Effect of binocular disparity on learning anatomy with stereoscopic augmented reality visualization: A double center randomized controlled trial

被引:15
作者
Bogomolova, Katerina [1 ,2 ]
Vorstenbosch, Marc A. T. M. [3 ]
El Messaoudi, Inssaf [4 ]
Holla, Micha [4 ]
Hovius, Steven E. R. [5 ]
van der Hage, Jos A. [1 ,2 ]
Hierck, Beerend P. [6 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, POB 9600,Zone D6-P, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Ctr Innovat Med Educ, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Imaging, Anat, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Vet Med Fac, Dept Anat & Physiol, Clin Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
anatomical education; stereoscopic three-dimensional technology; visual-spatial abilities; SPATIAL ABILITIES; MENTAL ROTATIONS; MEDICAL-STUDENTS; VIRTUAL-REALITY; MOTION PARALLAX; KNOWLEDGE; SCIENCES; MODELS; STEREOPSIS; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1002/ase.2164
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Binocular disparity provides one of the important depth cues within stereoscopic three-dimensional (3D) visualization technology. However, there is limited research on its effect on learning within a 3D augmented reality (AR) environment. This study evaluated the effect of binocular disparity on the acquisition of anatomical knowledge and perceived cognitive load in relation to visual-spatial abilities. In a double-center randomized controlled trial, first-year (bio)medical undergraduates studied lower extremity anatomy in an interactive 3D AR environment either with a stereoscopic 3D view (n = 32) or monoscopic 3D view (n = 34). Visual-spatial abilities were tested with a mental rotation test. Anatomical knowledge was assessed by a validated 30-item written test and 30-item specimen test. Cognitive load was measured by the NASA-TLX questionnaire. Students in the stereoscopic 3D and monoscopic 3D groups performed equally well in terms of percentage correct answers (written test: 47.9 +/- 15.8 vs. 49.1 +/- 18.3; P = 0.635; specimen test: 43.0 +/- 17.9 vs. 46.3 +/- 15.1; P = 0.429), and perceived cognitive load scores (6.2 +/- 1.0 vs. 6.2 +/- 1.3; P = 0.992). Regardless of intervention, visual-spatial abilities were positively associated with the specimen test scores (eta(2) = 0.13, P = 0.003), perceived representativeness of the anatomy test questions (P = 0.010) and subjective improvement in anatomy knowledge (P < 0.001). In conclusion, binocular disparity does not improve learning anatomy. Motion parallax should be considered as another important depth cue that contributes to depth perception during learning in a stereoscopic 3D AR environment.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 98
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
[41]   Spatial Abilities and Anatomy Knowledge Assessment: A Systematic Review [J].
Langlois, Jean ;
Bellemare, Christian ;
Toulouse, Josee ;
Wells, George A. .
ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2017, 10 (03) :235-241
[42]   Spatial abilities and technical skills performance in health care: a systematic review [J].
Langlois, Jean ;
Bellemare, Christian ;
Toulouse, Josee ;
Wells, George A. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 49 (11) :1065-1085
[43]   Sex Differences in Spatial Abilities of Medical Graduates Entering Residency Programs [J].
Langlois, Jean ;
Wells, Georges A. ;
Lecourtois, Marc ;
Bergeron, Germain ;
Yetisir, Elizabeth ;
Martin, Marcel .
ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2013, 6 (06) :368-375
[44]   Stereoscopic segregation of transparent surfaces and the effect of motion contrast [J].
Lankheet, MJM ;
Palmen, M .
VISION RESEARCH, 1998, 38 (05) :659-668
[45]   Virtual reality and brain anatomy: a randomised trial of e-learning instructional designs [J].
Levinson, Anthony J. ;
Weaver, Bruce ;
Garside, Sarah ;
McGinn, Holly ;
Norman, Geoffrey R. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (05) :495-501
[46]   The role of stereopsis in virtual anatomical learning [J].
Luursema, Jan-Maarten ;
Verwey, Willem B. ;
Kommers, Piet A. M. ;
Annema, Jan-Henk .
INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2008, 20 (4-5) :455-460
[47]   Optimizing conditions for computer-assisted anatomical learning [J].
Luursema, Jan-Maarten ;
Verwey, Willem B. ;
Kommers, Piet A. M. ;
Geelkerken, Robert H. ;
Vos, Hans J. .
INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2006, 18 (05) :1123-1138
[48]  
Mayer RE., 2001, MULTIMEDIA LEARNING, P452
[49]   National survey on anatomical sciences in medical education [J].
McBride, Jennifer M. ;
Drake, Richard L. .
ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2018, 11 (01) :7-14
[50]   The impact of curricular change on medical students' knowledge of anatomy [J].
McKeown, PP ;
Heylings, DJA ;
Stevenson, M ;
McKelvey, KJ ;
Nixon, JR ;
McCluskey, DR .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2003, 37 (11) :954-961