Organizational and occupational health issues with working remotely during the pandemic: a scoping review of remote work and health

被引:4
|
作者
Lyzwinski, Lynnette-Natalia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, McGill Med Sch, Lady Davis Inst, Ctr Clin Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Luxembourg, Fac Humanities Educ & Social Sci, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
关键词
remote work; telework; COVID-19; well-being; mental health; stress; workplace; productivity; job satisfaction; leadership; work-life balance; COVID-19; HOME; IMPACT; PRODUCTIVITY; LIFE;
D O I
10.1093/joccuh/uiae005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Stay-at-home orders during the COVID-19 global pandemic created unprecedented challenges for workers whose work was transferred to the home setting. Little is presently known about the benefits and the challenges associated with global remote work on well-being and mental health, work-life balance, job satisfaction, productivity, home office adaptability, and gender equality.Methods: A scoping review of PubMed/Medline was undertaken in October 2021 to better understand these broad dimensions associated with remote worker health, well-being, and the home office workspace. The review focused on white-collar workers who undertook remote work during each of the lockdown waves from March 2020 to 2021.Results: A total of 62 studies were included in the review, which spanned Asia, North America, South America, and Europe. Overall, workers seemed to enjoy remote work, but productivity varied. The main setbacks associated with remote work included feelings of isolation and loneliness, which negatively influenced well-being. Social support from management and contact with colleagues mitigated this. Leadership style also influenced remote worker well-being. Overall, women suffered from lower levels of remote work well-being and productivity, especially if they had children. The home office and its adaptability were integral for successful remote work. Work-life balance was affected in some workers who struggled with heavier workloads or family duties.Conclusions: To promote well-being and successful remote work, isolation and loneliness should be reduced through greater contact with colleagues and managers. Managers should promote family friendly policies that may support work-life balance and reduce gender inequities in remote work. What is already known about the topic Remote work increased during the pandemic as a result of isolation measures and new working-from-home policies. Remote work introduced new challenges and benefits. Research on the workplace environment and health has shown that work can impact health and well-being.What this study adds This research presents the unique challenges and benefits that were identified with working remotely. This review addresses health and well-being issues that are specific to remote work, beyond simply exploring the physical work office.How might this study affect research and policy? The review makes recommendations that could influence organizational working relationships and working-from-home policies. These include recommendations for promoting psychological well-being during remote work such as reducing isolation and loneliness. It also includes recommendations on organizational leadership and management approaches. It makes recommendations for the home office space.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Scoping review on job control and occupational health in the manufacturing context
    Rosen, Patricia H.
    Wischniewski, Sascha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 102 (5-8): : 2285 - 2296
  • [42] Occupational patterns of families living with a health condition: A scoping review
    Ranger, Marie-Christine
    Bosse, Stephanie
    Martini, Rose
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2021, 28 (07) : 498 - 519
  • [43] Occupational health risk assessment methods in China: A scoping review
    Zhou, Lifang
    Xue, Panqi
    Zhang, Yixin
    Wei, Fang
    Zhou, Jiena
    Wang, Shasha
    Hu, Yong
    Lou, Xiaoming
    Zou, Hua
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [44] A scoping review on advantages and drawbacks of nanotechnology in the field of occupational health
    Feyzi, Vafa
    Alboghobeish, Ali
    Esmaeili, Sayed Vahid
    Zendehdel, Rezvan
    Dehghan, Somayeh Farhang
    Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering, 2024, 9 (04) : 593 - 615
  • [45] Strategies for Implementing Occupational eMental Health Interventions: Scoping Review
    Bernard, Renaldo M.
    Toppo, Claudia
    Raggi, Alberto
    de Mul, Marleen
    de Miquel, Carlota
    Pugliese, Maria Teresa
    van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M.
    Ortiz-Tallo, Ana
    Salvador-Carulla, Luis
    Lukersmith, Sue
    Hakkaart-van Roijen, Leona
    Merecz-Kot, Dorota
    Staszewska, Kaja
    Sabariego, Carla
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (06)
  • [46] Scoping review on job control and occupational health in the manufacturing context
    Patricia H. Rosen
    Sascha Wischniewski
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2019, 102 : 2285 - 2296
  • [47] Characterizing Organizational Health Equity Capacity Assessments for Public Health Organizations: A Scoping Review
    Marcus, Rachel
    Nakra, Nidhi Monga
    Porter, Keshia M. Pollack M.
    PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2024, 139 (01) : 26 - 38
  • [48] Policies on mental health in the workplace during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review
    Villarreal-Zegarra, David
    Mahony Reategui-Rivera, C.
    Sabastizagal-Vela, Iselle
    Angel Burgos-Flores, Miguel
    Alejandra Cama-Ttito, Nieves
    Rosales-Rimache, Jaime
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (07):
  • [49] A Scoping Review of Psychosocial Risks to Health Workers during the Covid-19 Pandemic
    Franklin, Paula
    Gkiouleka, Anna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (05) : 120
  • [50] Health care workers’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review
    Souaad Chemali
    Almudena Mari-Sáez
    Charbel El Bcheraoui
    Heide Weishaar
    Human Resources for Health, 20