Efficacy of Early Intervention Programmes: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Gomez-Cotilla, Ramon [1 ]
de los Angeles Lopez-de-Uralde-Selva, Maria [1 ]
Valero-Aguayo, Luis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaga, Fac Psicol & Logopedia, Malaga, Spain
来源
PSICOLOGIA EDUCATIVA | 2024年 / 30卷 / 01期
关键词
Early intervention; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Developmental delay; Intellectual disability; Autism; Down syndrome; Atencion temprana; Revision sistematica; Metaanalisis; Retraso; Discapacidad intelectual; Autismo; Sindrome de Down; AUTISM; CHILDHOOD; CHILDREN; PRESCHOOLERS; EDUCATION; LANGUAGE; MODEL; CARE;
D O I
10.5093/psed2024a1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Early childhood intervention is a form of intervention aimed at children to overcome difficulties in different areas of their development after birth. There are multiple early intervention programmes, but only a few studies assess their efficacy using data. Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis of early intervention programmes was carried out. Method: Inclusion criteria were considered to be empirical studies, with outcome data on children between 0 and 6 years of age with various developmental problems. The review was conducted in nine databases. Results: Of the total number of studies from 2000 to 2021 in English and Spanish, 40 studies were included that looked at the efficacy of the programmes. Of these, 19 used comparisons with a control group, and 13 used single-subject designs, as well as other designs. The programmes were very diverse, mostly based on behavioural procedures, and aimed at promoting the development of specific areas. The quality of the studies is medium-high. The meta-analysis included 18 studies with a mean effect size d = 0.45 (CI = 0.18, 0.67), with high sample heterogeneity and low study selection bias. Conclusions: Early childhood interventions have a medium and positive efficacy on the skills and abilities of children with developmental problems. The limitations of the reviewed studies are discussed, as well as the need for well-defined programmes, long-term measurements, and comparisons of different types of programmes among them. Antecedentes: La atencion temprana es una forma de intervencion dirigida a ninos y ninas para intentar superar las dificultades en distintas areas de su desarrollo tras el nacimiento. Existen multiples programas, pero pocos estudios comparando con datos su eficacia. Objetivo: Se ha realizado una revision sistematica y un metaanalisis de los programas de atencion temprana. Metodo: Como criterios de inclusion se considero que fuesen estudios empiricos con resultados sobre ninos con diversos problemas de desarrollo entre 0 y 6 anos. La revision se realizo con nueve bases de datos. Resultados: Del total de estudios desde 2000 a 2021 en espanol e ingles se incluyeron 40 estudios que permitian ver la eficacia de los programas. De ellos 19 utilizaron comparaciones frente a un grupo control y 13 con disenos de caso unico, ademas de otros disenos. Los programas de atencion temprana fueron muy diversos, en su mayoria basados en procedimientos conductuales y dirigidos a impulsar el desarrollo de areas especificas. La calidad de los estudios es media-alta. En el metaanalisis se incluyeron 18 estudios con un tamano del efecto medio, d = 0.45 (CI = 0.18, 0.67), con gran heterogeneidad de las muestras y poco sesgo en la seleccion de estudios. Conclusiones: Los programas de atencion temprana presentan una eficacia media y positiva con respecto a las habilidades y capacidades de los ninos y ninas con problemas de desarrollo. Se comentan las limitaciones de los estudios revisados y la necesidad utilizar programas bien definidos, mediciones a largo plazo y comparaciones de diversos tipos de programas entre si.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of ornidazole for pericoronitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Du, Ruobing
    Ba, Kai
    Yang, Yaxin
    Zhao, Yueyue
    Lin, Yupeng
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 20 (01) : 189 - 195
  • [32] Efficacy of oats in dyslipidemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Anqi
    Gao, Jing
    Li, Yingcai
    Qi, Shihao
    Meng, Tiantian
    Yu, Shanshan
    Zhang, Yuqing
    He, Qingyong
    FOOD & FUNCTION, 2024, 15 (07) : 3232 - 3245
  • [33] Efficacy of statins for osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    T. An
    J. Hao
    S. Sun
    R. Li
    M. Yang
    G. Cheng
    M. Zou
    Osteoporosis International, 2017, 28 : 47 - 57
  • [34] Efficacy of acupuncture for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tan, Yawen
    Duan, Ruqian
    Wen, Chuanbiao
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
  • [35] Efficacy and safety of cefepime: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yahav, Dafna
    Paul, Mical
    Fraser, Abigail
    Sarid, Nadav
    Leibovici, Leonard
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 7 (05): : 338 - 348
  • [36] Efficacy and safety of seprafilm: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohri, Yasuhiko
    Kusunoki, Masato
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 32 (08) : 1886 - 1887
  • [37] EFFICACY OF DISULFIRAM REVISITED/SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Aubin, H. J.
    ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM, 2015, 50
  • [38] Efficacy and Safety of Seprafilm: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yasuhiko Mohri
    Masato Kusunoki
    World Journal of Surgery, 2008, 32 : 1886 - 1887
  • [39] Efficacy of statins for osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    An, T.
    Hao, J.
    Sun, S.
    Li, R.
    Yang, M.
    Cheng, G.
    Zou, M.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 28 (01) : 47 - 57
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of daptomycin: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Teresa Rosanova, Maria
    Bes, David
    Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro
    Sberna, Norma
    Herrera-Ramos, Estefania
    Luis Lede, Roberto
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2019, 6