Effects of cage stocking density on the production performance, serum biochemistry, immune level, and intestinal morphology of 2 laying hen breeds

被引:7
作者
Wan, Y. [1 ]
Guan, H. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, D. [3 ]
Ma, R. [1 ]
Qi, R. [1 ]
Li, J. [1 ]
Liu, W. [1 ]
Li, Y. [1 ]
Zhan, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Anim Husb & Vet Med, Anhui Acad Agr Sci, Anhui Key Lab Livestock & Poultry Prod Safety Engn, Hefei 230031, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Agr Univ, Coll Life Sci, Hefei 230036, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Biaowang Farming Co Ltd, Huaibei 235100, Peoples R China
关键词
chicken; breed; cage stocking density; production performance; intestinal morphology; EGG QUALITY; METABOLIZABLE ENERGY; GROUP-SIZE; PARAMETERS; STRAINS; WHITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.japr.2023.100375
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study aimed to determine the effects of different cage stocking densities on the production performance, serum biochemical indices, intestinal morphology and immune levels of Hy-Line Brown and Jinghong laying hens. A total of 432 Hy-Line Brown (n = 216) and Jinghong (n = 216) commercial laying hens were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups according to stocking density: high density (H, 4 birds/cage), medium density (M, 3 birds/cage) and low density (L, 2 birds/cage). In both breeds, the laying rates and Haugh units in the L group were significantly higher than those in the H group (P < 0.05), and the feed-to-egg ratio (feed conversion ratio [FCR]) in the L group was significantly lower than that in the H group (P < 0.05). Additionally, in both breeds, serum triglyceride (TG) activities and corticosterone (CORT) concentrations in the L group were significantly lower than those in the H group. The duodenal villus-to-crypt ratio (VCR) in the L group was significantly higher than that in the H group in both breeds. There were significant interaction effects of breed and stocking density on the laying rate, FCR, Haugh (VH), duodenal VCR and cecal VCR (P < 0.05). Overall, the results of this study indicate that a low stocking density increases the production performance and increases the intestinal mucosal barrier function of laying hens compared to a high stocking density.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Altan A, 2002, TURK J VET ANIM SCI, V26, P695
[2]   Effects of bird age, density, and molt on behavioral profiles of two commercial layer strains in cages [J].
Anderson, KE ;
Davis, GS ;
Jenkins, PK ;
Carroll, AS .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2004, 83 (01) :15-23
[3]  
Bartholomew D. C., 2016, Res. Rev. J. Statistics Math. Sci., V3, P1
[4]   Effects of stocking density and group size on the performance of white and brown Hyline layers in semi-arid conditions [J].
Benyi, K. ;
Norris, D. ;
Tsatsinyane, P. M. .
TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2006, 38 (7-8) :619-624
[5]   FURTHER-STUDIES OF DENSITY AND GROUP-SIZE EFFECTS IN CAGED HENS OF STOCKS DIFFERING IN FEARFUL BEHAVIOR - PRODUCTIVITY AND BEHAVIOR [J].
CRAIG, JV .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1989, 68 (01) :9-16
[6]  
Dale N., 1994, J. Appl. Poult. Res, V3, P101, DOI [10.1093/japr/3.1.101, DOI 10.1093/JAPR/3.1.101]
[7]   Stocking density effects on male broilers grown to 1.8 kilograms of body weight [J].
Dozier, WA ;
Thaxton, JP ;
Purswell, JL ;
Olanrewaju, HA ;
Branton, SL ;
Roush, WB .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2006, 85 (02) :344-351
[8]   Effect of light intensity and stocking density on the performance, egg quality, and feather condition of laying hens reared in a battery cage system over the first laying period [J].
Erensoy, Kadir ;
Sarica, Musa ;
Noubandiguim, Moise ;
Dur, Mete ;
Aslan, Resul .
TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2021, 53 (02)
[9]   Effect of stocking density and sex on growth performance, meat quality, and intestinal barrier function in broiler chickens [J].
Goo, D. ;
Kim, J. H. ;
Choi, H. S. ;
Park, G. H. ;
Han, G. P. ;
Kil, D. Y. .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2019, 98 (03) :1153-1160
[10]   Effects of prebiotic, protein level, and stocking density on performance, immunity, and stress indicators of broilers [J].
Houshmand, M. ;
Azhar, K. ;
Zulkifli, I. ;
Bejo, M. H. ;
Kamyab, A. .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2012, 91 (02) :393-401