A decision-making guide for online content regulation

被引：0

作者：

Svantesson, Dan ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Bond Univ, Fac Law, Robina, Qld 4229, Australia

来源：

ALTERNATIVE LAW JOURNAL | 2024年 / 49卷 / 01期

关键词：

Online/cyber law; content regulation; data privacy; defamation;

D O I：

10.1177/1037969X241231327

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

This article examines the seven standard questions that must be confronted in nearly all decisions in the online content regulation field. By mapping out and discussing those standard questions, the article may hopefully aid both legislators and judges engaged in online content regulation. The checklist of questions canvassed here may also be used as a tool to evaluate laws aimed at online content regulation as well as judgments made within this field.

引用

页码：13 / 18

页数：6

共 22 条

[11]

[Anonymous], 2016, Article 3 of the Regulation on Registration and Administration of Social Organizations

[12]

Commonwealth of Australia Parliament, 2023, COMM LEG AM COMB MIS

[13]

Geiger Christophe, 2020, OXFORD HDB ONLINE IN, P566

[14]

Goujard C., 2021, POLITICO

[15]

Jerker Dan, 2017, SOLVING INTERNET JUR

[16]

Keller D, 2019, AEGIS SERIES PAPER, V1902

[17]

Keller Daphne, 2018, WHY DC PUNDITS MUST

[18]

Mendis Sunimal, 2020, The OxfordHandbook of Online Intermediary Liability, P544

[19]

Standing Council of Attorneys-General, 2023, COMMUNIQUE 0922, P3

[20] Jurisdiction in 3D - "scope of (remedial) jurisdiction" as a third dimension of jurisdiction [J].

Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. .

JOURNAL OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2016, 12 (01) :60-76

← 1 2 3 →