Biomechanical Performance of Biodegradable Screw Fixation in Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis

被引:0
|
作者
Firriolo, Joseph Mark [1 ,4 ]
Xue, Yunfeng [1 ]
Weyerbacher, Jonathan S. [1 ]
Saldana, Golddy M. [1 ]
Garfinkel, Alec [2 ]
Garcia, Tanya C. [3 ]
Arzi, Boaz [3 ]
Wong, Granger B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Sacramento, CA USA
[2] Calif Northstate Univ, Coll Med, Elk Grove, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Surg & Radiol Sci, Davis, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 2335 Stockton Blvd,6th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
关键词
Biomechanics; mandible; micrognathism; osteogenesis; distraction; BONE;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000009691
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Internal distraction devices are commonly used in congenital micrognathia. The eventual need for device and screw removal can be challenging, requiring extensive dissection and disturbance of bone regenerate. Bioabsorbable poly-L-lactide (PLLA) screws, compared to traditional titanium screws, simplify device removal. Previous in vivo studies have found that the maximal compressive force generated by mandibular distraction is 69.4N. We hypothesized that PLLA screws could support these compressive/distraction forces. Ten mandibles were obtained from 5 canine cadavers. Paired mandibles from the same cadaver were each fixated to a mandibular distractor with eight screws (either titanium or PLLA). Devices were each set to 15 and 30 mm of distraction distance. Compression force of 80 N was then generated parallel to the axis of the distraction device. Distractor displacement was measured to detect any mechanical failure during this pre-set load. Finally, if no failure was observed at 80 N, a load-to-failure compression test was done in the PLLA group to determine the mechanical failure point. All distractors in both the titanium and PLLA screw groups withstood 80 N of compression without failure. When the load-to-failure test was performed in the PLLA group, the average device failure point was 172.8 N (range 148-196 N). Review of high-frame-rate video demonstrated that all failures occurred due to the PLLA screws breaking or falling out. Bioabsorbable PLLA screws can withstand compressive forces more than double that of the maximal in vivo forces needed during mandibular distraction. These screws may be an acceptable alternative for the fixation of internal mandibular distractors.
引用
收藏
页码:2228 / 2231
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Masticatory mechanics of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site: Interfragmentary micromovement
    Sun, Zongyang
    Rafferty, Katherine L.
    Egbert, Mark A.
    Herring, Susan W.
    BONE, 2007, 41 (02) : 188 - 196
  • [42] Angiogenesis is enhanced by continuous traction in rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Zheng, Li Wu
    Ma, Li
    Cheung, Lim Kwong
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 37 (07) : 405 - 411
  • [43] Correction of Airway Obstruction in Congenital Micrognathia by Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Bukhari, Syed Gulzar Ali
    Khan, Sarfaraz
    Ahmed, Waseem
    Ashfaq, Muhammad
    Khan, Shahid Iqbal
    Abdullah
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2011, 21 (07): : 423 - 425
  • [44] Total facial nerve injury during mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Belcher, Ryan H.
    Phillips, James D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 136
  • [45] Intermittent loading improves results in mandibular alveolar distraction osteogenesis
    Consolo, U
    Bertoldi, C
    Zaffe, D
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (02) : 179 - 187
  • [46] Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in the Micrognathic Neonate: A Review for Neonatologists and Pediatricians
    Hong, Paul
    Bezuhly, Michael
    PEDIATRICS AND NEONATOLOGY, 2013, 54 (03): : 153 - 160
  • [47] Effect of Gene Transfecting at Different Times on Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Wu, Guoping
    Hu, Chunbing
    He, Xiaochuan
    Yin, Kang
    Lan, Yongshu
    Zhou, Bin
    Li, Shaolan
    Guo, Li
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (01) : 232 - 236
  • [48] Autologous tissue engineering by means of distraction osteogenesis: Biomechanical considerations
    Schouman, T.
    Raoul, G.
    Dubois, G.
    REVUE DE STOMATOLOGIE DE CHIRURGIE MAXILLO-FACIALE ET DE CHIRURGIE ORALE, 2011, 112 (04) : 222 - 228
  • [49] “Transport Distraction Osteogenesis for Reconstruction of Mandibular Defects”: Our Experience
    Nanjappa M.
    Natashekara M.
    Sendil Kumar C.
    Kumaraswamy S.V.
    Keerthi R.
    Ashwin D.P.
    Gopinath A.L.
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2011, 10 (2) : 93 - 100
  • [50] Treatment of unilateral buccal crossbite with mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis
    Ozkalayci, Nurhat
    Ozer, Mete
    Sumer, Mahmut
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 41 (01) : 59 - 69