two-stage exchange for chronic periprosthetic joint infection: a retrospective cohort study focusing on antibiotic-free period
    Haiqi Ding
    Xuhui Yuan
    Yang Chen
    Changyu Huang
    Hongxin Hu
    Yufeng Guo
    Chengguo Huang
    Xinyu Fang
    Wenming Zhang
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 25 (1)
  • [50] High cure rate of periprosthetic hip joint infection with multidisciplinary team approach using standardized two-stage exchange
    Akguen, Doruk
    Mueller, Michael
    Perka, Carsten
    Winkler, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (1)