Non-coding deep learning models for tomato biotic and abiotic stress classification using microscopic images

被引:1
作者
Choudhary, Manoj [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sentil, Sruthi [1 ]
Jones, Jeffrey B. [1 ]
Paret, Mathews L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, North Florida Res & Educ Ctr, Quincy, FL 32351 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Plant Pathol Dept, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Indian Council Agr Res ICAR, Natl Ctr Integrated Pest Management, New Delhi, India
来源
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
diseases; code-free models; machine learning; tomato; deep learning; biotic stress; abiotic stress; microscopic images; DISEASE DETECTION;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2023.1292643
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Plant disease classification is quite complex and, in most cases, requires trained plant pathologists and sophisticated labs to accurately determine the cause. Our group for the first time used microscopic images (x30) of tomato plant diseases, for which representative plant samples were diagnostically validated to classify disease symptoms using non-coding deep learning platforms (NCDL). The mean F1 scores (SD) of the NCDL platforms were 98.5 (1.6) for Amazon Rekognition Custom Label, 93.9 (2.5) for Clarifai, 91.6 (3.9) for Teachable Machine, 95.0 (1.9) for Google AutoML Vision, and 97.5 (2.7) for Microsoft Azure Custom Vision. The accuracy of the NCDL platform for Amazon Rekognition Custom Label was 99.8% (0.2), for Clarifai 98.7% (0.5), for Teachable Machine 98.3% (0.4), for Google AutoML Vision 98.9% (0.6), and for Apple CreateML 87.3 (4.3). Upon external validation, the model's accuracy of the tested NCDL platforms dropped no more than 7%. The potential future use for these models includes the development of mobile- and web-based applications for the classification of plant diseases and integration with a disease management advisory system. The NCDL models also have the potential to improve the early triage of symptomatic plant samples into classes that may save time in diagnostic lab sample processing.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   NCNet: Deep Learning Network Models for Predicting Function of Non-Coding DNA (vol 10, 432, 2019) [J].
Zhang, Hanyu ;
Hung, Che-Lun ;
Liu, Meiyuan ;
Hu, Xiaoye ;
Lin, Yi-Yang .
FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2019, 10
[42]   Skin cancer disease images classification using deep learning solutions [J].
Mijwil, Maad M. .
MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 80 (17) :26255-26271
[43]   Skin cancer disease images classification using deep learning solutions [J].
Maad M. Mijwil .
Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2021, 80 :26255-26271
[44]   Deep learning based microscopic cell images classification framework using multi-level ensemble [J].
Maurya, Ritesh ;
Pathak, Vinay Kumar ;
Dutta, Malay Kishore .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2021, 211
[45]   Ensemble Learning of Multiple Models Using Deep Learning for Multiclass Classification of Ultrasound Images of Hepatic Masses [J].
Nakata, Norio ;
Siina, Tsuyoshi .
BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2023, 10 (01)
[46]   Fine-grained leukocyte classification with deep residual learning for microscopic images [J].
Qin, Feiwei ;
Gao, Nannan ;
Peng, Yong ;
Wu, Zizhao ;
Shen, Shuying ;
Grudtsin, Artur .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 162 :243-252
[47]   Tomato Leaf Diseases Classification Based on Leaf Images: A Comparison between Classical Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods [J].
Tan, Lijuan ;
Lu, Jinzhu ;
Jiang, Huanyu .
AGRIENGINEERING, 2021, 3 (03) :542-558
[48]   Classification of Plant Seedling Images Using Deep Learning [J].
Alimboyong, Catherine R. ;
Hernandez, Alexander A. ;
Medina, Ruji P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF TENCON 2018 - 2018 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE, 2018, :1839-1844
[49]   Influence of Different Activation Functions on Deep Learning Models in Indoor Scene Images Classification [J].
Basavaraj S. Anami ;
Chetan V. Sagarnal .
Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, 2022, 32 :78-88
[50]   Influence of Different Activation Functions on Deep Learning Models in Indoor Scene Images Classification [J].
Anami, Basavaraj S. ;
Sagarnal, Chetan, V .
PATTERN RECOGNITION AND IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2022, 32 (01) :78-88