Reducing bias due to misclassified exposures using instrumental variables

被引:0
|
作者
Manuel, Christopher [1 ]
Sinha, Samiran [1 ]
Wang, Suojin [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Stat, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Bayesian inference; bias; identifiability; instrumental variables; logistic model; misclassification; BREAST-CANCER; NONDIFFERENTIAL MISCLASSIFICATION; NONPARAMETRIC IDENTIFICATION; REGRESSION-MODELS; INSURANCE STATUS; RATIOS;
D O I
10.1002/cjs.11705
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Exposures are often misclassified in observational studies. Any analysis that does not make proper adjustments for misclassification may result in biased estimates of model parameters, resulting in distorted inference. Settings where a multicategory exposure variable has more than two nominal categories or where no validation data are available to assess misclassification probabilities are common in practice but seldom considered in the literature. This article presents a novel method of analyzing cohort data with a misclassified, multicategory exposure variable and a binary response variable that uses instrumental variables in lieu of a validation dataset. First, a sufficient condition is obtained for model identifiability. Then, methods for model estimation and inference are proposed after adopting a sufficient condition for identifiability. We consider a variational Bayesian inference procedure aided by automatic differentiation along with Markov chain Monte Carlo-based computation. Operating characteristics of the proposed methods are assessed through simulation studies. For the purpose of illustration, the proposed Bayesian methods are applied to the U.S. breast cancer mortality data sampled from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database, where reported treatment therapy is the misclassified multicategory exposure variable.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 530
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correcting for Misclassified Binary Regressors Using Instrumental Variables
    Haider, Steven J.
    Stephens, Melvin
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2024,
  • [2] Using Instrumental Variables to Address Bias From Unobserved Confounders
    Maciejewski, Matthew L.
    Brookhart, M. Alan
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (21): : 2124 - 2125
  • [3] Bias and efficiency loss due to misclassified responses in binary regression
    Neuhaus, JM
    BIOMETRIKA, 1999, 86 (04) : 843 - 855
  • [4] Genetic instrumental variables to adjust for collider bias
    Cai, Siyang
    Hartley, April
    Mahmoud, Osama
    Tilling, Kate
    Dudbridge, Frank
    HUMAN HEREDITY, 2022, VOL. (SUPPL 1) : 34 - 34
  • [5] Using instrumental variables for assessing the overall bias of size-number relationships
    School of Forest Resources, University of Arkansas, Monticello, AR 71656, United States
    J. Sustainable For., 2007, 4 (83-96): : 83 - 96
  • [6] Instrumental variables as bias amplifiers with general outcome and confounding
    Ding, P.
    Vanderweele, T. J.
    Robins, J. M.
    BIOMETRIKA, 2017, 104 (02) : 291 - 302
  • [7] A probabilistic bias analysis for misclassified categorical exposures, with application to oral anti-hyperglycaemic drugs
    Arfe, Andrea
    Nicotra, Federica
    Ghirardi, Arianna
    Simonetti, Monica
    Lapi, Francesco
    Sturkenboom, Miriam
    Corrao, Giovanni
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 (12) : 1443 - 1450
  • [8] Matched case-control data with a misclassified exposure: what can be done with instrumental variables?
    Manuel, Christopher M.
    Sinha, Samiran
    Wang, Suojin
    BIOSTATISTICS, 2021, 22 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [9] Investigation of the Bias from Using Marginal effect sizes of instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization
    Yang, Yihe
    Lorincz-Comi, Noah
    Zhu, Xiaofeng
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 48 (07) : 393 - 393
  • [10] Bias and Bias Correction in Multisite Instrumental Variables Analysis of Heterogeneous Mediator Effects
    Reardon, Sean F.
    Unlu, Fatih
    Zhu, Pei
    Bloom, Howard S.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2014, 39 (01) : 53 - 86