Development and evaluation of the MiCheck® Prostate test for clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:1
作者
Shore, Neal D. [1 ]
Polikarpov, Dmitry M. [2 ]
Pieczonka, Christopher M. [3 ,4 ]
Henderson, R. Jonathan [1 ]
Bailen, James L. [1 ]
Saltzstein, Daniel R. [1 ]
Concepcion, Raoul S. [1 ]
Beebe-Dimmer, Jennifer L. [5 ,6 ]
Ruterbusch, Julie J. [5 ,6 ]
Levin, Rachel A. [7 ]
Wissmueller, Sandra [7 ]
Le, Thao Ho [7 ]
Gillatt, David A. [2 ]
Chan, Daniel W. [8 ]
Deng, Niantao [7 ]
Siddireddy, Jaya Sowjanya [2 ,7 ]
Lu, Yanling [7 ]
Campbelle, Douglas H. [7 ]
Walsh, Bradley J. [7 ]
机构
[1] CUSP LLC Res Consortium, Annandale, VA 22003 USA
[2] Macquarie Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sydney, Australia
[3] Res US Urol Partners, Nolensville, TN USA
[4] Res Associated Med Profess, Nolensville, TN USA
[5] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI USA
[6] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
[7] Minom Int Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Ctr Biomarker Discovery & Translat, Dept Pathol, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Prostate; Biomarker; Clinically significant cancer; Clinical study; NPV; HEALTH INDEX; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.08.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: There is a clinical need to identify patients with an elevated PSA who would benefit from prostate biopsy due to the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSCaP). We have previously reported the development of the MiCheck (R) Test for clinically significant prostate cancer. Here, we report MiCheck's further development and incorporation of the Roche Cobas standard clinical chemistry analyzer. Objectives: To further develop and adapt the MiCheck (R) Prostate test so it can be performed using a standard clinical chemistry analyzer and characterize its performance using the MiCheck-01 clinical trial sample set. Design, settings, and participants: About 358 patient samples from the MiCheck-01 US clinical trial were used for the development of the MiCheck (R) Prostate test. These consisted of 46 controls, 137 non-CaP, 62 non-CSCaP, and 113 CSCaP. Methods: Serum analyte concentrations for cellular growth factors were determined using custom-made Luminex-based R&D Systems multi-analyte kits. Analytes that can also be measured using standard chemistry analyzers were examined for their ability to contribute to an algorithm with high sensitivity for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Samples were then re-measured using a Roche Cobas analyzer for development of the final algorithm. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Logistic regression modeling with Monte Carlo cross-validation was used to identify Human Epidydimal Protein 4 (HE4) as an analyte able to significantly improve the algorithm specificity at 95% sensitivity. A final model Results: The MiCheck (R) logistic regression model was developed and consisted of PSA, %free PSA, DRE, and HE4. The model differentiated clinically significant cancer from no cancer or not-clinically significant cancer with AUC of 0.85, sensitivity of 95%, and specificity of 50%. Applying the MiCheck (R) test to all evaluable 358 patients from the MiCheck-01 study demonstrated that up to 50% of unnecessary biopsies could be avoided while delaying diagnosis of only 5.3% of Gleason Score (GS) >= 3+4 cancers, 1.8% of GS >= 4+3 cancers and no cancers of GS 8 to 10. It can be performed in a clinical laboratory using a Roche Cobas clinical chemistry analyzer. The MiCheck (R) Prostate test could assist in reducing unnecessary prostate biopsies with a marginal number of patients experiencing a delayed diagnosis. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:454.e9 / 454.e16
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Unintended consequences of decreased PSA-based prostate cancer screening
    Ahlering, Thomas
    Huynh, Linda My
    Kaler, Kamaljot S.
    Williams, Stephen
    Osann, Kathryn
    Joseph, Jean
    Lee, David
    Davis, John W.
    Abaza, Ronney
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Patel, Vipul
    Kim, Isaac Yi
    Porter, James
    Hu, Jim C.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (03) : 489 - 496
  • [2] Prostate Needle Biopsy Outcomes in the Era of the US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation against Prostate Specific Antigen Based Screening
    Banerji, John S.
    Wolff, Erika M.
    Massman, John D., III
    Odem-Davis, Katherine
    Porter, Christopher R.
    Corman, John M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (01) : 66 - 73
  • [3] A Four-kallikrein Panel Predicts High-grade Cancer on Biopsy: Independent Validation in a Community Cohort
    Braun, Katharina
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Lilja, Hans
    Bjartell, Anders S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 505 - 511
  • [4] Predicting High-Grade Cancer at Ten-Core Prostate Biopsy Using Four Kallikrein Markers Measured in Blood in the ProtecT Study
    Bryant, Richard J.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Robinson, Mary C.
    Kumar, Rajeev
    Marsden, Luke
    Davis, Michael
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Donovan, Jenny
    Neal, David E.
    Lilja, Hans
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2015, 107 (07):
  • [5] Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Screening for Prostate Cancer Revisiting the Evidence
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (18): : 1866 - 1868
  • [6] A Multicenter Study of [-2]Pro-Prostate Specific Antigen Combined With Prostate Specific Antigen and Free Prostate Specific Antigen for Prostate Cancer Detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml Prostate Specific Antigen Range
    Catalona, William J.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Sanda, Martin G.
    Wei, John T.
    Klee, George G.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Slawin, Kevin M.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    Loeb, Stacy
    Broyles, Dennis L.
    Shin, Sanghyuk S.
    Cruz, Amabelle B.
    Chan, Daniel W.
    Sokoll, Lori J.
    Roberts, William L.
    van Schaik, Ron H. N.
    Mizrahi, Isaac A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (05) : 1650 - 1655
  • [7] SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN COMPLEXED TO ALPHA-1-ANTICHYMOTRYPSIN AS AN INDICATOR OF PROSTATE-CANCER
    CHRISTENSSON, A
    BJORK, T
    NILSSON, O
    DAHLEN, U
    MATIKAINEN, MT
    COCKETT, ATK
    ABRAHAMSSON, PA
    LILJA, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (01) : 100 - 105
  • [8] Multicenter Evaluation of the Prostate Health Index to Detect Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Biopsy Naive Men
    de la Calle, Claire
    Patil, Dattatraya
    Wei, John T.
    Scherr, Douglas S.
    Sokoll, Lori
    Chan, Daniel W.
    Siddiqui, Javed
    Mosquera, Juan Miguel
    Rubin, Mark A.
    Sanda, Martin G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [9] Biomarkers for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: contemporary clinical data and future directions
    Eyrich, Nicholas W.
    Morgan, Todd M.
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (07) : 3089 - 3103
  • [10] Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Fenton, Joshua J.
    Weyrich, Meghan S.
    Durbin, Shauna
    Liu, Yu
    Bang, Heejung
    Melnikow, Joy
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (18): : 1914 - 1931