Mixed Optimization Approach for Low-Thrust Perturbed Rendezvous via Neural Networks

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, An-Yi [1 ]
Zhang, Tian-Jiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Xian Satellite Control Ctr, State Key Lab Astronaut Dynam, Xian 710043, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Orbit rendezvous; mixed optimization; simplified indirect method; neural network; TRAJECTORY OPTIMIZATION; TRANSFERS;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3358336
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study proposes a new model to combine the advantages of the indirect method, neural network, and evolutionary algorithm for the optimization of long-duration, low-thrust orbit rendezvous problems in low Earth orbits. The strategy of dividing the trajectory into three stages with fixed laws of thrust (the second stage keeps coasting without thrust) in the previous studies is inherited, in which the orbit changes of each stage are the decision variables and allocated evenly to each revolution. We derive a new simplified indirect method of the single-revolution transfer to replace the fixed-direction solution when evaluating the total velocity increment in the global optimization framework based on the differential evolution algorithm. Two neural networks are trained and applied to further accelerate the solving process. A correction algorithm for obtaining the trajectory and thrust laws of high-precision numerical dynamics is also proposed. The simulation results prove that the mixed model can obtain better solutions compared with previous methods because the simplified indirect method ensures the satisfaction of the first-order necessary condition. The neural networks can avoid the time-consuming shooting process of the indirect method and decrease the optimization time to less than 1 s. Moreover, the correction algorithm just requires five iteration steps to obtain the high-precision solution. The method can be applied for both approximate mission analysis and precise trajectory generation for orbit transfers in low Earth orbits.
引用
收藏
页码:17261 / 17272
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Convex Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization with No-Thrust Constraints and Moving Target
    Hofmann, Christian
    Topputo, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2024, 61 (03) : 889 - 899
  • [22] Homotopy method for optimization of variable-specific-impulse low-thrust trajectories
    Chi, Zhemin
    Yang, Hongwei
    Chen, Shiyu
    Li, Junfeng
    ASTROPHYSICS AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2017, 362 (11)
  • [23] Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization in Kustaanheimo-Stiefel Variables
    Korneev, K. R.
    Trofimov, S. P.
    COSMIC RESEARCH, 2024, 62 (03) : 256 - 265
  • [24] Low-thrust trajectory optimization for the solar system pony express
    Pascarella, Alex
    Woollands, Robyn
    Pellegrini, Etienne
    Net, Marc Sanchez
    Xie, Hua
    Vander Hook, Joshua
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2023, 203 : 280 - 290
  • [25] Optimization of Low-Thrust Reconfiguration Maneuvers for Spacecraft Flying in Formation
    Massari, Mauro
    Bernelli-Zazzera, Franco
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2009, 32 (05) : 1629 - 1638
  • [26] Rapid Trajectory Design for Low-Thrust Many-Revolution Rendezvous Using Analytical Derivations
    Hu, Jincheng
    Yang, Hongwei
    Li, Shuang
    Liang, Guoliang
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2025,
  • [27] Optimization and guidance of very low-thrust transfers to geostationary orbit
    Gil-Fernandez, Jesus
    Tarabini, Lorenzo
    Graziano, Mariella
    Gomez-Tierno, M. A.
    JBIS-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH INTERPLANETARY SOCIETY, 2008, 61 (04): : 139 - 145
  • [28] Direct optimization of low-thrust orbit-raising maneuvers using adjoint sensitivities
    Arustei, Adrian
    Dutta, Atri
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2024, 219 : 965 - 981
  • [29] Co-state initialization for the minimum-time low-thrust trajectory optimization
    Taheri, Ehsan
    Li, Nan I.
    Kolmanovsky, Ilya
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2017, 59 (09) : 2360 - 2373
  • [30] Low-Thrust Many-Revolution Trajectory Optimization via Differential Dynamic Programming and a Sundman Transformation
    Jonathan D. Aziz
    Jeffrey S. Parker
    Daniel J. Scheeres
    Jacob A. Englander
    The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2018, 65 : 205 - 228