A risk assessment method of aircraft structure damage maintenance interval considering fatigue crack growth and detection rate

被引:5
作者
Zhang, Zhuzhu [1 ]
Mao, Haitao [1 ]
Liu, Yulin [1 ]
Jiao, Peng [1 ]
Hu, Wenlin [1 ]
Shen, Pei [1 ]
机构
[1] 92728th PLA, Shanghai 200443, Peoples R China
来源
EKSPLOATACJA I NIEZAWODNOSC-MAINTENANCE AND RELIABILITY | 2023年 / 25卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Monte Carlo; risk assessment; maintenance interval; crack propagation; detection rate; condition based maintenance; FRACTURE;
D O I
10.17531/ein.2023.1.3
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The accurate assessment of aircraft structure damage risk is the premise of establishing reasonable, economic and reliable maintenance intervals. While many studies have proposed damage risk assessment methods for aircraft structures, these methods lack the quantification of risk. This paper proposed a risk assessment method of aircraft structure damage maintenance interval considering fatigue crack growth rate and crack detection rate. The damage process of aircraft structure was simulated by Monte Carlo simulation to realize the quantitative assessment of aircraft structure damage risk and maintenance interval. Taking an aircraft fleet as an example, the damage risk of its wing structure was simulated and analyzed. The results show that if the risk is controlled within a reasonable range, the maintenance interval should be shortened to 16 flight hours. At the same time, through the analysis of the risk classification standard and the crack detection rate, the quantitative evaluation of the risk classification standard was realized.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Advanced progressive real coded genetic algorithm for nuclear system availability optimization through preventive maintenance scheduling [J].
Aghaie, M. ;
Norouzi, A. ;
Zolfaghari, A. ;
Minuchehr, A. ;
Fard, Z. Mohamadi ;
Tumari, R. .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2013, 60 :64-72
[2]   Fatigue fracture of an AMX aircraft main wheel [J].
Amura, M. ;
Allegrucci, L. ;
De Paolis, F. ;
Bernabei, M. .
ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2013, 27 :194-202
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, MILSTD882E DOD US
[4]   Prediction of aircraft safety incidents using Bayesian inference and hierarchical structures [J].
Arnaldo Valdes, Rosa Maria ;
Fernando Gomez Comendador, V. ;
Perez Sanz, Luis ;
Rodriguez Sanz, Alvaro .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 104 :216-230
[5]   Significant human risk factors in aircraft maintenance technicians [J].
Chang, Yu-Hern ;
Wang, Ying-Chun .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2010, 48 (01) :54-62
[6]   Risk assessment methodologies in maintenance decision making: A review of dependability modelling approaches [J].
Chemweno, Peter ;
Pintelon, Liliane ;
Muchiri, Peter Nganga ;
Van Horenbeek, Adriaan .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 173 :64-77
[7]   Aircraft Maintenance Decision System Based on Real-time Condition Monitoring [J].
Chen, Dehuang ;
Wang, Xiaowei ;
Zhao, Jing .
2012 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INFORMATION AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING, 2012, 29 :765-769
[8]   Risk Assessment of Aero Engine Failure Based on Monte Carlo Simulation [J].
Chen, Hui ;
Li, Longbiao ;
Sun, Youchao .
3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AIRCRAFT AIRWORTHINESS (ISAA 2013), 2014, 80 :415-423
[9]  
Chen Y L, 2022, ACTA AERONUATICA AST, P27614, DOI [10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.27614, DOI 10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.27614]
[10]  
[陈跃良 Chen Yueliang], 2021, [航空学报, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica], V42