Sustainable development: The role of sustainability committees in achieving ESG targets

被引:24
作者
Abdullah, Aso [1 ,2 ]
Yamak, Sibel [1 ]
Korzhenitskaya, Anna [1 ]
Rahimi, Roya [1 ]
Mcclellan, Jeanette [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wolverhampton, Business & Management, Wolverhampton, England
[2] Univ Wolverhampton, Business & Management, Wulfruna St, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, England
关键词
ESG; legitimacy theory; resource dependence theory; sustainability committee; sustainability performance; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; BOARD-OF-DIRECTORS; FIRM PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; DISCLOSURE EVIDENCE; MODERATING ROLE; GOVERNANCE; DIVERSITY; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3596
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigating the impact of sustainability committee characteristics (SCCs) on corporate sustainability performance (CSP) utilised environmental, social and governance (ESG) scoring. Based on secondary data obtained from Refinitiv, Fame and FTSE 150 databases, the sample consists of 112 non-financial companies from 2010 to 2018, thus 926 firm-year observations. The results reveal a positive and significant relationship between organisational factors including firm size, profitability and firm age across combined ESG and environmental scores. As for the sustainability committee characteristics, there is a positive association between frequency of committee meeting and age diversity with governance scores and a negative relationship between frequency of committee meeting and environmental performance. The empirical finding shows positive and negative relationships under the presence of focussed and non-focussed committees equally. Furthermore, the presence of focussed or non-focussed sustainability committees (SCs) do appear to have an association with the overall CSP. Furthermore, this paper provides empirical evidence of the insignificant relationship of SCC with the sub-dimension of social performance, which contradicts our hypothesis and existing studies. Together with SCC's weak associations with environment and governance dimensions, this finding supports the argument that firms are actively using sustainability committees to create positive public image and reputation to protect legitimacy.
引用
收藏
页码:2250 / 2268
页数:19
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]  
Abu Bakar A. B. S., 2019, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, V9, P1044, DOI [DOI 10.6007/IJARBSS/V9-I3/5663, 10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i2/5663, DOI 10.6007/IJARBSS/V9-I2/5663]
[2]   Women on boards: The superheroes of tomorrow? [J].
Adams, Renee B. .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2016, 27 (03) :371-386
[3]   Credibility of sustainability reports: The contribution of audit committees [J].
Al-Shaer, Habiba ;
Zaman, Mahbub .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 27 (07) :973-986
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, YOUTUBE VIDEO, V2, P49
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SUST REP GUID
[6]   The determinants of corporate sustainability performance [J].
Artiach, Tracy ;
Lee, Darren ;
Nelson, David ;
Walker, Julie .
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2010, 50 (01) :31-51
[7]   Board Independence and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: The Mediating Role of the Presence of Family Ownership [J].
Bansal, Shashank ;
Lopez-Perez, Maria Victoria ;
Rodriguez-Ariza, Lazaro .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2018, 8 (03)
[8]   CSR Committees and Their Effect on ESG Performance in UK, France, Germany, and Spain [J].
Baraibar-Diez, Elisa ;
Odriozola, Maria D. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (18)
[9]   Sustainability and financial performance of small and medium sized enterprises: A bibliometric and systematic literature review [J].
Bartolacci, Francesca ;
Caputo, Andrea ;
Soverchia, Michela .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (03) :1297-1309
[10]   Ethical Reputation of Financial Institutions: Do Board Characteristics Matter? [J].
Baselga-Pascual, Laura ;
Trujillo-Ponce, Antonio ;
Vahamaa, Emilia ;
Vahamaa, Sami .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 148 (03) :489-510