Impacts of fairness concerns on financing equilibrium in a low-carbon supply chain

被引:10
|
作者
Tang, Ruihong [1 ]
Yang, Lei [2 ]
Ji, Jingna [3 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business, Tianjin 300222, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Dept Elect Business, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business Adm, Guangzhou 510320, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fairness concerns; Supply chain finance; Low carbon; Carbon tax; Capital constraint; ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY; PEER-INDUCED FAIRNESS; TRADE CREDIT; EMISSION REDUCTION; SOCIAL PREFERENCES; PERMISSIBLE DELAY; MODEL; QUALITY; PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tre.2023.103328
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With the implementation of low-carbon policy, many companies begin to consider environmental issues when making decisions. This paper investigates a one-manufacturer-one-retailer supply chain under the low-carbon environment, where the retailer is capital-constrained and the manufacturer provides two credit strategies: manufacturer finance and manufacturer investment. The findings show that without fairness concerns, manufacturer investment is the financing equilibrium, and if the cost coefficient of emission reduction is small, manufacturer investment produces lower total carbon emissions and thus the environmental and profitability goals can align. However, different from the literature, when considering the fairness concerns of the retailer, manufacturer finance becomes the financing equilibrium and the high fairness concerns level would reduce the equilibrium region, which is unfavorable for firms to achieve a win-win situation. Finally, we find that fairness concerns would not always benefit the retailer profitably, but could generate higher environmental performance. Our work has the important management implications for firms by exploring impacts of fairness concerns on financing and environment.
引用
收藏
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Which Is the Best Supply Chain Policy: Carbon Tax, or a Low-Carbon Subsidy?
    Wu, Hanbo
    Sun, Yaxin
    Su, Yutong
    Chen, Ming
    Zhao, Hongxia
    Li, Qi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [42] Considering Blockchain Technology and Fairness Concerns for Supply Chain Pricing Decisions under Carbon Cap-and-Trade Mechanism
    Gong, Yande
    Jiang, Xinze
    Wang, Zhe
    Zhan, Jizhou
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (16)
  • [43] Financing equilibrium in a green supply chain with capital constraint
    Fang, Lei
    Xu, Song
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 143
  • [44] Low-carbon supply policies and supply chain performance with carbon concerned demand
    Du, Shaofu
    Hu, Li
    Wang, Li
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 255 (1-2) : 569 - 590
  • [45] Low-carbon supply policies and supply chain performance with carbon concerned demand
    Shaofu Du
    Li Hu
    Li Wang
    Annals of Operations Research, 2017, 255 : 569 - 590
  • [46] Low-carbon manufacturing-remanufacturing supply chain: systematic review and bibliometric analysis
    Abassi, Basma
    Turki, Sadok
    Dellagi, Sofiene
    Bellamine, Ilyes
    SUPPLY CHAIN FORUM, 2025,
  • [47] Low-carbon investment supply chain decisions under manufacturer competition
    Zhang, Yanli
    Che, Jianxin
    Qiu, Ju
    Tang, Wenzhi
    Zheng, Shanshan
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [48] Supply Chain Investment, Financing Schemes With the Uncertainty of Low-Carbon Technology Innovation: Carbon Asset Pledge vs. Sell-Buyback?
    Li, Jiawen
    Xu, Xiaomin
    Huang, Shengzhong
    Fu, Hongyong
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2025, 46 (03) : 1888 - 1912
  • [49] Decision making and coordination of fresh agriculture product supply chain considering fairness concerns
    Yan, Bo
    Chen, Yan-Ru
    He, Shi-You
    RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2020, 54 (04) : 1231 - 1248
  • [50] Cooperation choice in an online low-carbon supply chain
    Li, Guozheng
    Xu, Xinxin
    RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 58 (01) : 303 - 326