Potential of on-demand services for urban travel

被引:25
作者
Gerzinic, Nejc [1 ]
van Oort, Niels [1 ]
Hoogendoorn-Lanser, Sascha [2 ]
Cats, Oded [1 ]
Hoogendoorn, Serge [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Transport & Planning, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Mobility-on-demand; Ride-hailing; Urban mobility; Stated preference; Choice modelling; Latent class; RESPONSIVE TRANSPORT; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; RIDE; UBER; MOBILITY; COMPLEMENT; TRANSIT; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1007/s11116-022-10278-9
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
On-demand mobility services are promising to revolutionise urban travel, but preliminary studies are showing they may actually increase total vehicle miles travelled, worsening road congestion in cities. In this study, we assess the demand for on-demand mobility services in urban areas, using a stated preference survey, to understand the potential impact of introducing on-demand services on the current modal split. The survey was carried out in the Netherlands and offered respondents a choice between bike, car, public transport and on-demand services. 1,063 valid responses are analysed with a multinomial logit and a latent class choice model. By means of the latter, we uncover four distinctive groups of travellers based on the observed choice behaviour. The majority of the sample, the Sharing-ready cyclists (55%), are avid cyclists and do not see on-demand mobility as an alternative for making urban trips. Two classes, Tech-ready individuals (27%) and Flex-ready individuals (9%) would potentially use on-demand services: the former is fairly time-sensitive and would thus use on-demand service if they were sufficiently fast. The latter is highly cost-sensitive, and would therefore use the service primarily if it is cheap. The fourth class, Flex-sceptic individuals (9%) shows very limited potential for using on-demand services.
引用
收藏
页码:1289 / 1321
页数:33
相关论文
共 62 条
[11]  
Bierlaire M, 2020, Technical Report TRANSP-OR 200605
[12]   Simulation-based optimization of service areas for pooled ride-hailing operators [J].
Bischoff, Joschka ;
Kaddoura, Ihab ;
Maciejewski, Michal ;
Nagel, Kai .
9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AMBIENT SYSTEMS, NETWORKS AND TECHNOLOGIES (ANT 2018) / THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (SEIT-2018) / AFFILIATED WORKSHOPS, 2018, 130 :816-823
[13]  
Briggs J., 2019, WELCOME FACTORANALYZ
[14]   Preferences toward Bus Alternatives in Rural Areas of the Netherlands: A Stated Choice Experiment [J].
Bronsvoort, Kristel ;
Alonso-Gonzalez, Maria ;
Van Oort, Niels ;
Molin, Eric ;
Hoogendoorn, Serge .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2021, 2675 (12) :524-533
[15]  
Cagle S., 2019, ONEZERO
[16]  
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, 2020, STATL
[17]   Connecting e-hailing to mass transit platform: Analysis of relative spatial position [J].
Chen, Peng ;
Nie, Yu .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2017, 77 :444-461
[18]  
ChoiceMetrics, 2018, NGENE1 2 US MAN REF
[19]   Modelling preferences for smart modes and services: A case study in Lisbon [J].
Choudhury, Charisma F. ;
Yang, Lang ;
de Abreu e Silva, Joao ;
Ben-Akiva, Moshe .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 115 :15-31
[20]  
Circella G., 2016, WHAT AFFECTS U.S. PASSENGER TRAVEL? CURRENT TRENDS AND FUTURE