Characterization of 250 MeV Protons from the Varian ProBeam PBS System for FLASH Radiation Therapy

被引:8
作者
Charyyev, Serdar [1 ]
Chang, Chih-Wei [2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Mingyao [2 ,3 ]
Lin, Liyong [2 ,3 ]
Langen, Katja [2 ,3 ]
Dhabaan, Anees [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
FLASH; proton therapy; commissioning; IONIZATION-CHAMBER; IRRADIATION; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.14338/IJPT-22-00027.1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Shoot-through proton FLASH radiation therapy has been proposed where the highest energy is extracted from a cyclotron to maximize the dose rate (DR). Although our proton pencil beam scanning system can deliver 250 MeV (the highest energy), this energy is not used clinically, and as such, 250 MeV has yet to be characterized during clinical commissioning. We aim to characterize the 250-MeV proton beam from the Varian ProBeam system for FLASH and assess the usability of the clinical monitoring ionization chamber (MIC) for FLASH use. We measured the following data for beam commissioning: integral depth dose curve, spot sigma, and absolute dose. To evaluate the MIC, we measured output as a function of beam current. To characterize a 250 MeV FLASH beam, we measured (1) the central axis DR as a function of current and spot spacing and arrangement, (2) for a fixed spot spacing, the maximum field size that achieves FLASH DR (ie, > 40 Gy/s), and (3) DR reproducibility. All FLASH DR measurements were performed using an ion chamber for the absolute dose, and irradiation times were obtained from log files. We verified dose measurements using EBT-XD films and irradiation times using a fast, pixelated spectral detector. R90 and R80 from integral depth dose were 37.58 and 37.69 cm, and spot sigma at the isocenter were sigma(x) = 3.336 and sigma(y) = 3.332 mm, respectively. The absolute dose output was measured as 0.343 Gy*mm(2)/MU for the commissioning conditions. Output was stable for beam currents up to 15 nA and gradually increased to 12-fold for 115 nA. Dose and DR depended on beam current, spot spacing, and arrangement and could be reproduced with 6.4% and 4.2% variations, respectively. Although FLASH was achieved and the largest field size that delivers FLASH DR was determined as 35 x 35 mm(2), the current MIC has DR dependence, and users should measure dose and DR independently each time for their FLASH applications.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 289
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] A Quantitative Analysis of the Role of Oxygen Tension in FLASH Radiation Therapy
    Petersson, Kristoffer
    Adrian, Gabriel
    Butterworth, Karl
    McMahon, Stephen J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 107 (03): : 539 - 547
  • [32] Comparative toxicity of synchrotron and conventional radiation therapy based on total and partial body irradiation in a murine model
    Smyth, Lloyd M. L.
    Donoghue, Jacqueline F.
    Ventura, Jessica A.
    Livingstone, Jayde
    Bailey, Tracy
    Day, Liam R. J.
    Crosbie, Jeffrey C.
    Rogers, Peter A. W.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [33] Pencil beam scanning proton FLASH maintains tumor control while normal tissue damage is reduced in a mouse model
    Sorensen, Brita Singers
    Sitarz, Mateusz Krzysztof
    Ankjaergaard, Christina
    Johansen, Jacob G.
    Andersen, Claus E.
    Kanouta, Eleni
    Grau, Cai
    Poulsen, Per
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 175 : 178 - 184
  • [34] In vivo validation and tissue sparing factor for acute damage of pencil beam scanning proton FLASH
    Sorensen, Brita Singers
    Sitarz, Mateusz Krzysztof
    Ankjaergaard, Christina
    Johansen, Jacob
    Andersen, Claus E.
    Kanouta, Eleni
    Overgaard, Cathrine
    Grau, Cai
    Poulsen, Per
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 167 : 109 - 115
  • [35] Application of Timepix3 based CdTe spectral sensitive photon counting detector for PET imaging
    Turecek, Daniel
    Jakubek, Jan
    Trojanova, Eliska
    Sefc, Ludek
    Kolarova, Vera
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2018, 895 : 84 - 89
  • [36] Towards FLASH proton therapy: the impact of treatment planning and machine characteristics on achievable dose rates
    van de Water, Steven
    Safai, Sairos
    Schippers, Jacobus M.
    Weber, Damien C.
    Lomax, Antony J.
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2019, 58 (10) : 1463 - 1469
  • [37] Proton beam dosimetry at ultra-high dose rates (FLASH): Evaluation of GAFchromic™ (EBT3, EBT-XD) and OrthoChromic (OC-1) film performances
    Villoing, Daphnee
    Koumeir, Charbel
    Bongrand, Arthur
    Guertin, Arnaud
    Haddad, Ferid
    Metivier, Vincent
    Poirier, Freddy
    Potiron, Vincent
    Servagent, Noel
    Supiot, Stephane
    Delpon, Gregory
    Chiavassa, Sophie
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (04) : 2732 - 2745
  • [38] Biological Benefits of Ultra-high Dose Rate FLASH Radiotherapy: Sleeping Beauty Awoken
    Vozenin, M-C
    Hendry, J. H.
    Limoli, C. L.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 31 (07) : 407 - 415
  • [39] The Advantage of FLASH Radiotherapy Confirmed in Mini-pig and Cat-cancer Patients
    Vozenin, Marie-Catherine
    De Fornel, Pauline
    Petersson, Kristoffer
    Favaudon, Vincent
    Jaccard, Maud
    Germond, Jean-Francois
    Petit, Benoit
    Burki, Marco
    Ferrand, Gisele
    Patin, David
    Bouchaab, Hanan
    Ozsahin, Mahmut
    Bochud, Francois
    Bailat, Claude
    Devauchelle, Patrick
    Bourhis, Jean
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 25 (01) : 35 - 42
  • [40] Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold?
    Wilson, Joseph D.
    Hammond, Ester M.
    Higgins, Geoff S.
    Petersson, Kristoffer
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 9