Techno-economic and carbon dioxide emission assessment of carbon black production

被引:6
|
作者
Rosner, Fabian [1 ,2 ]
Bhagde, Trisha [3 ]
Slaughter, Daniel S. [4 ]
Zorba, Vassilia [3 ,5 ]
Stokes-Draut, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Energy Technol Area, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Renewable Energy & Chem Technol Lab, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Laser Technol Grp, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Chem Sci Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mech Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Carbon black; Techno-economics; CO2; emissions; Efficiency; Tail gas utilization; Hydrogen;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140224
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The over 15 million metric tonnes of carbon black produced annually emit carbon dioxide in the range of 29-79 million metric tonnes each year. With the renaissance of carbon black in many new renewable energy applications as well as the growing transportation sector, where carbon black is used as a rubber reinforcement agent in car tires, the carbon black market is expected to grow by 66% over the next 9 years. As such, it is important to better understand energy intensity and carbon dioxide emissions of carbon black production. In this work, the furnace black process is studied in detail using process models to provide insights into mass and energy balances, economics, and potential pathways for lowering the environmental impact of carbon black production. Current state-of-the-art carbon black facilities typically flare the tail gas of the carbon black reactor. While low in heating value, this tail gas contains considerable amounts of energy and flaring this tail gas leads to low overall efficiency (39.6%). The efficiency of the furnace black process can be improved if the tail gas is used to produce electricity. However, the high capital investment cost and increased operating costs make it difficult to operate electricity generation from the tail gas economically. Steam co-generation (together with electricity generation) on the other hand is shown to substantially improve energy efficiency as well as economics, provided that steam users are nearby. Steam co-generation can be achieved via back-pressure steam turbines so that the low-pressure exhaust steam (similar to 2 bar/120 degrees C) can be used locally for heating or drying purposes. Furthermore, the potential of utilizing hydrogen to reduce carbon dioxide emissions is investigated. Using hydrogen as fuel for the carbon black reactor instead of natural gas is shown to reduce the carbon dioxide footprint by 19%. However, current prices of hydrogen lead to a steep increase in the levelized cost of carbon black (47%).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Techno-Economic Assessment of Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture and Utilization
    Zhang, Zhiwei
    Oh, Dong-Hoon
    Nguyen, Vo Dat
    Lee, Chang-Ha
    Lee, Jae-Cheol
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2023, 37 (08) : 5961 - 5975
  • [32] Carbon credit reduction: A techno-economic analysis of ?drop-in? fuel production
    Velvizhi, G.
    Nair, Rishika
    Goswami, Chandamita
    Arumugam, Senthil Kumar
    Shetti, Nagaraj P.
    Aminabhavi, Tejraj M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2023, 316
  • [33] Life Cycle and Techno-Economic Assessment Templates for Emerging Carbon Management Technologies
    Faber, Grant
    Mangin, Christophe
    Sick, Volker
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 2
  • [34] Techno-economic assessment of carbon-negative algal biodiesel for transport solutions
    Taylor, Benjamin
    Xiao, Ning
    Sikorski, Janusz
    Yong, Minloon
    Harris, Tom
    Helme, Tim
    Smallbone, Andrew
    Bhave, Amit
    Kraft, Markus
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 106 : 262 - 274
  • [35] Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production
    Qiao, Yuanting
    Liu, Weishan
    Guo, Ruonan
    Sun, Shuzhuang
    Zhang, Shuming
    Bailey, Josh J.
    Fang, Mengxiang
    Wu, Chunfei
    FUEL, 2023, 332
  • [36] Techno-economic and carbon emission analyses of a methanol-based international renewable energy supply chain
    Ong, Chong Wei
    Lin, Jian-Xun
    Tsai, Meng-Lin
    Thoe, Ka Sin
    Chen, Cheng-Liang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 49 (1572-1585) : 1572 - 1585
  • [37] Combined electrification and carbon capture for low-carbon cement: Techno-economic assessment of different designs
    Varnier, Leonardo
    d'Amore, Federico
    Clausen, Kim
    Melitos, Georgios
    de Groot, Bart
    Bezzo, Fabrizio
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2025, 498
  • [38] Carbon capture and biomass in industry: A techno-economic analysis and comparison of negative emission options
    Yang, F.
    Meerman, J. C.
    Faaij, A. P. C.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 144
  • [39] Techno-economic assessment of dimethyl carbonate production based on carbon capture and utilization and power-to-fuel technology
    Kontou, V
    Grimekis, D.
    Braimakis, K.
    Karellas, S.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 157
  • [40] Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and dry reforming of methane
    Li, Jianan
    Qin, Changlei
    Lv, Zongze
    Gao, Chang
    Chen, Liangyong
    Xu, Shaojun
    ENERGY, 2025, 316