Biomechanical Performance of Biodegradable Screw Fixation in Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis

被引:0
|
作者
Firriolo, Joseph Mark [1 ,4 ]
Xue, Yunfeng [1 ]
Weyerbacher, Jonathan S. [1 ]
Saldana, Golddy M. [1 ]
Garfinkel, Alec [2 ]
Garcia, Tanya C. [3 ]
Arzi, Boaz [3 ]
Wong, Granger B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Sacramento, CA USA
[2] Calif Northstate Univ, Coll Med, Elk Grove, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Surg & Radiol Sci, Davis, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 2335 Stockton Blvd,6th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
关键词
Biomechanics; mandible; micrognathism; osteogenesis; distraction; BONE;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000009691
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Internal distraction devices are commonly used in congenital micrognathia. The eventual need for device and screw removal can be challenging, requiring extensive dissection and disturbance of bone regenerate. Bioabsorbable poly-L-lactide (PLLA) screws, compared to traditional titanium screws, simplify device removal. Previous in vivo studies have found that the maximal compressive force generated by mandibular distraction is 69.4N. We hypothesized that PLLA screws could support these compressive/distraction forces. Ten mandibles were obtained from 5 canine cadavers. Paired mandibles from the same cadaver were each fixated to a mandibular distractor with eight screws (either titanium or PLLA). Devices were each set to 15 and 30 mm of distraction distance. Compression force of 80 N was then generated parallel to the axis of the distraction device. Distractor displacement was measured to detect any mechanical failure during this pre-set load. Finally, if no failure was observed at 80 N, a load-to-failure compression test was done in the PLLA group to determine the mechanical failure point. All distractors in both the titanium and PLLA screw groups withstood 80 N of compression without failure. When the load-to-failure test was performed in the PLLA group, the average device failure point was 172.8 N (range 148-196 N). Review of high-frame-rate video demonstrated that all failures occurred due to the PLLA screws breaking or falling out. Bioabsorbable PLLA screws can withstand compressive forces more than double that of the maximal in vivo forces needed during mandibular distraction. These screws may be an acceptable alternative for the fixation of internal mandibular distractors.
引用
收藏
页码:2228 / 2231
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomechanical evaluation of a novel mandibular distraction osteogenesis protocol: an in-vitro validation and the practical use of the method
    Sensoy, A. T.
    Kaymaz, I.
    Ertas, U.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 24 (07) : 765 - 776
  • [22] Helical distraction is superior to linear and circular distraction in mandibular distraction osteogenesis: an in silico study
    Gateno, J.
    Kim, D.
    Bartlett, S.
    Deng, H. H.
    Xu, J.
    Xia, J. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 53 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [23] Reconstruction of Mandibular Segmental Detects Using Transport Disk Distraction Osteogenesis
    Li, Tao
    Man, Yi
    Bi, Ruiye
    Jiang, Nan
    Li, Yunfeng
    Zhu, Songsong
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (08) : 2088 - 2092
  • [24] Animal model for evaluation of strain gauge in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits
    Wu, Zhongyin
    Liu, Yanpu
    Singare, Sekou
    Li, Dichen
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 45 (08) : 633 - 636
  • [25] Systemic melatonin application increases bone formation in mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Acikan, Izzet
    Gul, Mehmet
    Artas, Gokhan
    Yaman, Ferhan
    Deniz, Gulnihal
    Bulmus, Ozgur
    Kom, Mustafa
    Kirtay, Mustafa
    Dundar, Serkan
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2018, 32
  • [26] Biomechanical and clinical implications of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery
    Meyer, U
    Kleinheinz, J
    Joos, U
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 32 (03) : 140 - 149
  • [27] Management of Mandibular Hypoplasia Using Distraction Osteogenesis Technique
    陶学金
    樊敏
    凌翔
    陈卫民
    华中科技大学学报(医学英德文版), 2004, (01) : 92 - 94
  • [28] Effects of rhythm of distraction osteogenesis on sagittal mandibular lengthening
    do Vale, Francisco
    Cabrita, Siluerio
    Malo Abreu, Joao Luis
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE ESTOMATOLOGIA MEDICINA DENTARIA E CIRURGIA MAXILOFACIAL, 2013, 54 (03): : 124 - 130
  • [29] Serial bone densitometry during mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Campisi, P
    Hamdy, RC
    Lauzier, D
    Lessard, ML
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2003, 6 (03) : 225 - 230
  • [30] Unilateral mandibular ramus elongation by intraoral distraction osteogenesis
    Kofod, T
    Norholt, SE
    Pedersen, TK
    Jensen, J
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 16 (02) : 247 - 254