An overview of environmental co-benefits and trade-offs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in municipal wastewater management

被引:5
|
作者
Zheng, Xinyu [1 ]
Lam, Ka Leung [2 ]
机构
[1] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Environm Sci & Engn, Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Duke Kunshan Univ, Div Nat & Appl Sci, 8 Duke Ave, Kunshan 215316, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Wastewater treatment; Greenhouse gas emissions reduction; Life cycle assessment; Environmental impact; Environmental performance; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; TREATMENT PLANTS; FOOD WASTE; PHOSPHORUS RECOVERY; ENERGY NEUTRALITY; SYSTEMS; ALTERNATIVES; RECLAMATION; DIGESTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2024.02.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many opportunities are available to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with municipal wastewater management. The vision of low -carbon or carbon -neutral operation of wastewater treatment plants is emerging. Is the vision of low -carbon wastewater management consistent with improving environmental performances? Here, we explored this question using wastewater management life cycle assessment studies that had scenarios with GHG emissions reduction through alternative wastewater treatment options, sludge treatment options, and resource recovery options. Among these options that contribute to GHG emissions reduction, integrating resource recovery (i.e., water, biogas, phosphorus) appears to have greater chances of co -benefits (especially on acidification, eutrophication, and photochemical oxidant formation). In contrast, shifting sludge disposal practices require more attention to their potential trade-offs (especially on eutrophication and toxicity). It is evident that achieving GHG emissions reduction oftentimes involves compromising on other environmental performances. While more GHG emissions reduction and environmental co -benefits can be seen in most of the scenarios and impact categories (over 75% combining), achieving GHG emissions reduction can still lead to deteriorating of at least one of the environmental impact categories in over half of all the scenarios. Instead of exclusively focusing only on GHG emissions mitigation, abatement strategies from municipal wastewater management systems should also consider harnessing environmental co -benefits and alleviating unintended environmental trade-offs. Identifying the potential contributing factors behind environmental trade-offs can also represent opportunities for optimizing the design and operation of these GHG emissions reduction options. Into the future, wastewater management needs to adopt a broader systems perspective considering the wider system boundary and environmental scope.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Review of trade-offs and co-benefits from greenhouse gas mitigation measures in agricultural production
    Verspecht, Ann
    Vandermeulen, Valerie
    Ter Avest, Erik
    Van Huylenbroeck, Guido
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2012, 9 : 147 - 157
  • [2] Co-benefits, trade-offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector
    Bustamante, Mercedes
    Robledo-Abad, Carmenza
    Harper, Richard
    Mbow, Cheikh
    Ravindranat, Nijavalli H.
    Sperling, Frank
    Haberl, Helmut
    Pinto, Alexandre de Siqueira
    Smith, Pete
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2014, 20 (10) : 3270 - 3290
  • [3] Compound environmental impact of urban mitigation strategies: Co-benefits, trade-offs, and unintended consequence
    Wang, Zhi-Hua
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 75
  • [4] An umbrella review of health co-benefits from actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
    Reynolds, Tamzin
    Whitmee, Sarah
    Green, Rosemary
    Anton, Blanca
    Haines, Andy
    LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2024, 8 : S16 - S16
  • [5] Health co-benefits and trade-offs of carbon pricing: a narrative synthesis
    Cuevas, Soledad
    Nachtigall, Daniel
    Jaber, Aimee Aguilar
    Belesova, Kristine
    Falconer, Jane
    Haines, Andy
    Reynolds, Tamzin
    Schuster, Tobias Magnus
    Whitmee, Sarah
    Green, Rosemary
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2024, 24 (10) : 1346 - 1364
  • [6] Agrivoltaics as an SDG enabler: Trade-offs and co-benefits for food security, energy generation and emissions mitigation
    Pandey, Ganesh
    Lyden, Sarah
    Franklin, Evan
    Harrison, Matthew Tom
    RESOURCES ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 19
  • [7] The climate benefits, co-benefits, and trade-offs of green infrastructure: A systematic literature review
    Choi, Changsoon
    Berry, Pam
    Smith, Alison
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 291
  • [8] Scenarios for the environmental impact of fossil fuel power: Co-benefits and trade-offs of carbon capture and storage
    Singh, Bhawna
    Stromman, Anders H.
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    ENERGY, 2012, 45 (01) : 762 - 770
  • [9] Natural disturbance impacts on trade-offs and co-benefits of forest biodiversity and carbon
    Mikolas, Martin
    Svitok, Marek
    Bace, Radek
    Meigs, Garrett W.
    Keeton, William S.
    Keith, Heather
    Buechling, Arne
    Trotsiuk, Volodymyr
    Kozak, Daniel
    Bollmann, Kurt
    Begovic, Kresimir
    Cada, Vojtech
    Chaskovskyy, Oleh
    Ralhan, Dheeraj
    Dusatko, Martin
    Ferencik, Matej
    Frankovic, Michal
    Gloor, Rhiannon
    Hofmeister, Jenyk
    Janda, Pavel
    Kameniar, Ondrej
    Labusova, Jana
    Majdanova, Linda
    Nagel, Thomas A.
    Pavlin, Jakob
    Pettit, Joseph L.
    Rodrigo, Ruffy
    Roibu, Catalin-Constantin
    Rydval, Milos
    Sabatini, Francesco M.
    Schurman, Jonathan
    Synek, Michal
    Vostarek, Ondrej
    Zemlerova, Veronika
    Svoboda, Miroslav
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 288 (1961)
  • [10] Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: current debates on the breadth of REDD+
    Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid J.
    McDermott, Constance
    Vijge, Marjanneke J.
    Cashore, Benjamin
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (06) : 646 - 653